*RETARD ALERT*
Let's analyse that stupid shit you just posted for a second...
I'm guessing you're new to MMA, because calling that ''the biggest robbery in UFC history'' makes you look borderline retarded. Ever heard of Machina vs Rua 1? Penn vs Edgar 1?
People who scored it for Hendricks are emotional little snowflakes. I'll school you a bit on the MMA judging system: you fight for 5 rounds, and each round is scored either 10-9 if you won, 10-8 if you absolutely dominated or 10-10 if it's a tie.
Hendricks clearly won 2 rounds. GSP clearly won 2 rounds. No one in their right mind can argue that. It all came down to round 1, where GSP got a sub attempt and Hendricks got a takendown, whichever you value more wins the round. Idiots like you talk like Hendricks won a landslide decision of 5-0... It was 3-2 GSP, if you're biased you can score it 2-3 Hendricks or a draw, but bottom line is, GSP won (by a small margin) but still won, it wasn't a robbery, just a close fight.
The standards for GSP are insanely high it's almost comical... the guy WINS a split decision and somehow that ruins his legacy. Meanwhile Jones pops continuously for roids, Silva too + has a 20% win rate in the past 3 years, Fedor is a 0.500 fighter now and has a losing record in the US, but they're all great.
