- Joined
- May 11, 2005
- Messages
- 5,372
- Reaction score
- 26
There is a reason why professional/Olympic athletes get PT grafts over hamstring. The fears about harvesting a PT and doing damage are myths; the research 100% does not show any link between a pt harvest causing injury. IN addition, if this were the case, hamstring would be out of the question completely if harvesting caused additional injuries.No they are not What info did you present re: PT vs Quad braided hammy? They don't do PT grafts here - and as I understand it, these are riskier for grapplers anyway (due to the fact that it restricts kneeling / increases risk of patellar fracture at later stage).
I had quad braided hammy: the tunnel placements are good (a whole other topic...!) but I know if they went in and did a second graft, they'd either have to drill a second tunnel OR widen the existing tunnels (if I went for something like LARS). Complications all around
If you've had three, can you tell me more about what they used the second/third time, complications etc?
Knees suck, man. That's all I've got to say on that
I had two allografts of a quad braided achillies, then my PT graft which was a thousand percent better in terms of recovery time and strength. Both knees are fine, the one that got the PT graft is stronger. There were zero complications minus some scar tissue got popped off in a competition about 7 months after first allograft. That hurt and was scary, but my knee was fine within a few minutes.