- Joined
- Jul 26, 2012
- Messages
- 88,776
- Reaction score
- 41,005
Both are outstanding but GMG is better value imho.Still need to pick up a traeger
Both are outstanding but GMG is better value imho.Still need to pick up a traeger
Not possible. That fucking Garrett character produces small round poops like a rabbit. As you would expect from a weak piece of garbage.Garrett is the type of guy to clog your toilet and not even tell you
You sound poor. Haven't seen much positive about Traeger. Since you are the Big Baller you should look into the MAK line of pellet cookers.Still need to pick up a traeger
The Steelers front loaded the money in Bell’s contract, helping him out. When he ends up on a losing team everyone will know why.Fair offer? You mean the offer that had zero guaranteed money after the first year? Lmao
we still need to fire out couch
i would keep a couch over Garrettwe still need to fire out couch
i would keep a couch over Garrett
He's hilarious, and a pretty straight forward communicator/leader. I'm looking forward to watching Baker be QB of the Browns for years to come.
Fuck the PatriotsThe Patriots are an odd team. Only team to hand the Chiefs a loss, hold Rodgers to under 20 and score over 30 on the Packers, out-duel the Bears- scoring nearly 40 on their top defense, beat the Texans as well, but their three losses are beatings by mediocre teams, two who have only three wins.
Perhaps one can day the two bad losses (Lions and Titans) were due in no small part to former Patriots heading up those teams with Patriots players on them.
I guess it fits this year though given the Saints' only loss is to the Bucks, and they had to pull a 4th quarter comeback to just get by the Browns winning by a field goal with under 30 seconds to play.
That and the Steelers have a tie against the Browns.
Special teams is what did in the Bears. They gave up 2 TDsThe Patriots are an odd team. Only team to hand the Chiefs a loss, hold Rodgers to under 20 and score over 30 on the Packers, out-duel the Bears- scoring nearly 40 on their top defense, beat the Texans as well, but their three losses are beatings by mediocre teams, two who have only three wins.
Perhaps one can day the two bad losses (Lions and Titans) were due in no small part to former Patriots heading up those teams with Patriots players on them.
I guess it fits this year though given the Saints' only loss is to the Bucks, and they had to pull a 4th quarter comeback to just get by the Browns winning by a field goal with under 30 seconds to play.
That and the Steelers have a tie against the Browns.
I agree 100%, Since their return in 99, we have had guys who showed flashes that they may have promise, but even they were mostly retreads. Kelly Holcomb,Derek Anderson,Brian Hoyer ect, and then disasters like Weeden and Manziel..I mean there's a reason why Baker was starting QB number 30 since 1999. The thing I like most about him is his poise both on an off the field. Sure you could point to the Kansas game, or the arrest as potential red flags, but they really seem like isolated incidents. He consistently gives thoughtful answers in interviews, defends himself teammates, and coaches while remaining respectful at the same time (The Colin Cowherd interview is a prime example of this), and came in saying he wants to be a leader of the team..while actually showing he is striving to back up those words. It's a breath of fresh air for a franchise who's best player in the last 2 decades was Joe Thomas, who despite being an all-time great at the position of LT ..it's not that exciting to watch as a kid or help put fans in the seats.As a long time Browns fan, it's really weird having a promising QB.