- Joined
- Feb 13, 2006
- Messages
- 4,580
- Reaction score
- 82
Ahhh... wouldn't that be rape?
Equal outcomes bro. If some guys out there are getting some hot strange it isn't fair that all the other guys aren't as well. Redistribution of wealth and sex. Otherwise how could society be fair? At least that's the idea I got spending about fifteen minutes searching sexual communism. The sources I was looking at were basically saying if ownership of property is prohibited by communism, so is monogamy. Monogamy is a capitalist tool to promote exclusivity and ownership. If you can't own a house you can't own your body, ownership of yourself implies that you can be bought and sold like a commodity.
Personally, I think this is ridiculous, but this is apparently what sexual communism is. According to the three or four links I viewed. Although one source was more tempered in its radicalism. If this is what the hard leftists believe it might give some new insight into the rape gangs, sexual "emergencies" and taharrush imported into Europe.
The essay in the OP closes by stating that "no person who isn't a sexual communist is really a leftist." If your not a sexual communist your literally Hitler. The point I was making with my post was expressing my perplexity at the idea that this is what she may have meant and that this may be where communism is going. It's a Brave New World after all. To be honest I think the sex robots they have in the works will solve this issue if it ever were to go this far. But as Professor Peterson says, the postmodernists want to destroy your ability to lift yourself up and they know exactly what they are doing.
I read "Anthem" by Ayn Rand in high school and in that book the totalitarian government assigns people to have sex for procreation every seven years.
Last edited: