King Conor has easily the best record vs the top 5 contenders at LW

[I_IZ_BACK]

Why are you using the rankings from January? Is it because in the February rankings immediately before the fight was announced he is #5 and that doesn’t fit your narrative?

No because Diaz' last fight was in december 2015, that's why I used the rankings from January.
Rankings in February (2/2): Diaz was #6 (https://www.mmamania.com/2017/2/9/1...e-korean-zombie-cracks-top-10-ufc-houston-mma).
Rankings in February (2/22): Diaz still #6 (https://www.mmamania.com/2017/2/14/...update-holly-holm-drops-two-spots-ufc-208-mma)
Right after the fight (3/7): Diaz is #8 (https://www.mmamania.com/2017/3/7/1...date-stephen-thompson-khabib-nurmagomedov-mma)

 

[Irishwhiskey119]

I added the finish as counting for more than just a round.
Guess you didn’t catch that.

Didn't catch your arbitrary throwing a finish in to count as a round? Oh, i caught it and it makes no sense so i intelligently ignored it.

Like i said 4-3. Conor has proven to be a better fighter and has came from a lower weight to do it.

Much more impressive. Plus we've seen Nate dominated many many times.

 

[markg171]

No because Diaz' last fight was in december 2015, that's why I used the rankings from January.
Rankings in February (2/2): Diaz was #6 (https://www.mmamania.com/2017/2/9/1...e-korean-zombie-cracks-top-10-ufc-houston-mma).
Rankings in February (2/22): Diaz still #6 (https://www.mmamania.com/2017/2/14/...update-holly-holm-drops-two-spots-ufc-208-mma)
Right after the fight (3/7): Diaz is #8 (https://www.mmamania.com/2017/3/7/1...date-stephen-thompson-khabib-nurmagomedov-mma)

You should try using the right rankings from 2016, not rankings from 2017. He was #5.

https://www.mmamania.com/2016/2/23/...hines-welterweight-debut-drops-four-spots-mma

 

[I_IZ_BACK]

You should try using the right rankings from 2016, not rankings from 2017. He was #5.

https://www.mmamania.com/2016/2/23/...hines-welterweight-debut-drops-four-spots-mma

my bad

 

[TheBulletwithWings]

Didn't catch your arbitrary throwing a finish in to count as a round? Oh, i caught it and it makes no sense so i intelligently ignored it.

Like i said 4-3. Conor has proven to be a better fighter and has came from a lower weight to do it.

Much more impressive. Plus we've seen Nate dominated many many times.

Never seen Nate finished by Conor but we’ve seen Conor finished by Nate.
I guess you can consider the extra round to be more significant.
Conor is better for the first round and a half, then he becomes a lesser fighter than Nate.

 

[Irishwhiskey119]

Never seen Nate finished by Conor but we’ve seen Conor finished by Nate.
I guess you can consider the extra round to be more significant.
Conor is better for the first round and a half, then he becomes a lesser fighter than Nate.

Conor doesn't need to finish Nate as he's won more rounds and won the last fight and has a much better record while winning two championships in different divisions while making way more money for himself and the company. Nate has never won a championship and has been beaten over and over.

Nate sucks. Conor is better.

Both are pieces of shit for sitting on the sidelines as long as they have.

 

[TheBulletwithWings]

Conor doesn't need to finish Nate as he's won more rounds and won the last fight and has a much better record while winning two championships in different divisions while making way more money for himself and the company. Nate has never won a championship and has been beaten over and over.

Nate sucks. Conor is better.

Both are pieces of shit for sitting on the sidelines as long as they have.

I agree with your final statement there so we will end on that.