- Joined
- Nov 15, 2015
- Messages
- 11,917
- Reaction score
- 4,606
In terms of boxing commentating a lot of people say 'he is the best we have had for years!'
Am i the only one who thinks he is a stumbling, mumbling mess? He talks way too fast, doesnt offer much real technical analysis and is basically a time filller. Consistent rambling doesnt equal a good commentator. Dan Hardy could provide better boxing commentating than paulie. The myth he is a great commentator is exactly that- a myth.
I feel like someone said he is good then everyone felt obliged to agree for some strange reason. Tell me im not the only person who thinks this
Am i the only one who thinks he is a stumbling, mumbling mess? He talks way too fast, doesnt offer much real technical analysis and is basically a time filller. Consistent rambling doesnt equal a good commentator. Dan Hardy could provide better boxing commentating than paulie. The myth he is a great commentator is exactly that- a myth.
I feel like someone said he is good then everyone felt obliged to agree for some strange reason. Tell me im not the only person who thinks this