- Joined
- Sep 9, 2007
- Messages
- 15,021
- Reaction score
- 2,637
I definitely think there is a disconnect when it comes to figuring out if a fighter is passed his prime or just encountered a better fighter. Guys who fight into their 40's like Dan Henderson are very rare. Randy Couture winning the HW belt at age 45 and then defending it is insanity. In boxing only George Foreman has done that. Anderson was peaking until almost 39 years old but now we have to question if his career was extended by PED's.
What gets me is people who called Shogun old when he was 29 and people who now label Aldo as passed his prime when he is only 31 years old.
The problem is that too many Sherdoggers don't even understand what the term "prime" implies. The term suggests a fighter at his best. Your prime, in ANY sport, last like 3 or 4 years.
Of COURSE Shogun post knee surgery, broken arm, etc, etc was not the best version of himself.
Of COURSE Aldo at 31, post McGregor KO, wasn't AS prime as a 26 YO, never been KOd, surging and still improving Holloway.
And just because a guy is still winning late in his career, like Anderson or Foreman, doesn't mean those are his prime years. It just means he's enough better than the field that he can lose a step and still hang with the elites.