- Joined
- Jun 27, 2013
- Messages
- 19,889
- Reaction score
- 18,430
Even when there was one guy sitting at the top of the food chain, there were at least one or two other people who also given that treatment.
Austin/Rock/HHH/Foley
Hogan/Savage/Andre
Cena/HHH/Orton
This isn't the highlander. The WWE has who-knows how many hours of programming every week. Why can't there be more than one top dog? Why is this their dogma?
The HHH treatment has been used on Reigns for 3 or 4 years. The HHH treatment is to push someone until he gets over. Pick a guy and do what they did with HHH in 1998-2000.
I remember Mick Foley telling a story about how Stephanie asked him what they can get Billy Gunn over. I was thinking "what should you do with Billy Gunn?. Act as if he is Triple H and go from there. Put him in a match and have him win. The next week put him in a match and have him win. Guess what happens the next week and the week afterwards.
- If his song isn't working, give him a new song. HHH's song changed 3 or 4 times in that period.
- His gear changed more than once.
- His hair changed more than once.
- The way he cut promos changed.
- More importantly, he hardly ever lost. Even when it didn't make sense for him to win, he didn't lose.
Push Cesaro as if his John Cena. Pretend Ambrose is Austin in 1997 and go from there. So on and so forth. If he doesn't achieve the Cena level, oh well go back to the drawing board.
Billy Gunn was a can.