Democrat Congresswoman Calls Millions Of Americans "Domestic Security Threats"

And that is different from Venezuela, or any other socialist "paradise", how?

The Nazis were a Socialist Party. Liberals and leftists have to own their own bad seed.

It's completely different. And you're a silly dumb head for not being able to see the difference.
 
In your opinion, is that the only interpretation or analysis possible from the words spoken in the videos in question?

Is there no other possible way that an individual could interpret those words?
It's a pretty easy interpretation to make though, isn't it? It's like people want to play stupid and forget that the message is coming from the NRA!

To directly answer your question, it can certainly be interpreted other ways but that can be said for just about anything. That is easy to interpret though.
 
Also, the title of this thread is completely disingenuous. It's clear she meant the organization and that particular spokesperson, not all NRA members.


#FAKENEWS



The NRA had $227,811,279 in total revenue that year, including:

  • $100,531,465 (44%) from member dues.
  • $ 58,572,260 (26%) from personal contributions.
  • $ 20,922,249 (9.2%) from the sale of advertising space
  • $ 12,573,541 (5.5%) contributions from "related organizations"
  • $ 11,745,200 (5.2%) came from selling stuff.
  • $ 11,303,074 (5.0%) came from royalties.
 
He's just calling me "Brown Nazi" because I'm middle eastern and conservative, there's no thought behind it


Trump is classified as far-right via attempting to roll Obama-era policy back to Clinton-era policy. Pretty sure the Clinton government was a Nazi dictatorship according to this equation.

Bill used to hunt gays on safari & being a '90s Jew was a constant struggle for survival.

{<huh}{<huh}{<huh}
 
Bill Clinton would be far-right if elected today

Oh, that's silly (and--goes without saying--not backed up with anything but an assertion).

Here's DW-NOMINATE scores:

polar_house_means_2014.png
 
Nazi Germany was sooooo Socialist they set aside a death camp for Socialists.
 
Oh, that's silly (and--goes without saying--not backed up with anything but an assertion).

Here's DW-NOMINATE scores:

polar_house_means_2014.png

Isn't the DW-NOMINATE model based on partisan voting homogeneity in congress (as opposed to overall shifts in national policy)? Both parties could move left in absolute ideology while still polarizing within congress. I never disputed polarization or the GOP's modern reactionary nature.

Note the lack of a massive DNC dip in the 1960s, during the large centrist exodus. That would represent actual ideology as opposed to congressional loyalty.

The NRA has always been the same. It's just more 'shocking' to modern sensibilities given that the organization was founded by cowboys and we've since moved to the left of everything sans Western Europe.
 
Last edited:
You didn't answer the question. Is North Korea a Democracy?

Nor is it a republic. However, you can't outright rewrite history and pretend they weren't a socialist party when their platform was state-run jobs for workers, free education, Nationalized Healthcare and gun control.
 
If you can't see how NAZI GERMANY is different from Venezuela... then there is no hope in me trying to explain it to you.
That wasn't my question. What's sad is that you already know this.

What is the difference between Nazi Germany socialism and Venezuela's socialism?

They both descended into brutal, murderous dictatorships, and they're both socialist.

Again you've made an assertion and refused to provide any evidence for it. Simply grabbing your clutching pearls in disbelief is not evidence.
 
I don't like defending the NRA because they've shown themselves to be grossly insensitive by showing up to funerals and the like, but I'm not sure what constitutes a domestic threat. Don't they also teach gun safety and promote legal gun ownership?

Without citing a specific policy, this is just rhetoric.
 
I don't like defending the NRA because they've shown themselves to be grossly insensitive by showing up to funerals and the like, but I'm not sure what constitutes a domestic threat. Don't they also teach gun safety and promote legal gun ownership?

Without citing a specific policy, this is just rhetoric.
You don't need a policy position to call for violence do you?
 
A Democratic congresswoman from New York on Thursday night accused the National Rifle Association and its spokeswoman of being "domestic threats" to the security of the United States.

Rep. Kathleen Rice took aim at the NRA and syndicated talk radio host Dana Loesch on Twitter, writing that "we can't ignore" the threats they pose under President Donald Trump.









http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/10/kathleen-rice-nra-dana-loesch-threats-national-sec/


Democrats in this country continuing to demonize gun owners while knowing fuck all about them outside of what the New York Times tells you about them. Most people don't even know, the NRA gets more than half of it's funding from Members (aka American Citizens). Funny, Democrats wouldn't never make a statement like this against Islam, and foreign gang affiliates, that actually torture and murder but as long as keep the narrative that white gun owners are the problem, it's all good.

She's totally right.
 
Back
Top