- Joined
- Aug 19, 2006
- Messages
- 6,240
- Reaction score
- 1,434
Will people be happy if Trump does an excellent job as a president?
is this recount math correct?
clinton 232 to trump 290, with 16 MI not yet counted
MI = 16
PA = 20
WI = 10
clinton = 232 + 10 + 16 + 20 = 268, loser
trump = 290 - 20 - 10 = 270, winner
so its still 268-270 even if those recounted states swing to clinton? whats the point of the recount then? just to cast doubt over the process? surely if "russian hacking" were identified in any amount for either candidate, there would need to be consideration of a nationwide recount, not just cherry-picking those swing state counties where trump won.
232 + 10 + 16 + 20 = 278
290 - 20 - 10 = 260
She'd have to get all 3, though. I doubt she gets any.
As a caveat, I don't think this will show anything, believe Stein is attention whoring, and did not support her action here. However, it is legal.
So, if a nonpartisan commission found irrefutably clear evidence that Trump receenough net fraudulent votes to win the election, your response would be civil war?
Or are you confusing pursuing legal channels with civil war?
How can a racist biggot do a good job of being president? Hate crimes have gone up like 400% since his election and it's only been two weeks.Will people be happy if Trump does an excellent job as a president?
How can a racist biggot do a good job of being president? Hate crimes have gone up like 400% since his election and it's only been two weeks.
So you admit he's the legit president elect, at least.How can a racist biggot do a good job of being president? Hate crimes have gone up like 400% since his election and it's only been two weeks.
Dirty Donald is a white supremacist by his own admission.What you meant to say is hate crime hoaxes. There's a growing list of them, each one more embarrassing and hysterical than the last. It's sad knowing that you simpletons have to stoop so low as to fake being victims.
i myself do not believe the results were monkeyed with, but i'm surprised how this issue has upset folks.
It's the very suspicious way in which it's all coming together that concerns people. Supposed computer experts raise doubts over the election to the Clinton campaign. 1% Jill Stein comes out of nowhere, and raises the funds for a recount so quickly and just in the nick of time. Funds that more than double the funds raised for her entire campaign, might I add. All the States targeted for a recount are narrowly won Trump states that could conveniently swing the election, with other states being won by Clinton by even narrower margins not being targets. And now, after Jill Stein has raised the funds, the Clinton campaign joins her efforts.
The whole thing just reeks. Everything is a little too convenient.
How do them male tittes of yours look op?How am I balls deep inside your head then? You're rustled as all fuck you salty redneck.
'afternoon, HereticBD,
she's raised a shade under 4 million dollars...i don't see how that is some staggering sum. in the big picture, it's a pretty paltry amount of money.