Ok let me try to put this a different way. Humans are omnivores. We have been omnivores for as long as we have fossils. Humans today have traits common with BOTH herbivores and omnivores. This is what I am defending. We today have more traits that we share with herbivores than we do with omnivores
False. Our intestines (shorter than any of our primate relatives, more in line with omnivores like pigs), teeth, digestive enzymes (I see you ignored the bile / gall bladder question), atherosclerotic patterns, everything points to being omnivores.
Now in the past, as humans began to eat more animal products, our bodies have been evolving, growing to favor animal products.
"began to eat"? Humans have been eating animals since we've been human or longer. The idea that humans ever survived on a plant-based diet is absent from archeoanthropological literature - you know, the people that ACTUALLY STUDY EARLY HUMANS. Revisionist vegan history doesn't compare to actual science.
Today, our society consumes more animal products than ever before. As we continue this trend, we will continue to evolve to favor animal products. We will gain more and more omnivorous traits, and lose more and more herbivorous traits.
This is simple nonsense. Any anthropologist will tell you that humans have, at various times, eaten primarily animal-based diets. You think humans ate apples and lettuce during the Ice Age? Ask an anthropologist about all the times a early human campsite is dug up, and almost no signs of food other than animal bones were found.
However, and this is the whole point I have been trying to make, if you were to rewind the film of evolution, the further back you go, the less omnivorous traits you would find, and the more herbivorous traits you would find. Now does this mean that eventually you would find humans being 100% herbivorous? No, I'm not claiming that at all. I'm fine with humans always being omnivorous. But back then, our bodies were MUCH more suitable for a herbivorous lifestyle.
The science does not bear this out, in a number of ways. One, where do you set your arbitrary "far enough back" line? Why not go further than that? Why not less? I'll go with the separation of humans from other early hominids (
sapiens). There is no evidence that suggest that true humans were not avid consumers of animal foods whenever they could be found. There is even some compelling evidence to suggest that humans' evolution to having powerful brains was fueled by consumption of energy-dense and fatty-acid dense animal foods such as seafood, marrow, and brains.
Evolution can lead to near full adaptation over several hundred thousand years, which we've had. There's no reason to think that the diet that humanity (homo sapiens) ate for most of its existence - rich in animal foods and fats in addition to vegetables and fruits - has not been fully adapted to.
Basically: (citation needed)
here we are today. We still have many herbivorous traits, and we had even more in the past. So by rewinding evolution, you can see that the human body was designed in a way that benefited from a herbivorous life style. Evolution allows us the luxury of being omnivores, but that doesn't mean that the human body was designed to eat meat. Our body today is more equipped for animal products than our ancestors, but even today we still are not as well suited as other omnivores.
PSS. Come someone really tell me how to quote sections? lol
No, we have omnivorous traits. Loads of them. Nothing but them. Herbivorous traits by definition would be present in herbivores but not omnivores. We lack traits of both true herbivores and true carnivores, and have for our entire existence as a species.
If you're going to say that humans evolved in a way that goes against accepted knowledge in science, you should post studies to back it up. Not fact sheets that were debunked the week after they came out in the 70's.
You can multi-quote by hitting the "reply" button, then putting "[ / quote]" without spaces at the end of the section you wish to address, then putting "[ quote]" at the front of the rest.
You should also take another look at the links I provided, or just research the matter yourself. I've studied nutrition and biological sciences for years, and even my vegan evolutionary biology professor admitted that humans have always eaten meat. He just said that we had a moral obligation not to.
Remember that this moral obligation to save the animals means that zealous vegans will deliberately spread misinformation to trick people into doing the right thing, from their point of view. I don't blame them any more than the door-to-door evangelists who are really just trying to save my soul.