Crime Bank investigator raised concerns about money from China that ultimately funded $40,000 payment to Joe Biden

Just curious if you realize that Hunter joined Burisma in 2014? Also curious if you have a clue how much money we gave Burusma indirectly to help Ukraine become energy secure?

But you're right, unless Hunter or Jim sing then there is no "proof"; at least not enough to sustain impeachment.
Do you realize that there was an analysis done of Hunter's hard drive that shows exactly how much money he was taking in?

It's not particularly a lot. His company took in $11 million over 5-6 years, and he burned through it fast. Most of the deals he was working on, including the "10% for the big guy" everyone assumes was Joe, fell through. They never even happened.

More than half, almost $6 million, came from 2 business deals with Chinese businesses, not Ukraine.

It's not clear what Hunter did to receive the money, perhaps he was doing something shady, but there is absolutely nothing, no matter how hard people try to will it into existence, that points to Joe Biden being involved in anything illicit.
 
I didn't say they were being investigated "the same," nor should they be investigated the same. I said the Hunter Biden accusations are being investigated. You made it seem like nobody was looking into it with your previous post. People are investigating it and they're finding shit: https://oversight.house.gov/landing/biden-family-investigation/

The reason Trump/Russia got elevated to the level of an FBI investigation and special counsel investigation, is simply because there was more substance behind it.

A hostile foreign power interfered with our elections - a fact so uncontroversial even Trump himself, at times, has acquiesced to it - and a sitting POTUS appeared to be cooperating with them. Trump's own personal lawyer was sentenced to prison for lying about their intentions to build a Trump Tower Moscow, which could only proceed with Putin's OK, while Trump was running for POTUS. A fact Trump also lied about, among others.

What do you want a special counsel to do about Joe Biden? Write a report, Jack Nicholson from the Shining style, that just says "10% for the big guy!" over and over again? With Hunter's cock for images? Maybe throw some of Ashley Biden's diary in there, so we can spice things up with stories of her getting potty trained?


Da fuk??? You had rumors of a pee tape and a fake story about secret communications through a bank. You also had an FBI informant trying to set-up some hapless foreign policy advisor.

Versus:
The VP taking meetings with execs of a company that both US and the UK had on a corruption watch list. And Joe made his "fire the prosecutor" threat just a month or so after Hunter was hired. Oh, and millions of dollars getting paid to the Bidens - including his teenaged granddaughter. And a laptop with all the details.

You're right, hardly any evidence to concern the fbi.....
 
So, the most powerful people in the world forced Trump to hold on to classified documents, despite repeated requests and subpoenas to return them, and made Trump's own lawyers lie that Trump gave them all back, and forced Trump to flood his own property to hide evidence, and forced Trump to tell his lackeys to lie? Then forced Trump's own appointee for the head of the FBI to get a search warrant to raid Trump's property to finally get them returned?

Damn! Trump is just a babe in the woods! Beset on all sides by evil forces! Witch hunt! Hoax!

How'd they accomplish this feat of mind-control? Fluoride in the water? 5G? Bill Gates' microchips?

He's guilty as sin on that; GA and DC charges to.
 
Republican House leaders should have Hunter publicly testify and get to the bottom of it. Maybe they're too busy still staring at his dick pics?

Either that or looking for the infamous pee tape.
 
Also, let's be clear here: If you want transparency...make thing transparent. Tadaa. Republicans' mouths are writing checks their asses can't cash.

Hunter Biden called their bluff and wrote that publicly testifying “would prevent selective leaks, manipulated transcripts, doctored exhibits, or one-sided press statements.” Comer says "that won't stand with house Republicans."

Why not? It's because the Republicans have no confidence in their own investigation.

Years and years now of soiling their knickers about some vast Biden crime family conspiracy, and the Oversight Republicans reject Hunter's offer to appear in broad daylight before the world and answer questions?!

It's humiliating for the Republicans. Fortunately for them, their base is an undignified collection of deplorables. They want to drag this case out, for propaganda purposes, at the very least until the 2024 elections, and they'll be successful.

Wow, I wasn't aware that people were allowed to negotiate subpoenas and set their own rules to comply.
 
I didn't say they were being investigated "the same," nor should they be investigated the same. I said the Hunter Biden accusations are being investigated. You made it seem like nobody was looking into it with your previous post. People are investigating it and they're finding shit: https://oversight.house.gov/landing/biden-family-investigation/

The reason Trump/Russia got elevated to the level of an FBI investigation and special counsel investigation, is simply because there was more substance behind it.

A hostile foreign power interfered with our elections - a fact so uncontroversial even Trump himself, at times, has acquiesced to it - and a sitting POTUS appeared to be cooperating with them. Trump's own personal lawyer was sentenced to prison for lying about their intentions to build a Trump Tower Moscow, which could only proceed with Putin's OK, while Trump was running for POTUS. A fact Trump also lied about, among others.

What do you want a special counsel to do about Joe Biden? Write a report, Jack Nicholson from the Shining style, that just says "10% for the big guy!" over and over again? With Hunter's cock for images? Maybe throw some of Ashley Biden's diary in there, so we can spice things up with stories of her getting potty trained?

Maybe see if he had that councilor fired to protect his sons board seat? Find out why certain Russian oligarch were exempt from US sanctions. See if Joe was getting 10% under the table. Definitely find out if Joe sent secret service to recover Hunter's illegal gun. Just a few off the top of my head.

Potty trained? That's what you call a grown ass man showering with his post-pubescent daughter? No wonder they say liberalism is a disease.
 
Da fuk??? You had rumors of a pee tape and a fake story about secret communications through a bank. You also had an FBI informant trying to set-up some hapless foreign policy advisor.
No, no, no and no. The FBI investigation into Russian interference and the Trump campaigns connections to it began because of George Papadopolous opening his mouth that the Russians had material about Hillary Clinton they were going to release as part of their assistance of the Trump campaign.

The conclusion of the investigations were that the Russians interfered in a sweeping and systematic nature to assist Trump, and among other items of interest, Donald Trump himself committed 11 acts of obstruction of justice with the investigation, and he was only saved from indictments by being the sitting president.

Real. Evidence.

Versus:
The VP taking meetings with execs of a company that both US and the UK had on a corruption watch list. And Joe made his "fire the prosecutor" threat just a month or so after Hunter was hired. Oh, and millions of dollars getting paid to the Bidens - including his teenaged granddaughter. And a laptop with all the details.

You're right, hardly any evidence to concern the fbi.....
There is no evidence that Joe Biden was involved in anything illicit. Absolutely none. Zilch.

At times, the geriatric leaders of the Republican Party, have said the quiet part out loud. Chuck Grassley, on Fox News: “we aren’t interested in whether or not the accusations against President Biden are accurate or not.”

<WellThere>
 
Quite obvious based on what evidence?

-At least 13 meetings at the WH with Hunters business partners that Joe said he's never met.
-Having the prosecutor investigating Burisma fired a month after Hunter joined the board.
-10% for the big guy
-foreign companies paying Joe's teenage grandchildren.
-common f'n sense
 
Maybe see if he had that councilor fired to protect his sons board seat? Find out why certain Russian oligarch were exempt from US sanctions. See if Joe was getting 10% under the table. Definitely find out if Joe sent secret service to recover Hunter's illegal gun. Just a few off the top of my head.

Potty trained? That's what you call a grown ass man showering with his post-pubescent daughter? No wonder they say liberalism is a disease.
The person who popularized the term liberalism is a disease was Michael Savage, who used to write love letters to Alan Ginsberg, a poet notable for being a member of NAMBLA. It was an unrequited love, and Michael Savage changed his name from Michael Weiner to MIchael Savage, and became a far right-wing figure for revenge. I really don't think he's one to talk.
 
Do you realize that there was an analysis done of Hunter's hard drive that shows exactly how much money he was taking in?

It's not particularly a lot. His company took in $11 million over 5-6 years, and he burned through it fast. Most of the deals he was working on, including the "10% for the big guy" everyone assumes was Joe, fell through. They never even happened.

More than half, almost $6 million, came from 2 business deals with Chinese businesses, not Ukraine.

It's not clear what Hunter did to receive the money, perhaps he was doing something shady, but there is absolutely nothing, no matter how hard people try to will it into existence, that points to Joe Biden being involved in anything illicit.

Burisma was listed as a corrupt business in 2014. In May Hunter joins the board and suddenly in June Ukraine needs to fire 1 prosecutor and Burusma execs are having meetings with Joe at the WH.

Nothing shady at all. Lol. We're about to elect a POTUS between 2 of the shaddiest people ever to run.
 
It's funny because anyone that knows anything about the law understands that there is endless discretion when it comes to bringing charges or not.
Convening a grand jury or not.
They know that anybody can sue anyone for anything in civil court and the burden of proof is much lower than in criminal court.

Anyone that knows anything about politics understands that an impeachment is a political process...not a legal one. Anyone can be impeached assuming the numbers are there.

They are brought to influence low information voters...and they are brought so highly partisan hacks can point and say " look at all those cases and impeachments...of course your guy is guilty. Look at my guy... he's never been prosecuted"!!!


It's so obvious but you still have willfully ignorant clowns like Hola fall for it. I'm just not sure if he's in on the joke or not. Like does he realize he's a useful idiot? Or his he just happy these witch hunts are carried out so he has ammunition for the forums?
 
Burisma was listed as a corrupt business in 2014. In May Hunter joins the board and suddenly in June Ukraine needs to fire 1 prosecutor and Burusma execs are having meetings with Joe at the WH.

Nothing shady at all. Lol. We're about to elect a POTUS between 2 of the shaddiest people ever to run.
There's just no way you've been seriously following this story and are still pushing this bs. You just read/hear blips from right-wing bullshit, then pass it on like a game of Telephone. Or you're deliberately lying. Which is it?

Shokin was not prosecuting Burisma. He wasn't even investigating Burisma at the time. The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine has verified this, as have Shokin's own assistants.

Both European and American diplomats were pushing for Ukraine to clean up their corruption. And Shokin was actually the corrupt one.

Joe Biden did threaten to withhold $1 billion in aid, to get him ousted. This was along with American and European allies, who were in agreement. This was not Joe BIden acting independently. The International Monetary Fund threatened to withhold $40 billion for similar reasons. Are they in cahoots with Hunter Biden?!

The senate Republicans found no evidence Joe Biden pressured to fire Shokin to protect his son.

Joe Biden was only carrying out official U.S. policy, which was backed by our allies.

In conclusion, no. Nothing is going to happen to Joe Biden, while the Orange Rapist has been found to have committed fraud. These are the facts. Facts don't care about your feelings. Fuck your feelings.
 
Just curious if you realize that Hunter joined Burisma in 2014? Also curious if you have a clue how much money we gave Burusma indirectly to help Ukraine become energy secure?

But you're right, unless Hunter or Jim sing then there is no "proof"; at least not enough to sustain impeachment.

Is that something Comer and his lackeys are looking into? No? But you're right, there's no proof. Like the rest of the accusations this committee has made.
 
It's funny because anyone that knows anything about the law understands that there is endless discretion when it comes to bringing charges or not.
Convening a grand jury or not.
Yeah, like, is somebody guilty of a crime? Or are these baseless accusations we're just making for political theater?
They know that anybody can sue anyone for anything in civil court and the burden of proof is much lower than in criminal court.
If it's so easy, how come all of Trump's lawsuit's fail, and he gets fined for bringing frivolous lawsuits?
Anyone that knows anything about politics understands that an impeachment is a political process...not a legal one. Anyone can be impeached assuming the numbers are there.

They are brought to influence low information voters...and they are brought so highly partisan hacks can point and say " look at all those cases and impeachments...of course your guy is guilty. Look at my guy... he's never been prosecuted"!!!
Except, even Mitch McConnel, the Republican leader of the senate, got up and gave a speech saying Trump was clearly guilty, even though Mitch was going to vote to acquit. Is Mitch McConnell a libtard now? A RINO? Liz Cheney, who voted with Trump 93% of the time?
It's so obvious but you still have willfully ignorant clowns like Hola fall for it. I'm just not sure if he's in on the joke or not. Like does he realize he's a useful idiot? Or his he just happy these witch hunts are carried out so he has ammunition for the forums?
91 felony charges. $250 million civil lawsuit. Already found liable for multiple fraudulent and scumbag activities: You have to be an ignorant clown to fall for this!

Nothing: Can't you see his overwhelming guilt!!!!???? Look at all the evidence!!!

Haha...It's opposite day!

Hey, speaking of clowns...what happened with your super-intelligent, fail-proof, day-trading formula that was going to make your rich? Haven't seen you in the stonks thread lately?
 
-At least 13 meetings at the WH with Hunters business partners that Joe said he's never met.
-Having the prosecutor investigating Burisma fired a month after Hunter joined the board.
-10% for the big guy
-foreign companies paying Joe's teenage grandchildren.
-common f'n sense

I mean, this is the perfect illustration of this "investigation" in a nutshell.

- Ok? What was the illegality here? Biden never said he didn't meet Hunter's business partners.
- This has been completely debunked over and over. He was the fucking VP he's not making any policy.
- This is not evidence.
- Politicians kids making money off their family name?!? It's scummy as hell, but not illegal or evidence of anything impeachable.

If common f'n sense was in play here, this "investigation" would have been closed after the last "bombshell" they presented with Archer ended up in Comer and the rest of the committee being completely embarrassed by their own "star witness" completely destroying their whole theory up to that point.
 
If common f'n sense was in play here, this "investigation" would have been closed after the last "bombshell" they presented with Archer ended up in Comer and the rest of the committee being completely embarrassed by their own "star witness" completely destroying their whole theory up to that point.
Their star witness literally claimed the opposite of what Republicans claimed (and @PainIsLIfe is still running with). It was hilarious how Comer tried to fundraise off it:

"Star witness Devon Archer delivered BOMBSHELL testimony in front of the house oversight committee...Biden's DOJ tried to throw him in jail before he could testify...this is the smoking gun evidence we needed to prove that Joe Biden was the head of the Biden Bribery Scheme."

Then they said they needed financial support because of a "vicious character assassination campaign" against Comer.

<Grimes01>

 
Their star witness literally claimed the opposite of what Republicans claimed (and @PainIsLIfe is still running with). It was hilarious how Comer tried to fundraise off it:

"Star witness Devon Archer delivered BOMBSHELL testimony in front of the house oversight committee...Biden's DOJ tried to throw him in jail before he could testify...this is the smoking gun evidence we needed to prove that Joe Biden was the head of the Biden Bribery Scheme."

Then they said they needed financial support because of a "vicious character assassination campaign" against Comer.

<Grimes01>


And this is exactly why they don't want public testimony from Hunter Biden, because they'd lose the chance to spin their failure.
 
Back
Top