Cory Booker: homophobic hypocrite

So he actually opposes him because of tweets and because doesn't like his news sources?

I'm assuming Booker does oppose him for his politics, but how is this different from the entire left wing claiming anyone who opposed Obama was clearly for racist, or Hillary blaming sexism for not winning?

Because that's an outright lie and I have absolutely no doubt that you know that.

I suppose "Hillary blaming sexism for not winning" is accurate, even if woefully unrepresentative, since she did reference sexism in the attacks against her and, probably accurately, said it was a major factor against her candidacy. But at no point was even a meaningfully percentage of the left, let alone "the entire left wing" claiming anyone who opposed Obama was racist.

While racism obviously did play a role in resistance to Obama (birth certificate/Kenyan birth, Muslim, race war, "deep hatred for white people," globalist, etc.), I think the primary reason for unreasonable disdain for him was the product of stupidity and reliance on right-wing con men and profiteers, not individual racism.
 
Well, I’ll grant you liberals may have kinky sex, but there’s a good chance you’ll find a surprise under that dress.


Wel if that was the case I’m sure some closeted evangelical is under than dress blowing the guy/girl.

Nothing says wild sex like right wing religious fundamentalism
 
Last edited:
So he actually opposes him because of tweets and because doesn't like his news sources?

I'm assuming Booker does oppose him for his politics, but how is this different from the entire left wing claiming anyone who opposed Obama was clearly for racist, or Hillary blaming sexism for not winning?
Holy over-generalization Batman!
 
Last edited:
Did you see the other thread about the hat being taken at knife point? He's on a roll with these shitposts
He's got to be a former banned poster who is one of those loons that likes to play a character online then rebirths into a different one.
 
1.4/10


The left has now been reduced to denying the existence of humanity is dependent upon men and women reproducing.



Smdh...

I thought the world was dependent upon baby Jesus, and you being pure so he doesn't dry your lady's womb. It's hilarious to hear an ultra conservative like your whore ass talk about people not accepting science. I would be surprised if you had opposable thumbs, much less a woman who wasn't a jar of mayonnaise.
 
you still have not answered my question Bob.



That’s because reading your posts is like reading a transcript from a 7th graders tantrum. It’s a pile of weak insults which you mistake for, well, I don’t know what you think it is, but it’s embarrassing.




Plus, you know, the continuation of the human species requires mating between the sexes. So whatever point you’re about to bring up is stupid. Because if men and women didn’t make babies, especially during the early very difficult years of our species, we’d be extinct.





Only a liberal could possibly argue against this.
 
I thought the world was dependent upon baby Jesus, and you being pure so he doesn't dry your lady's womb. It's hilarious to hear an ultra conservative like your whore ass talk about people not accepting science. I would be surprised if you had opposable thumbs, much less a woman who wasn't a jar of mayonnaise.



Again, I have no interest in left and right wing outrage porn topics such as abortion, religion, etc.


It’s a real bad look when you attempt to use those topics to get a passionate response from me. It also demonstrates your complete inability to grasp why the left alienated so much of the country in 16. A little self reflection is desperately needed for you and @Cake4Breakfast.

You think you’re doing the left favors, you’re the cancer in the party driving off normal people.
 
That’s because reading your posts is like reading a transcript from a 7th graders tantrum. It’s a pile of weak insults which you mistake for, well, I don’t know what you think it is, but it’s embarrassing.




Plus, you know, the continuation of the human species requires mating between the sexes. So whatever point you’re about to bring up is stupid. Because if men and women didn’t make babies, especially during the early very difficult years of our species, we’d be extinct.





Only a liberal could possibly argue against this.

You still have not answered my question Bob. And you calling my insults weak, right after you said my posts where like a 7th graders is hilarious given that you got the idea for that insult from me when I called you a middle schooler yesterday.<Lmaoo>
 
Again, I have no interest in left and right wing outrage porn topics such as abortion, religion, etc.


It’s a real bad look when you attempt to use those topics to get a passionate response from me. It also demonstrates your complete inability to grasp why the left alienated so much of the country in 16. A little self reflection is desperately needed for you and @Cake4Breakfast.

You think you’re doing the left favors, you’re the cancer in the party driving off normal people.

What are you babbling about me thinking I am "doing the left favors?" Who writes shit like that?<Lmaoo>
 
Do you two geniuses ever make posts that actually address a topic or make a substantive point? Or is insulting thread starters pretty much your only thing now?

Look at what Geese has done here: he at least tries to make a point related to the topic. Be more like Bob Geese. And less like a pedophile and a guy who suffered a brain injury and now has the mind of a child (respectively).

Also, that just made me realize: Palis, on the off-chance that you are a child, please please do not PM oleDirtyBastard.

Which one is a pedo? We need a fucking sticky list on the rightie pedos in the WR.
 
Again, I have no interest in left and right wing outrage porn topics such as abortion, religion, etc.


It’s a real bad look when you attempt to use those topics to get a passionate response from me. It also demonstrates your complete inability to grasp why the left alienated so much of the country in 16. A little self reflection is desperately needed for you and @Cake4Breakfast.

You think you’re doing the left favors, you’re the cancer in the party driving off normal people.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

The left isn't a party you dumbass.
 
I find it sad that people are so fine with identity politics that they laugh that these guys got it a bit wrong.
 
So he actually opposes him because of tweets and because doesn't like his news sources?

I'm assuming Booker does oppose him for his politics, but how is this different from the entire left wing claiming anyone who opposed Obama was clearly for racist, or Hillary blaming sexism for not winning?

If you wonder why Breitbart bothers with such obviously dishonest propaganda, here's your answer. A lot of the low-brow right truly does hold that cartoonish view of their opposition.
 
Wait, seriously? I always forget those conversations get deleted so not everyone sees them.

Which one, though? I've been on here like 13 months, and I remember Rational Poster using the "But 15 year olds qualify as hebephilia!!" argument, and like yesterday, with Bloodworth talking about the high class trim he gets at high schools.
 
Where is the quote of me wanting to fight you?

Idk, there are probably a lot of them out there. You sure did get very angry last month when I pointed out that no one on the left goes after you because we don't take you seriously.
 
Back
Top