- Joined
- Sep 9, 2016
- Messages
- 2,152
- Reaction score
- 3
Outside of the obvious (being Conor v khabib is bigger than gsp)
That is the noobiest thing to say that a noob ever noobed.
Outside of the obvious (being Conor v khabib is bigger than gsp)
We have Knuckles vs Romero II at MW, why are you crying?I know a bunch of healthy dudes at mw
Also
Interesting he’s willing to go to a division with a bunch of hurt fighters , to fight for the title.
That is the noobiest thing to say that a noob ever noobed.
He's defended his WW title for years. He immediately vacated the MW belt when he was having medical problems which made it clear he couldn't fight at that weight. There is no reason to say he wouldn't defend at LW.What does that have to do with me saying he shouldn't get a title shot if he won't defend it?
That's fine. I don't have a problem with him getting a shot if he will defend, I have a problem with fighters getting shots if they won't.He's defended his WW title for years. He immediately vacated when he was having medical problems which made it clear he couldn't fight at that weight. There is no reason to say he wouldn't defend at LW.
Good point. it wouldn't cause it but it could have exacerbated it.Even without medication, people with this condition can't eat alot or it would make the symptoms worse.
And it brings into question if it was the constant eating which he said he did to bulk up for 185 caused the colitis.
no one but GSP himself knows for sure if he would defend. I think he would. You never know for sure if a fighter will defend. But we know at the very least he wouldn't hold up the division, both times he vacated he did it quickly, none of this holding on to the belt as long as possible stuff.That's fine. I don't have a problem with him getting a shot if he will defend, I have a problem with fighters getting shots if they won't.
I'd like to see title defense clauses being included in the contracts for challengers. Where they agree to defend against a chosen challenger of the organization's choice at a certain set date or event (with possible rescheduling) before they even get the chance to win the belt. And they can get sued once they start playing games. That would stop all this shit before it started.no one but GSP himself knows for sure if he would defend. I think he would. You never know for sure if a fighter will defend. But we know at the very least he wouldn't hold up the division, both times he vacated he did it quickly, none of this holding on to the belt as long as possible stuff.
they'd have to make fighters employees and the UFC is not going to do that.I'd like to see title defense clauses being included in the contracts for challengers. Where they agree to defend against a chosen challenger of the organization's choice at a certain set date or event (with possible rescheduling) before they even get the chance to win the belt. And they can get sued once they start playing games. That would stop all this shit before it started.
Conor vs anyone at 155 or 170 is the biggest fight for that guy. GSP vs anyone at 155 or 170 is the second biggest fight for that guy. Everyone knows that.
That is the noobiest thing to say that a noob ever noobed.
???The only problem with this is, they are willing to give McGregor an immediate title shot even though he's "Notorious" for never defending belts, but don't want to give GSP a shot because they're afraid for the same reason.