- Joined
- Jul 21, 2014
- Messages
- 19,152
- Reaction score
- 71,507
Racist Realist Nationalist and demonetized from youtube.That kind of talk might get you branded in some parts of the World.
Branded with what I don't know though.
Racist Realist Nationalist and demonetized from youtube.That kind of talk might get you branded in some parts of the World.
Branded with what I don't know though.
I directly quoted your posts and you made a statement at the end that US is the ideal model. It's not the best, just different.
The world is over populated. That's the problem. A slow down in population isn't going to kill anything, this just sounds like big business freaking out that they can't get bigger.
http://www.businessinsider.com/japan-fertility-crisis-2017-4
"
The daily constraints have made for a worrisome trend. Japan has entered a vicious cycle of low fertility and low spending that has led to trillions in lost GDP and a population decline of 1 million people, all within just the past five years. If left unabated, experts forecast severe economic downturn and a breakdown in the fabric of social life.
Mary Brinton, a Harvard sociologist, tells Business Insider that the situation will get only worse until Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his cabinet get with the times. Of the ongoing crisis, she says, "This is death to the family.""
They are losing millions in population and trillions of dollars. Husband and wife working 16 hours a day. There's no snoo snoo time.
The only solution I see is for Japan to stop being racist and accept some migrants or see their old bigot ways go extinct. Acceptance or extinction? Your choice!! Thoughts?
JAV models. what could go wrong other than some nuclear leakage?What kind of migrants?
I would move there.
It may be simply that the reality of the very real need for the cultural adjustment to support their relative legacy of homogeneity hasn't forced enough pressure upon their corporate culture to trigger active shifts in priority.
Japanese can be rather fatalistic but I doubt the national will is there to simply allow themselves to dwindle away so eventually they will have to take pragmatic measures to deal with the issue. They will either open themselves to further cultural integration, up their numbers and keep their corporate industrial machine moving forward as usual or they will turn further inward and focus on social engineering to deal with the problem. Japan can be rather pragmatic on some things. Depends on where they believe their greater duty lays.
This is what you get when you not only make it nearly unfeasible but impractical to have a one income household. This is what you get when there is a concerted and long standing effort to damn near stigmatize the idea of motherhood as being possible of providing fulfillment or as a career in itself because it doesn't further a feminist goal. This is what you get when socially acceptable ages for eventual motherhood are pushed further and further back, This is what you get when you allow and even encourage the idea that stable two parent households are in the main unnecessary for a well balanced society.There is no desire for women to have more than 1 or 2 children on average. Whatever economic policy you implement or how much you encourage it.
The fact remains that given the economic choice and free choice women on average don't like to have more than 1 or 2 children.
This is poor standards. The Gulf countries treat foreign workers like cattle.
Also, there is no industry in Japan like the oil industry, where thousands of workers can be brought in buses and parked in some shithole next to an oil field.
Also, on topic, neo liberal economists are always quick to cry about "lost GDP". But opportunity cost (which is a subjective notion) does not mean cost.
This is what you get when you allow and even encourage the idea that stable two parent households are in the main unnecessary for a well balanced society.
This is what you get when you not only make it nearly unfeasible but impractical to have a one income household. This is what you get when there is a concerted and long standing effort to damn near stigmatize the idea of motherhood as being possible of providing fulfillment or as a career in itself because it doesn't further a feminist goal. This is what you get when socially acceptable ages for eventual motherhood are pushed further and further back, This is what you get when you allow and even encourage the idea that stable two parent households are in the main unnecessary for a well balanced society.
Women turn away from the notion of motherhood or delay it because society has by an large encouraged them to, or at the very at the very least delay it for longer and longer periods.
It WAS. At this point, its sort of a free for all. We used to bring in people who wanted to achieve but people don't want to achieve anymore, they want to receive.I believe that the United States' model of diversity and controlled immigration is a better model than that of Japan. I say that unabashedly and without hesitation. .
They probably would (deep down)rather cull the elderly than have selective vetted immigrationYou're an idiot, it has nothing to do with these made up reasons and everything to do with their inverted demographic pyramid. At some point there are going to be more adult diapers sold in Japan than baby diapers, its probably already the case in many specific locations within the country. Their population is aging rapidly and they're not anywhere close to replacement levels of fertility so they need a younger, working age population to support all the elderly. Policies designed to help boost fertility are sorely needed but those will take time to bear fruit, in the meantime migrants would help.
Or idk, maybe they could cull the elderly. Maybe you'd prefer that to them letting in migrants
Families with more than one or two children also generally used to incorporate older children in assisting with the younger. Not to say that's exactly a better option than simply having less children but it did also lead to tighter family cohesion in general because the family all contributed in their fashion to the success of the whole. Don't get me wrong, it has it's downside but it also allowed children moving into young adulthood to acquire familial skills as well. How to manager younger siblings as well as how to run a home as they took on a share of the chores.No, what you don't understand is that women simply know that they can be a much better mom to only one or two children compared to 5 or 6.
A mother only has 24 hours a day. That is why they choose to spend those 24 hours towards giving their attention to 1 or 2 is better compared to of 5 or 6.
You have to remember being a mother is most important job in the Reich. And free women have decided on average the best way to apply their time is to have 1 or 2 children.
No, what you don't understand is that women simply know that they can be a much better mom to only one or two children compared to 5 or 6.
A mother only has 24 hours a day. That is why they choose to spend those 24 hours towards giving their attention to 1 or 2 is better compared to of 5 or 6.
You have to remember being a mother is most important job in the Reich. And free women have decided on average the best way to apply their time is to have 1 or 2 children.
It WAS. At this point, its sort of a free for all. We used to bring in people who wanted to achieve but people don't want to achieve anymore, they want to receive.
I'd trade our system for Japan's in a second considering the era.