- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,002
- Reaction score
- 0
He's actually factually wrong. This violated the law. Citizen's United did nothing to overturn parts of §201 and §330. The very parts NRA is alleged to have violated regarding individuals running for federal office.
So no his analysis is not much closer to correct. He's actually wrong.
Just so we all know your stances completely, you're 100% fine with any illegal campaign finance activity right? I'm sure you think Cohen's guilty plea shouldn't stand and that he pleaded to something that isn't a crime too. Right?
It's astounding that even when confronted with the applicable sections of law and how the case did nothing to affect it, you're still too much of a hack to admit any wrongdoing
I hate CU more then anyone here I think. With that said, I see what Cubo is saying.
If you can strike down the McCain-Fiengold campaign finance law by claiming money is protected speech, then why isn't a 501C4 Pac receive the same speech protections?
Really it just shows what a shitty and flawed decision CU is. Every justice that voted for that should be removed from the supreme Court.