Conor took risk that he had to @ Feathweight...Which is why he chose featherweight, to fight manlets(He was always a true lightweight if he didn't cut/kill himself)...Yes it's a risk but it was risk he was willing to take because Conor knows manlets are an easy matchup for him
He will duck non-manlets...Which are ferguson/Lee...but if they have the title, he will fight them, but trust me, he will avoid them if he can, when they have no title.
Holloway was a fucking nobody back then with a meh record....extremely green and he was injured but so was Conor.
The fight that makes most sense in terms of proving he is a great fighter, is Ferguson/Lee....both way tougher fights for Conor than Aldo/Nate.
I'm sorry dude but you've gone full retard on this one.
If that's your stance on him fighting at FW, then what do you think of Till, Holloway, Khabib, Ortega, and gsps potential LW fights?
Just to name a few.
Don't get me wrong, I agree to some extent cos I do agree that most fighters aren't fighting in their weight class but to use it as an excuse to single out one, is a bit odd.
As for rda, Alverez, Khabib and nate at 170 - they aren't FW fighters and the scheduled fights defo weren't at FW.
Ye, ye, ye - it was mcgs second ufc fight, it was what, 5 or 6 for Holloway? They were both a lot greener back then.
Regardless,the fight happened and one won convincingly.
Ferguson is in a weird place right now but you really have to get off the Lee talk, it's just ludicrous.
We all know that fight makes no sense in any way.
If you're trying to say he's an idiot or pussy for taking calculated risks, then I'm equally as confused....