- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 76,757
- Reaction score
- 10,596
By 2/3Cut military spending in half.
By 2/3Cut military spending in half.
Everybody knew Clinton was going to win in a landslide. Cut it out. You don't know what would have happened.Everyone knows that Trump would have won if Bernie ran. It doesn't take a crystal ball to understand the basic logic of why a third party run would crush any Democrat's chances.
If Bernie stole a net 1% of the votes from Hillary (he would take some from Trump too) that would have tanked her campaign. 1% loss would lose to a GOP united around one candidate. And Bernie has a large following and would have certainly taken more of the vote than that. He may have taken one of the big electoral states from Hillary, but it would have only taken one of the states in the rust belt. You're being silly.
I think I thought of a single payer option that americans might get behind, and it also solves another massive issue
How about all adults now have to at least go to bootcamp......not mandatory service afterwards, but at least the basic training portion.
1) it opens up people's eyes, experiencing multiple cultures and walks of life coming together for a common task and purpose.
2) forces people to go through adversity, aka 'embrace the suck' something that surely is missing from such an entitled generation. Also going through it w/ other people (minorities, sexual orientation, religion, etc..) would likely lessen any lingering resentments or biases
3) then everyone gets put on a revamped, single payer version of the VA.....
4) forced exercise and dieting, maybe can go some way towards combating future obesity issues, thus lowering overall health care costs
5) perhaps even offer a minimized GI Bill to help w/ college funding, not the same for full tenured service veterans but something....
people won't resent paying for others that didn't earn it, it's patriotic in a way, can take some of the bloated DoD and VA budgets, etc....
obviously elderly/disabled/others would be grandfathered in, but this applies for both sexes too.
Who's with me?
He already redistributed his wealth to me.
I'm all for sending some of my shit head cousins to basic. Against their will haha.
You said Bernie dropped out because it would guarantee a Trump victory.
Bernie dropped out and Trump won.
So Bernie, why did you not run third party and break the wheel?
1. Supporters aren't worried about the cost? Only you are? Weird, an arrogant hipster like thing to proclaim seeing as I'm a supporter and I'm discussing the costs. Never one ever did I say, cost doesn't matter?
He didn't know Trump would win. Based on the information available at the time, he made the right decision. What possible benefit would be had by guaranteeing a big win for Trump? Bernie isn't as callous as a lot of his supporters.
I didn't say it was capitalism that was the system of failed design, nor did i say "fuck capitalism," you goddamn halfwit. You can have capitalism and retain market logic in a capitalist system that isn't corrupted to the impossible extent that the 2017 US political economy is.
Also, lol @ you thinking every poor person has those amenities. What a stupid fucking twat you are. You're completely denying the existence of the (considerable) indigent underclass in the richest country in the world, while glorifying its undisputedly flawed system of resource allocation, when meanwhile some of the poorest countries in the world are able to care for their poor with either radical reversals of capitalist logic or pragmatic democratic amendments to it.
all fair pts, i was just trying to combine our love (and funding) for defense w/ healthcare somehow, and education by proxyI wouldn't tie it to healthcare, but I think a year of service or something would be a good idea. Don't like the idea of forcing it, but maybe there can be a way to incentivize it. Maybe some tax benefit for employers who hire people who go through it, college credits, and a cash payout to the volunteers. Plus an ad campaign and attempts to normalize it culturally.
No, but he knew he didn't want Clinton as POTUS or he wouldn't have run at all. If he runs third party he has a chance.
This is also a more nuanced question than your giving credit. His answer of course would be"I didn't want Teump to win and I made a promise to the DNC that I wouldn't".
Yeah, well, Trump won and the DNC sabotaged you. So again, why didn't you run 3rd party?
And it's not callous at all. You can't expect change to occur by doing the same thing *looks at belly*looks over at unused gym membership
all fair pts, i was just trying to combine our love (and funding) for defense w/ healthcare somehow, and education by proxy
i also firmly believe those pts about lessening racial bias and other things.
I believe Sanders got into the race because he saw a steady drift to the the right from the party that had traditionally represented the left.He wanted to be president. I don't think he had any particular problem with Clinton winning if he couldn't. And what I mean by callous is that a lot of people are hurt by bad policy. For example, we came very close to millions of Americans losing their healthcare coverage. That would be a really tough thing for a guy like Bernie to have on his conscience. It's easy for a lot of us with relatively comfortable lives to say, "it's worth a short-term setback to blow everything up and restart," but what about people who are on the border and are seriously hurt by that short-term setback?
Agreed.
An ad hominem (two words, not possessive) is a logical fallacy wherein somebody says that the reason you are wrong is because you are a stupid twat. He provided actual argument, and called you a stupid twat, but did not rest his arguments on the latter. That is what we call an insulting observation, not an ad hominem.Adhominem's
I win, just like Capitalism won the Cold War. GG EZ
An ad hominem (two words, not possessive) is a logical fallacy wherein somebody says that the reason you are wrong is because you are a stupid twat. He provided actual argument, and called you a stupid twat, but did not rest his arguments on the latter. That is what we call an insulting observation, not an ad hominem.
Adhominem's
I win, just like Capitalism won the Cold War. GG EZ
Sounds like you have a dog in this fight.Right, which is why I want to know why single payer is better than fixing those failings. Personally, I don't think it is.
I agree with a focus on reducing healthcare costs (drug prices are a good start) and agree that the goal should be 100% coverage, but we do not need a single payer to accomplish those.
I haven't seen Bernie mount a good defense against the problems with a single payer.
if you listen to the average bernie speech on the campaign trail and replace "millionaires", "billionaires", "1%ers" etc. with "jews" then he makes the exact same arguments that hitler made about greedy jewish bankers ruining germany
its funny that people act like his was the message of love
Sounds like you have a dog in this fight.
If you take the phrase "murdering is bad" and replace "murdering" with "potato" you basically have nonsense. I guess that means murdering is bad is a nonsense phrase???? wow. crazy how changing words in a sentence changes the meaning.if you listen to the average bernie speech on the campaign trail and replace "millionaires", "billionaires", "1%ers" etc. with "jews" then he makes the exact same arguments that hitler made about greedy jewish bankers ruining germany
its funny that people act like his was the message of love
I believe he answered something along those lines at a debate. He had some decent redmeat answer about a bipartisan bill he worked on helping veterans.
If you take the phrase "murdering is bad" and replace "murdering" with "potato" you basically have nonsense. I guess that means murdering is bad is a nonsense phrase???? wow. crazy how changing words in a sentence changes the meaning.