But who took the pictures? I can follow anyone around anywhere and take pictures that make them look bad just by timing it right.People always make shit up, but I think the ability to deflect varies depending on personality. I think people also judge politicians running in elections differently to how they judge politicians in office. She was popular as a senator and as secretary of state, but that somehow didn't carry through for either of her presidential campaigns.
People are discussing her lying stats, they're irrelevant everyone can agree she lost the election to the most obviously proven liar who ever ran for office. Her main downfall was her personality, which is pretty much non existent compared to super cool Obama, and master troll Trump.
I think these pictures sum her up quite well. She's visiting a crappy apartment in Harlem, the residents were supposed to be part of her core demographic and she looks like she's exploring a cave on an alien planet.
Everything people hate about Hillary, Trump is far guiltier of.
Campaign spent a lot of time trying to fight against Hillary's "unlikeability" and her being "inauthentic"
Hillary swore a lot during prep-time for debates to ensure she didn't swear during the actual debate.
That is the best you can come up with? Pathetic.He's not guilty of running a lazy campaign.
You''re doing a remarkable job describing Trump yet he won. Seems like there were other factors at play to me.
You're right. He was so diligent that he hired Paul Manafort as his campaign manager lol!He's not guilty of running a lazy campaign.
You're right. He was so diligent that he hired Paul Manafort as his campaign manager lol!
Why don't you stick to whining about Trudeau instead of trying to pollute our politics further?That does not equate to laziness. It's so funny that you Hill Shills can't even admit to the slightest criticism towards her and her failed campaign.
She was LAZY. That, above all else, lost her the election. You don't have to like Trump to see that he clearly out worked her lazy ass during the campaign.
That does not equate to laziness. It's so funny that you Hill Shills can't even admit to the slightest criticism towards her and her failed campaign.
She was LAZY. That, above all else, lost her the election. You don't have to like Trump to see that he clearly out worked her lazy ass during the campaign.
Why not both?Oh you mean like when earlier in the thread I said she made terrible mistakes in the Rust belt (failed to campaign there)? Do you even try to put in effort when you respond?
It is either lazy of Trump or he knowingly hired a crook to run his campaign, but you can't have it both ways.
Could be!Why not both?
Oh you mean like when earlier in the thread I said she made terrible mistakes in the Rust belt (failed to campaign there)? Do you even try to put in effort when you respond?
Explain, and see if you can do it without reference to gay people or abortion.Evangelicals are better off with any republican in the white house.
To be honest, it was more arrogance and poor strategy than laziness.Oh', please. You've been in this thread doing nothing but defending any and all criticisms levied against her. How many posts you got here, like 30? Oh', but you said she made some mistakes in one post. That wipes all of your blatant Hill Shilling before and after that statement away.
Considering the shit I could say about her, calling her lazy was pretty tame, and you couldn't even let that one go.
ROFL. You guys are a fucking joke.
Oh', please. You've been in this thread doing nothing but defending any and all criticisms levied against her. How many posts you got here, like 30? Oh', but you said she made some mistakes in one post. That wipes all of your blatant Hill Shilling before and after that statement away.
Considering the shit I could say about her, calling her lazy was pretty tame, and you couldn't even let that one go.
ROFL. You guys are a fucking joke.
Explain, and see if you can do it without reference to gay people or abortion.
Republicans certainly don't live and Govern with the the values of Christianity, all they do is pander to the gullible.Because republican voters are traditionally the people who follow and revere religion in this country. Our political parties tend to support their voting base.
Republicans certainly don't live and Govern with the the values of Christianity, all they do is pander to the gullible.
What I would say, is everybody should live their personal values. Religion should have no place in politics, and you vote for whichever side does the greatest good for greatest number of citizens.And what do they get from the left?
The entire country lives with the values of Christianity.