Best striking defense in MMA history?

Good one, but I feel like if he comes back, he will be far less effective than in the past because after years of studying his patterns, opponents will have figured him out to a degree. Not saying that he isn't still elite, but it will be like Machida after Shogun showed the world how to beat him. Garbrandt showed the blueprint to beating Cruz and I'm not sure Dom can make the necessary adjustments to his style at this stage of his career.

Yeah, but the thread is about history, not hypothetical future.
 
McGregor doesn't have good striking defense at all. He absorbed a record number of blows to the head in his second fight against Nate IIRC.
Also, his Significant Strike Defense according to Fighmetric equals to 57%: http://www.fightmetric.com/fighter-details/f4c49976c75c5ab2
For reference, in the Fightmetric top 10 list of Significant Strike Defense, the #10 guy (Renato Moicano) has 69,9%. Other top FWs: Holloway (65%) and Aldo (67%)

Edgar up there with 70%
 
People always make Lawler out to be this aggressive banger, but his in pocket defense is among the best in the UFC. I'd argue he's one of the most defensively minded fighters today.
Good answer
 
Striking defense is barely a thing in MMA.
no, it definitely is.
the guard is just not the way to do it. the best way is to not be there in the first place so the most athletic fighters with the best reflexes just dodge punches like the matrix
 
When Machida took the UFC LHW belt he was statistically the least hit fighter in UFC history.
 
i like defensively sound fighters(even though they might seem boring)
hence GSP, Machida, Thompson, Green, Dom are my favourite fighters
Rampage has great head movement in the pocket
 
MMA fans and commentators often seem to regard striking offense as the only aspect when discussing great strikers, and completely forget about the defensive aspect, which is oftentimes more important, especially in the heavier weight classes where great defense can cause the opponent to gas out without throwing a single punch. Alistair Overeem for example is a guy that is talked about as one of the best MMA strikers ever, when in fact his defense is poor, which is why he has been knocked out more times than can be counted on two hands.

Some names I can think of who have great striking defense (I don't think striking stats are an accurate reflection of effective striking btw):

Not in any particular order:
- Conor McGregor
McGregor has some of the most effective distance management and control in MMA history, if not the very best. This allows him to be incredibly difficult to hit, especially when fresh. However, his striking defense when he gasses suffers a lot, as evidenced by both Diaz fights. He, much like Jon Jones, is phenomenal at utilising his length advantage in fights and also uses this very well in his striking offense.
- Demetrious Johnson
One of the most well-rounded fighters in MMA history, DJ has unmatched speed and movement which allows him to avoid most of his opponent's significant strikes and has been rocked only a handful of times in his career.
- Anthony Johnson
One of the few fighters in MMA history who hasn't been rocked visibly in his entire career. I've rewatched the Vitor fight a few times and I don't think he was rocked, but rather shot a few takedowns because Vitor charged him like a madman and then Rumble quit on the ground as usual. Under Henri Hooft during his LHW run, he had excellent head movement, never dropped his hands, and always tucked his chin; three things that he wasn't all that good at when he fought at 170/185.
- Jon Jones
Jones relies on his length a lot to defend strikes, which is why his usually impenetrable defense was cracked a lot by Gus. Still, Jones is great at using jabs, side kicks, and oblique kicks to keep opponents off him, and even though he has showed an iron chin on the few occasions he has been hit by clean, hard shots, he does not need to rely on his chin very often because his footwork is so great and is better than anyone in MMA history at utilising his physical tools.
- Anderson Silva
His fundamentals weren't textbook, but in his prime his reflexes and head movement were so great that he didn't need to keep his hands up at all to be an effective defensive fighter.
- Cody Garbandt
Yes, he got KOd by TJ, but I think TJ won because he has a better chin than Cody and because his striking offense is more varied and effective. TJ is a better kicker, and is better at cutting angles, feints, and effective in both stances. Despite this, his head movement isn't as good as Cody's and his feet aren't as quick, which means that he can't slide away from punches as quickly as Garbrandt.

LMAO! WTF is this? Just another Conor nut-rider trying to sneak in more Conor lies haha.

Conor doesn't have great striking defence at all. Yet not only are you putting his name in there amongst the best, you also suggest he is THE best HAHAHA. You are ridiculous.
Conor gets hit a ton, but he often outweighs his opponents and hits harder or has longer reach, so he tends to win the exchanges. His defence is pretty average though.

Anyway, Cruz is right up there. Also, I'd say the best striking defence I'd have to say Anderson Silva. He got caught by due to being extremely overconfident and toying with his opponent in Weidman, but aside from that, the guy moved like he was in the matrix. He defence and counters were out of this world. Can't think of anyone that did it better.
 
Back
Top