- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 10,260
- Reaction score
- 5
I want to know what @Jack V Savage thinks
10 billion seems way too cheap. Add two more zeroes and I'd believe it.
Anyway, launching from the moon is the most feasible way to send people to Mars. Or to mine asteroids or whatever.
I'm all for it.
We'd have to fuck it up pretty bad to have it create changes on Earth. I suppose if we KOed it from orbit the ocean tides would stop, the oceans would become stagnant, and all hell would break loose, but other than that it is hard to imagine what we could do up there that would cause more than aesthetic damage, like turn it brown, or have human made structures visible on it.I like the idea but then part of me worries about what happens here if we fuck up the moon somehow?
Lmao....more like a 100 billion
Trump seems to be talking up the space program. What better way to prove American exceptionalism then build a big ass American moon base.
But if you create jobs on the moon do they count as domestic?
Should take that 10 billion and develop a 21st century space shuttle. Fuck a base that will probably spend most of its time being uninhabited.
Damn outer space stealing American jobs...lets put this way, you would produce jobs on the moon if you consider all the rare metals and under ground water on the under lunar surface.
We havent had a real successor to the space shuttle yet. There were 2 but where cancled
look up the VentureStar and X-33
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2006/01/x-33venturestar-what-really-happened/
Took your advice. Interesting read.