My point is people want fighters to earn more, have more say, get more of a voice in how MMA advances and so on so forth. They do that except they then get mad when fighters want more money regardless of their drawing power or not. Or when a fighter says "I don't think that fight is good for my brand, how about Fighter B instead of Fighter A?" Or when a fighter turns down a short notice fight because there's too much risk or etc etc etc. They get mad at fighters who can sit out because they can afford to when they earn 300K/300K or whatever. When Rashad Evans turned down Glover Teix in Brazil a loong time ago because he didn't need to take a fight like that when he was financially secure, people were outraged.
Look at the responses to Mighty Mouse, Woodley, McGregor etc etc. When fighters flex leverage, people get upset.
Folks in general (not directed this at you), want fighters to have more, earn more, do more inside the UFC----until it starts to inconvenience the product they're watching.