Milo Resigns from Breitbart

I'm obviously not speaking about the Conservative Christians, but mostly the liberal-leaning folk who believe their position of apathy to be a position of higher virtue.

When prompted, they do obviously care very much about these issues. But they only speak up on them when it is convenient, when it is socially acceptable to do so.

They've never claimed to have a position of apathy. I think you have the position misunderstood. They've always said that we should protect the ability of people to sleep with whomever they want. That's not apathy.
 
They've never claimed to have a position of apathy. I think you have the position misunderstood. They've always said that we should protect the ability of people to sleep with whomever they want. That's not apathy.

So why is this protection not extending to Milo? Is he operating outside of their protection racket?
 
So why is this protection not extending to Milo? Is he outside of their protection racket?

It was conservatives, not liberals, that responded to his statements by cancelling his speaking engagement and putting pressure on their organizations to distance themselves from him.
 
No. For stuff like calling author NK Jemisin a genetically inferior "Half Savage" and conflating her race with violent attacks on white people.

You want to argue that comment isn't racism?
The fact that he's just playing an online persona to troll for attention, really isn't an excuse.

That's by definition racism.... if he's referring to her sub-humanity by virtue of her race. Anything on that?
 
It was conservatives, not liberals, that responded to his statements by cancelling his speaking engagement and putting pressure on their organizations to distance themselves from him.

A lot of people here seem to be forgetting this.
 
It was conservatives, not liberals, that responded to his statements by cancelling his speaking engagement and putting pressure on their organizations to distance themselves from him.

The scandal was created and escalated by liberal media outlets. Conservatives, or well, "conservatives" caved in.

http://nvdems.com/press/nv-dems-cha...draw-cpac-keynote-speaker-defends-pedophilia/

C5FelFtVcAARU8P.jpg:large






Most "conservatives" were already aware of the comments he had made on Rogan's podcast (with over 1 million viewers) more than a year ago.
 
That's by definition racism.... if he's referring to her sub-humanity by virtue of her race. Anything on that?

The quote is a link to his blog post.
If you want to defend that, go right ahead.
I probably won't leave it linked for long.
His blog is a cesspit, and people can find it if they want.
 
The scandal was created and escalated by liberal media outlets. Conservatives, or well, "conservatives" caved in.

http://nvdems.com/press/nv-dems-cha...draw-cpac-keynote-speaker-defends-pedophilia/

C5FelFtVcAARU8P.jpg:large




Most "conservatives" were already aware of the comments he had made on Rogan's podcast (with over 1 million viewers) more than a year ago.


As noted in your post, liberals didn't try to stop Milo from speaking. They tried to stop someone else, Adam Laxalt, for political reasons, that sharing the stage with Milo would hurt their/his advocacy efforts in the state regarding sex crimes.

Conservatives on their own decided to silence Milo, not liberals.
 
The quote is a link to his blog post.
If you want to defend that, go right ahead.

Well I don't know you're putting it out there. Was he referring to her not being human by virtue of her race, or because he thought she was just a repulsive person with repulsive ideas?

All I've seen from him is a defense of an in-group preference for Caucasians. That's not racism, especially considering the current movements by other ethnicities to draw similar lines with regard to race.
 
I'm shocked that anyone thought you could transition to being a "Big Tent" conservative icon in the United States as a homosexual with a history of advocating pederasty.
Thankfully the entirety of American Conservative isn't just a bunch of online trolls.

In fairness it worked for some famous Catholics.

{<RR}
 
As noted in your post, liberals didn't try to stop Milo from speaking. They tried to stop someone else, Adam Laxalt, for political reasons, that sharing the stage with Milo would hurt their/his advocacy efforts in the state regarding sex crimes.

Conservatives on their own decided to silence Milo, not liberals.

Conservatives wouldn't have done jack-shit if the liberal media hadn't suddenly decided to make this into an issue, when it was barely even mentioned a year or so ago, merely because Milo was gaining too much mainstream attention for their tastes, and because he was also starting to make a little too much sense, and had become a bit too likeable for a lot of young people, to be allowed to continue on.

This scandal was not manufactured by conservatives. They simply relented under pressure. They exposed their weakness, but the liberals have exposed their hypocrisy. They intentionally misrepresented a man who himself was a victim of child abuse, and was speaking out of a position of trying to rationalize his own experiences, rather than trying to defend pedophilia itself.
 
The scandal was created and escalated by liberal media outlets. Conservatives, or well, "conservatives" caved in.

http://nvdems.com/press/nv-dems-cha...draw-cpac-keynote-speaker-defends-pedophilia/

C5FelFtVcAARU8P.jpg:large






Most "conservatives" were already aware of the comments he had made on Rogan's podcast (with over 1 million viewers) more than a year ago.




Conservatives wouldn't have done jack-shit if the liberal media hadn't suddenly decided to make this into an issue, when it was barely even mentioned a year or so ago, merely because Milo was gaining too much mainstream attention for their tastes, and because he was also starting to make a little too much sense, and had become a bit too likeable for a lot of young people, to be allowed to continue on.

This scandal was not manufactured by conservatives. They simply relented under pressure. They exposed their weakness, but the liberals have exposed their hypocrisy. They intentionally misrepresented a man who himself was a victim of child abuse, and was speaking out of a position of trying to rationalize his own experiences, rather than trying to defend pedophilia itself.
lol Milo said the scandal was because of conservatives not liberals.
 
Conservatives wouldn't have done jack-shit if the liberal media hadn't suddenly decided to make this into an issue, when it was barely even mentioned a year or so ago, merely because Milo was gaining too much mainstream attention for their tastes, and because he was also starting to make a little too much sense, and had become a bit too likeable for a lot of young people, to be allowed to continue on.

This scandal was not manufactured by conservatives. They simply relented under pressure. They exposed their weakness, but the liberals have exposed their hypocrisy. They intentionally misrepresented a man who himself was a victim of child abuse, and was speaking out of a position of trying to rationalize his own experiences, rather than trying to defend pedophilia itself.

Actually, it was conservatives who put the video back into the public conversation to force CPAC to distance themselves from him, not liberals.

Though the video has been online for over a year, it resurfaced just a week before his appearance at CPAC, highlighted by conservative blog Reagan Battalion and quickly went viral.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/13643...pe-him-blew-internet-james-barrett#exit-modal

This entire thing started because conservatives took offense at Milo's comments from a year ago and didn't think he belonged at CPAC.
 
Milo has been playing with fire a long time. No surprise he got burned.
 
Conservatives wouldn't have done jack-shit if the liberal media hadn't suddenly decided to make this into an issue, when it was barely even mentioned a year or so ago, merely because Milo was gaining too much mainstream attention for their tastes, and because he was also starting to make a little too much sense, and had become a bit too likeable for a lot of young people, to be allowed to continue on.

This scandal was not manufactured by conservatives. They simply relented under pressure. They exposed their weakness, but the liberals have exposed their hypocrisy. They intentionally misrepresented a man who himself was a victim of child abuse, and was speaking out of a position of trying to rationalize his own experiences, rather than trying to defend pedophilia itself.
Since when do right wingers give a flying fuck about what the liberal media says? Like Pan told you several times, they caved into pressure from conservatives. Besides, an issue like child molestation isn't partisan, we all disagree with it right?
 
Since when do right wingers give a flying fuck about what the liberal media says? Like Pan told you several times, they caved into pressure from conservatives. Besides, an issue like child molestation isn't partisan, we all disagree with it right?
Conservatives only care about child molestation if it involves triangles and pizza.
 
Since when do right wingers give a flying fuck about what the liberal media says? Like Pan told you several times, they caved into pressure from conservatives. Besides, an issue like child molestation isn't partisan, we all disagree with it right?

This is not an issue with child molestation because Milo has never explictly argued in favour of it. His words were taken out of context, from a long podcast with Rogan where he already back-tracked on several of those statements during the argument and said that 16 should be the legal age of consent. Obviously, having a debate and entertaining ideas without accepting them, is beyond most people's understanding.

And no, they did not cave to pressure from conservatives. The Reagan battalion, or whatever, is an unknown commodity among conservative groups. Nobody knows who the hell they are, nobody pays any attention to them. The mainstream news decided to cover it, they are the ones who created the pressure. Various Democrat groups also mounted pressure to have Milo's license to speak revoked.

This "Reagan Battalion" seems rather questionable anyway:

http://www.independentsentinel.com/anti-milo-reagan-battalion-interviews-far-left-mic-com/

https://www.spartareport.com/2017/02/caught-the-reagan-battalion-is-a-democrat-front-group/

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/reagan-battalion-milo-yiannopoulos-never-trump/

I'll refrain from judgment until the situation is cleared up.
 
Last edited:
Referring to a mixed race person as a "half savage" should be obvious enough for most people. Not for the war room racists though.

The argument being that NOT seeing the implication of race in someone's argument... makes them a racist, or?
 
Back
Top