- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 7,270
- Reaction score
- 49
I don't think either fighter wants to walk through that hell againBoth bad decisions for GGG. Both good decisions for business. Canelo vs GGG 3 next year lol.
I don't think either fighter wants to walk through that hell againBoth bad decisions for GGG. Both good decisions for business. Canelo vs GGG 3 next year lol.
Patently falseCanelo lost. He was rocked multiple times at the end. GGG out jabbed him by a huge margin and the power punches landed were almost even. 115-113 GGG all day
The fact that Golovkins own trainer had it a draw says everything we need to know.
CANELO HATERS :
<{CMPALM}> LA LA LA LA LA !! I DIDN'T SEE IT, SO IT NEVER HAPPENED.
Why do people say Canelo landed the best punches when it was GGG snapping his head back all night. I rewatched it and Canelo didn't do as good as I originally thought 4-5 rounds at best, can't even justify a draw which is what I originally thought
He got robbed in the first fight, not in this one. This was a fight that could've gone either way. I have no problem whatsoever with the decision.
I'm thoroughly disappointed in Golovkin's effort. At this point, he might as well call it a career if he's going to fight like that. He's old, slow and he's taken a lot of damage.
It's a shame cause he had so much potential early on, but Loeffler did him no favors by matching him carefully just to position him for a money fight. He should've been fighting upper echelon fighters earlier.
GGG looked terrible the first half. It's okay if you want to think GGG won but there's no way in hell he was "robbed"
Not in this fight in particular but it leaves a bad taste in the mouth of neutrals (like me) that one guy got a rough decision in two fights.
Plus Canelo only really got a slap on the wrist for his positive drug test compared to what he would have got with USADA.
Tell me about how USADA, which abides by WADA code, would have sanctioned him worse than he received.
Maybe they wouldn’t.
I remember they were very soft on Morales when he tested positive for clen.
Nevertheless every case is different and Alvarez’s T:E ratio, overall T level etc. might have seemed more unnatural than for Morales.
Clearly Álvarez looks much more like he’s on steroids than that skinny fat version of Morales.
kicked GGG's ass? You must be blind
Canelo won both times. The just bleed idiots got the stand and bang fight they wanted. Canelo kicked GGG's ass yet they still complain.
.
dude should get fired..Lol this will get ignored Abel himself said no robbery
Repeat The trainer for GGG said Canelo won no robbery
This is so fucking ridiculous.
Boxing fans are simply triggered to cry robbery anytime things don't go as they planned.
There was no robbery here, and the right man won the fight.
GGG and his staunch supporters need to learn how to accept defeat instead of being babies. He lost fair and square.
Thats what I was saying earlier about people scoring power. Golovkin lands a punch to open the round and nothing Caenlo can do will make up for it to fans who score like that.Patently false
What happened to Golovkin there? Because people in this thread say he barely got hit.
To be fair, that was the New York Athletic Commission, not Nevada.I remember they were very soft on Morales when he tested positive for clen.
Nevertheless every case is different and Alvarez’s T:E ratio, overall T level etc. might have seemed more unnatural than for Morales.