I checked a dictionary to confirm my understanding of the word before I responded. I simply disagree that this subject is "of an esoteric nature" to me. To be honest, I think you may be confusing me with other posters in this thread. I responded to a post in which you quoted another poster. You were responding to someone who objected to you seeming to revel in the idea of conor's downfall. I took up where they left off. I never even referenced the diaz/conor fight, who won it, how I scored it or any of that. Yes, it was close. More importantly, it's in the past.
All that said, there's an overtone of hostility in your post. Imo, you're a bit of an asshole.
thanks for teaching me about 10-22 though.
edit: though, it's ironic you object to teaching people on here, yet chose the screen name Franklin U <45>