Actors used in 'terrorist attack' in Iraq

[Chinballs]

People who still doubt that these kind of things are going on (and has been for a long time) are in for a rude awakening.

 

[mcveteran81]

No airfield was destroyed. It was back up and running within days. He sources everything he puts on his shows. That source might have been wrong, but he sourced it.

Corbett also rarely ever speaks in certainty, and always encourages his listeners to do their own research.

Of course this is just one topic. Issue after issue that you would mock Corbett or myself for, he sources and covers. If we actually engaged on issue after issue that he has covered, you would quickly be exposed as a useful idiot, or be woke.

Your plausible deniability, isn't plausible as a mosaic.

Doubt @Madmick will even reply to you.

His CNN tv life can't be taken away from him.

 

[Madmick]

No airfield was destroyed. It was back up and running within days. He sources everything he puts on his shows. That source might have been wrong, but he sourced it.

Corbett also rarely ever speaks in certainty, and always encourages his listeners to do their own research.

Of course this is just one topic. Issue after issue that you would mock Corbett or myself for, he sources and covers. If we actually engaged on issue after issue that he has covered, you would quickly be exposed as a useful idiot, or be woke.

Your plausible deniability, isn't plausible as a mosaic.

Yes, airfields were hit. I love how suddenly this becomes a semantic argument when that clearly wasn't the spirit of his language in the article I quoted. This was the paragraph he wrote:
"The Trump Train, still convinced by candidate Trump (“dropping bombs on Assad” and “look what happened after Gaddafi“) concluded that this was 7th dimensional backgammon to make China afraid of the US’ willingness to spend $100 million in a fearsome show of failing to destroy a single airfield."

That military strike, a volley of 59 Tomahawk land attack missiles of which 23 actually made it to their target, failed to take out a single runway or even keep the airbase from operating for even 24 hours, but was a complete success for ExxonMobil, Raytheon and Donald Trump."

I love how he cites RT-- RussiaToday!-- for his claim that only 23 Tomahawks delivered their payload on target. Okay, let's waste time studying widely accepted denotations:

Dictionary
air·field
ˈerˌfēld/
noun
noun: airfield; plural noun: airfields

1. an area of land set aside for the takeoff, landing, and maintenance of aircraft.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/airfield

Definition of airfield

• an area of land from which aircraft operate: such as
  • a : airport
  • b : air base

From the Brits:

airfieldnoun [ C ]
uk /ˈeə.fiːld/ us /ˈer.fiːld/ UK old-fashioned aerodrome

a level area where aircraft can take off and land, with fewer buildings and services than an airport and used by fewer passengers

Each and every one of these definitions of this word extends to include buildings (ex. "fewer than"), planes, and even ferry runway that airplanes would use, for example, to access the main runway aka landing strip.
Syria missile attack: Satellite photos show major damage to airfields
DoD releases satellite images of Syrian airfield hit by US
In any of the released satellite photos you see this destruction where buildings, plane depots, and ferry runway were hit. As Trump pointed out the main runways were not targeted. Why would we waste such expensive missiles on flat ground & concrete? How does that not make sense to you?

The human rights groups mentioned in those articles (including the Syrian Human Rights Observatory) themselves expounded on that by saying, for example, that Al-Shayrat was "almost completely destroyed". McMaster I believe estimated that we destroyed 20% of Assad's remaining Air Force.

There is a Wiki for this, btw:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Shayrat_missile_strike

An independent bomb damage assessment conducted by ImageSat International counted hits on 44 targets, with some targets being hit my more than one missile; these figures were determined using satellite images of the airbase 10 hours after the strike.[37]

The Russians say 23 hits, the Americans say 58 hits, and the independent investigations point to 44 confirmed hits. The Americans win the grayscale battle of honesty.

Again, at some point, you must try to learn.

 

[DoomPatrol]

In B4 you are called a Muslim apologist, anti Semitic, fake news poster, and pleas from shit posters to have you stop posting.

Also shame on you for not posting an anti Trump, CNN and general political rage porn thread. Cause identity politics is life.

You're so right.

That must mean all the car bombings are faked and nothing is going on in the Middle East.

 

[VivaRevolution]

Yes, airfields were hit. I love how suddenly this becomes a semantic argument when that clearly wasn't the spirit of his language in the article I quoted. This was the paragraph he wrote:
"The Trump Train, still convinced by candidate Trump (“dropping bombs on Assad” and “look what happened after Gaddafi“) concluded that this was 7th dimensional backgammon to make China afraid of the US’ willingness to spend $100 million in a fearsome show of failing to destroy a single airfield."

That military strike, a volley of 59 Tomahawk land attack missiles of which 23 actually made it to their target, failed to take out a single runway or even keep the airbase from operating for even 24 hours, but was a complete success for ExxonMobil, Raytheon and Donald Trump."

I love how he cites RT-- RussiaToday!-- for his claim that only 23 Tomahawks delivered their payload on target. Okay, let's waste time studying widely accepted denotations:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/airfield

From the Brits:

Each and every one of these definitions of this word extends to include buildings (ex. "fewer than"), planes, and even ferry runway that airplanes would use, for example, to access the main runway aka landing strip.
Syria missile attack: Satellite photos show major damage to airfields
DoD releases satellite images of Syrian airfield hit by US
In any of the released satellite photos you see this destruction where buildings, plane depots, and ferry runway were hit. As Trump pointed out the main runways were not targeted. Why would we waste such expensive missiles on flat ground & concrete? How does that not make sense to you?

The human rights groups mentioned in those articles (including the Syrian Human Rights Observatory) themselves expounded on that by saying, for example, that Al-Shayrat was "almost completely destroyed". McMaster I believe estimated that we destroyed 20% of Assad's remaining Air Force.

There is a Wiki for this, btw:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Shayrat_missile_strike

The Russians say 23 hits, the Americans say 58 hits, and the independent investigations point to 44 confirmed hits. The Americans win the grayscale battle of honesty.

Again, at some point, you must try to learn.

Learn what? Your side of a argument, that you yourself describe as a semantics argument?

Learn that the weapons we used, were not suited to the task of destroying an airfield?

 

[IDL]

no idea who the target audience was

but the reason for false flag operations is always the same - influence public opinion (i.e. their views/beliefs)

Often times to provide cover for offensives.

So a false flag can be used to precipitate a 'justified retaliation' (which is really just an attack)