- Joined
- Aug 20, 2009
- Messages
- 40,858
- Reaction score
- 21,769
This post is dumb, to wit,The article has an obvious bias. They mention how many minority votes were purged, yet leave out how many whites were so that the reader can't draw a comparison. They mention common minority last names, yet completely gloss over the fact there are countless Caucasian families that are Smiths, Millers, Johnsons, Williams, that too might have gotten purged. And anecdotally, considering the retarded first names many blackmothersfamilies give to their children, I'd say many of them are very much insulated from being confused with someone else.
"Swedlund's statistical analysis found that African-American, Latino and Asian names predominate, a simple result of the Crosscheck matching process, which spews out little more than a bunch of common names. No surprise: The U.S. Census data shows that minorities are overrepresented in 85 of 100 of the most common last names. If your name is Washington, there's an 89 percent chance you're African-American. If your last name is Hernandez, there's a 94 percent chance you're Hispanic. If your name is Kim, there's a 95 percent chance you're Asian."