Media silence as another islam inspired attacker rams a car into pedestrians in Melbourne, Australia

jantar

Banned
Banned
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
1,022
Reaction score
0
Four people - including a young child - are dead and 31 have been hospitalised after a speeding car ploughed through pedestrians in the middle of Melbourne's CBD.

The australian media is already proclaiming it has nothing to do with terrorism. Do they have no shame? Video of the attack....



http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/l...s-heard-in-melbourne-cbd-20170120-gtvf3x.html

video of the witness hearing the attacker yelling alahu akbar...




The driver who ploughed his car into crowds on a Melbourne street killing four and injuring 15 others has been named as Dimitrious Gargasoulas, 26. Gargasoulas, who claims to be ‘Greek Islamic Kurdish’ and a follower of Yazdanism, has been found to have posted multiple rambling messages on social media in the last few days, ranting about the “illuminati”, promising “heaven and hell is real”, and vowing to “have god’s laws reinstated”.

Looks like a greek convert to islam.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/201...greek-islamic-kurd-with-mental-health-issues/
 
Last edited:
Gargasoulas, who claims to be ‘Greek Islamic Kurdish’ and a follower of Yazdanism, has been found to have posted multiple rambling messages on social media in the last few days, ranting about the “illuminati”, promising “heaven and hell is real”, and vowing to “have god’s laws reinstated”.

Tbh this sounds pretty oldschool insane.
 
How is driving a car at people, killing four and injuring more, not considered Terrorism?

Maybe if the media didn't try to blackout these crimes, then ordinary people wouldn't be so suspicious of their agenda.
 
Tbh this sounds pretty oldschool insane.

here's a good explanation of his facebook ramblings from a reddit poster

"god's laws" is direct reference to Sharia, "human laws" is a direct reference to infidels and secularism in general. "dogs" is a common reversal on gentile, it's used by Arabs to refer to Jews. "cult of angels" is a pre-islamic religion that was coopted into the islamic political mantra between the 7th and 10th century. "King of kings" is the title Muhammad took to claim himself a prophet. Calling yourself "king of kings" is a claim to to be a harbinger of Allah

 
Dude was old school crazy, most crazy people talk about god and hell and shit, doesn't make them a islamic fundamentalist.

Been known to police for a some time was charged in relation to a stabbing earlier in the week and has been known for domestic issue with police earlier.
 
How is driving a car at people, killing four and injuring more, not considered Terrorism?

Maybe if the media didn't try to blackout these crimes, then ordinary people wouldn't be so suspicious of their agenda.

When he has no bigger agenda. This was IMO a disturbed guy angry at the world and going out to kill people.

Maybe some group will claim it and then maybe yes it could be terrorism, but unless that happens and was what his real motive was (not that we will ever really know) its not terrorism.

Terrorism is scaring people so they do what you want, its requires an end goal or objective.

This is in no way a defence of his actions.
 
Dude was old school crazy, most crazy people talk about god and hell and shit, doesn't make them a islamic fundamentalist.

Been known to police for a some time was charged in relation to a stabbing earlier in the week and has been known for domestic issue with police earlier.

The law needs to be changed then. He should have been locked up until his trial. Then several other innocent people would still be alive.
 
How is driving a car at people, killing four and injuring more, not considered Terrorism?

Deliberately crashing planes is also not automatically terrorism. Unless you would say the Germanwings incident was an act of terrorism.

It is a fine line anyway. This guy, in all seriousness, probably was more insane than anything else. But

1) killing innocent people by crushing them with a vehicle deliberately probably requires a basic level of insanity in any case.

2) that does not excuse the deed in any case

3) if he recorded a video, would that make it 'real' terrorism?
 
When he has no bigger agenda. This was IMO a disturbed guy angry at the world and going out to kill people.

Maybe some group will claim it and then maybe yes it could be terrorism, but unless that happens and was what his real motive was (not that we will ever really know) its not terrorism.

Terrorism is scaring people so they do what you want, its requires an end goal or objective.

This is in no way a defence of his actions.

#terrorism
 
the man was suffering from "Sudden Jihad Syndrome"
 
I was a street away having lunch when it went down, decided to go check it out but couldn't see too much. Can confirm VicPol and the media are doing their best to hide any link to Islam, since there were eye witness reports the guy was screaming snackbar out the window of his car as he ran down a baby in a pram. This doesn't feel like a well planned isis style terrorist attack though. I'm all for calling out Muslims, they're a scourge, but I haven't seen any evidence of religious motivation at this stage.

 
Last edited:
That's alright. We now have a man at the helm of the free world that won't ignore these issues any longer.
 
Ah, another enriched individual who found the peaceful religion, then.
 
liberals are on a train that is going too fast and they cant jump off

"its like speed 2 but with a bus."
 
How is driving a car at people, killing four and injuring more, not considered Terrorism?

Maybe if the media didn't try to blackout these crimes, then ordinary people wouldn't be so suspicious of their agenda.

because its one person going on the rampage with household items. if napolean told him to do it, would we blame the french?
 
because its one person going on the rampage with household items. if napolean told him to do it, would we blame the french?

If that's the case then why were lefties calling Jo Cox's killer a "Far right terrorist"??

After all, he was one mentally unstable man, and definitely didn't represent the "far right".

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/nov/23/thomas-mair-found-guilty-of-jo-cox-murder

Far-right terrorist Thomas Mair jailed for life for Jo Cox murder

It seems like the media play by different rules depending on the perpetrator.
 
Last edited:
If that's the case then why we're lefties calling Jo Cox's killer a "Far right terrorist"??

After all, he was one mentally unstable man, and definitely didn't represent the "far right".

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/nov/23/thomas-mair-found-guilty-of-jo-cox-murder

It seems like the media play by different rules depending on the perpetrator.
definitely a political killing to assassinate a politician. i think the lefties as you call it are probably trapped between responding in kind, and fundamentally disagreeing with the categorisation.

if you and your mates happen to be racists, and inspired by stormfront, go out and shoot some people with darker skin than you, is it terrorism?

either way, it should be the same definition all round and not one that is self serving and disingenuous.
 
It was just a "parking emergency", also, let us not forget about "The Crusades"
 
Back
Top