Did you read the article? Liberals are happy to use other people's money to fund tax credits and grants to promote a technology that isn't otherwise valuable enough to persuade customers to buy it or for companies to accommodate it (with charging stations). Liberal states spend more to promote electric vehicles than red states do.
Even if you get range to be several hundreds of miles, electric vehicles aren't suitable for road trips because of the recharging time. That means most families wont buy an electric vehicle to be their only / primary vehicle.
Also, electric vehicles typically aren't capable of the same acceleration as their ICE counterparts (Teslas are the exception here). In some places, a slowly accelerating vehicle is a danger to the occupants and those nearby. Regardless of the danger issue, the inability to merge quickly costs people in slow vehicles, by prolonging their commutes.
Regarding maintenance, not every shop is prepared to service electric vehicles. This makes maintenance more difficult, and can make it more costly as well. A friend of mine recently had to have their Tesla towed hundreds of miles because they tried to make a point about taking an electric car on a road trip. It broke down on them hundreds of miles from home, and none of the nearby shops wanted to work on that car. That maintenance cost them plenty of money, and time, and ruined their vacation.
as i understand it the incentives vary by state, and are an inducement to take up a new technology instead of the overwhelmingly established one.
they probably have clean air targets to meet and this is a cost saving method of reaching them.
i would imagine gas car producers have been the happy recipients of billions in tax breaks and special deals by states over the years.
not to mention the trillions spent on foreign "adventures " to secure cheap oil supplies.
fast chargers can recharge 80% of the battery in 30 to 45 minutes, its just a matter of time before the infrastructure is in place to support nationwide charging.
anyway, as i said, range extenders make that argument a non starter.
i was under the impression that electric motors were considerably faster accelerating than a gas powered gearbox driven car, certainly tesla has supercar performance.
using a single incident to illustrate the reliability of electric cars is not really going to stand up as an argument.
its a relatively new technology,and a tesla is probably under warranty for repair only by authorised dealers.
i imagine if a ferrari broke down in alabama you'd be hard pressed to find a nearby repair shop to tackle the job, as with the charging infrastructure, give it a few years and a more established network will grow to service it.
maintenance costs are a fraction of a gas powered car, simply by having less components to go wrong (3000 compared to several hundred), and less to replace as they wear.
i understand these vehicles arent for everyone, some want a truck for hauling and off road capability, well thats coming too.
there are arguments to be made that it will adversly affect jobs in the auto sector, less mechanics, parts dealers, etc, and thats understandable
but these objections dont really convince me you have thought this through.