Freddie Roach had it 7 to 5 for GGG.

[liljoe]

 

[Seano]

So he agrees it was a close fight. Good.

 

[CatchnShoot]

AND that Adelaide Byrd was out to lunch.

 

[Ling Ling]

I thought it was 8-4 but some rounds were so close that 7-5 is entirely reasonable.

 

[Shoemaker]

AND that Adelaide Byrd was out to lunch.

Has anyone tried to legitimately defend that she wasn't?

 

[JayE]

Has anyone tried to legitimately defend that she wasn't?

I think Bennett did, but I'm pretty sure he did it with full knowledge that the NSAC is pretty much untouchable and therefore can claim whatever they want.

 

[wilddeuces]

Has anyone tried to legitimately defend that she wasn't?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I had it the same as Adelaide Byrd. Excellent card.</p>&mdash; CJ Ross (@CJRossJudge) <a href="">September 17, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[CatchnShoot]

lol

 

[Shoemaker]

I think Bennett did, but I'm pretty sure he did it with full knowledge that the NSAC is pretty much untouchable and therefore can claim whatever they want.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I had it the same as Adelaide Byrd. Excellent card.</p>&mdash; CJ Ross (@CJRossJudge) <a href="">September 17, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Ugh that sucks. Byrd at least has the benefit of the doubt when it comes to the viewing angle. I know some people here only gave Golovkin 2 rounds, too, but I really can't justify that at all.

That said, it seems like the people defending the 118-110 card are the splinter-thin minority and it's not a particularly interesting debate to have. Arguing against that card is like arguing against Flat Earth theory. It doesn't even deserve acknowledgement, let alone serious discussion. In my opinion, anyway.

 

[Shoemaker]

lol

I wasn't taking a side shot at you, it was a genuine question. And from what I can tell, a legitimate one if only the NSAC director and CJ f***ing Ross are the ones trying. And from what I read, Bennet didn't defend her card. He said outright she had a bad night.

There might be more, but it's a virtually inaudible minority. As well it should be, too. That card sucked.

 

[Shoemaker]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I had it the same as Adelaide Byrd. Excellent card.</p>&mdash; CJ Ross (@CJRossJudge) <a href="">September 17, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Oh fuck you and that Twitter account.

*stomps away*

 

[Sunfish]

Oh fuck you and that Twitter account.

*stomps away*

Lol, fake cj Ross by ko.

 

[Strange King]

That's how I scored it

 

[rvzu]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I had it the same as Adelaide Byrd. Excellent card.</p>&mdash; CJ Ross (@CJRossJudge) <a href="">September 17, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Strange King]

Lol, fake cj Ross by ko.

how did you score the fight?

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

And he would be right...likr most sane people

 

[Kovalev's "Man Bag"]

Had the same score as Roach

 

[Sunfish]

how did you score the fight?

115-113 golovkin.

 

[Strange King]

115-113 golovkin.

yay were twinsies

 

[Strange King]

And he would be right...likr most sane people

how did you score the fight?