- Joined
- Nov 22, 2010
- Messages
- 10,993
- Reaction score
- 35,779
secret negotiations were happening long before tony Blair.
It's not so much religion, Catholics v Protestants, more ethnic Irish v English and politics, I.e. Reunify Ireland .Apart from killing and torturing random people because of their religious beliefs, and blowing up public buildings at busy times of the day if they didn't get what they wanted, no. No comparison at all.
There probably were many half-assed attempts at truces/ceasefires all throughout the Conservative governments of Thatcher and Major, but their attitude towards it was that, half-assed, "let's just ignore 'em"secret negotiations were happening long before tony Blair.
It's not so much religion, Catholics v Protestants, more ethnic Irish v English and politics, I.e. Reunify Ireland .
I have never once heard of someone wanting to "Make Ireland Catholic". Not even once!
I would argue religion was a thin layer of division. But, the main layers being ethnicity and politics.I don't either. However, the IRA were a catholic seperatist organization whose activities included murdering random protestant civilians. Just like the Ulster Defense Association were a protestant loyalist organization whose activities included murdering random catholic civilians. A united Ireland was the main goal of the IRA, but it was very much about religion also.
Good typical meat head rant, as usual supported with aggressive foul language and non-sensical assertions with zero logical back up, really all it does is support the thesis of big mouths goings hand in hand with puny little brains. "When you attack white people, you are attacking the world! Like, oh my God." "Like, it's not the third world, so it's like, so important." "Guilt got is into this mess!" "It's what's near and dear to us!" - like Kim Kardashian's ass and Kanye's hangnail.
LIke talking to a fifteen year old.
I haven't either. However, the IRA were a catholic seperatist organization whose activities included murdering random protestant civilians. Just like the Ulster Defense Association were a protestant loyalist organization whose activities included murdering random catholic civilians. A united Ireland was the main goal of the IRA, but it was very much about religion also.
I would argue religion was a thin layer of division. But, the main layers being ethnicity and politics.
Ethnicity and political viewpoint played a much larger role of division than what church you went to on a Sunday morning.
I'm not going to deny that many many sectarian atrocitys were perpetrated by republicans but at no point were the officials, provisionals or INLA ever a catholic separatist organisation
They weren't murdered for being Protestant.I'm not debating this, I agree it was a political stand-off that ignited an already volitile situation between two religious groups leading to the troubles in N.Ireland. I'm just not seeing how the IRA murdering random civilians for being protestant is any more reasonable than ISIS murdering random civilians for not being a bat-shit crazy muslim extremist.
They weren't murdered for being Protestant.
To be sure, can we all agree that any organization that supports setting off bombs (nail or otherwise) in public spaces is composed of scum, and any who would claim affiliation with such a group as supports those actions should also be rightly called out for being scum?
You have been a part of SD this long and you think that people will agree to this, that's funny
I was more interested to see who would loudly argue against that and in defence of what group.
You make the IRA sound like really reasonable. They were scum and they set nail bombs off in crowded pubs and supermarkets. Our government did deal with terrorists (even though they said they never would) and set several murderers free from prison with no consequences.
The only difference is they were fighting another terrorist faction* and ISIS just seem to want to fight anyone and everyone.
*The UK was a protestant country then so the news was highly in favour of the Ulster Unionists and painted the IRA out to be the only terrorist faction.
You may or may not be on IRA's side but IRA's scope was very targeted and IRA didn't target civilians outside of the British Isles as far as I know.
That's a major fucking difference, isn't it.
IRA killed people in Ireland in the UK that they associated with the occupation of Ireland. You may or may not be on IRA's side but IRA's scope was very targeted and IRA didn't target civilians outside of the British Isles as far as I know.
Compare that with ISIS that targets anybody and has killed civilians of many nationalities and religions on 3 continents. Some in the name of Iraq's and Syria's occupation. Some in the name of religion. Many in the most gruesome and cruel way.
It does sound like you are comparing ISIS and IRA with that sentence. I doubt that it is what you meant. Otherwise you are just a nihilist that can't be helped and I really feel sorry for your messed up head and ignorance.
I'm not debating this, I agree it was a political stand-off that ignited an already volitile situation between two religious groups leading to the troubles in N.Ireland. I'm just not seeing how the IRA murdering random civilians for being protestant is any more reasonable than ISIS murdering random civilians for not being a bat-shit crazy muslim extremist.
Oh, I see. You are actually comparing ISIS with IRA.
Tell me, has the IRA killed any protestant outside of the British Isles ? Were protestant Swiss or Norwegians ever in danger of being blown up by the IRA ?
Mmmktxsbye.
In any ase, I award you the day's Golden Relativist. Great work.
P.s. : no need to mention the Crusades if you feel like justifying your miserable argumentation.