- Joined
- Oct 5, 2011
- Messages
- 13,211
- Reaction score
- 396
Not a surprise given that jcc's entire village voted for him.How the fuck is Horford an All Star? Same with Lillard. He literally begged his way on the team.
Not a surprise given that jcc's entire village voted for him.How the fuck is Horford an All Star? Same with Lillard. He literally begged his way on the team.
Per game, almost certainly, although Lillard is scoring significantly more. But CP3 missed like 20 games.C'mon. Even if you hate him he's had a better season than Lillard
Not a surprise given that jcc's entire village voted for him.
Per game, almost certainly, although Lillard is scoring significantly more. But CP3 missed like 20 games.
I don't disagree. And he's better than Lillard. I'd just argue that it's hard to call him a snub when he's missed almost half the season so far. Meanwhile Lillard is averaging 25+ on similar shooting and hasn't missed time while keeping the Trailblazers in playoff contention. So I can't be upset he got the spot over CP3.I understand he missed time but you can argue that the Rockets are 2nd best team in the league. 18-2 when CP3 and James start together. 2-1 vs GS
I don't disagree. And he's better than Lillard. I'd just argue that it's hard to call him a snub when he's missed almost half the season so far. Meanwhile Lillard is averaging 25+ on similar shooting and hasn't missed time while keeping the Trailblazers in playoff contention. So I can't be upset he got the spot over CP3.
I don't disagree. And he's better than Lillard. I'd just argue that it's hard to call him a snub when he's missed almost half the season so far. Meanwhile Lillard is averaging 25+ on similar shooting and hasn't missed time while keeping the Trailblazers in playoff contention. So I can't be upset he got the spot over CP3.
Per game, almost certainly, although Lillard is scoring significantly more. But CP3 missed like 20 games.
It's already been established that lizard is overrated af by everybody not in the know who only values chucking and ppg. He is basically the anti Lowry who only true scientists of the game like Zach Lowe, @RR and myself realize impacts the game on so many levels the mere idea of comparison is absurd
First off, I said I'd take Lowry over Lillard when that discussion came up a week or two ago, even though the stats (basic and 'advanced') pretty much point to a pick 'em. In fact, as I said then, my only hesitation was that you Crap fans shit on Lowry every time the team loses (and he's never performed well in the 'yoffs). Secondly, no one is comparing him to Lowry now. Thirdly, he's the best player on a playoff team in the West, so being an All-Star isn't out of the realm of reasonable.It's already been established that lizard is overrated af by everybody not in the know who only values chucking and ppg. He is basically the anti Lowry who only true scientists of the game like Zach Lowe, @RR and myself realize impacts the game on so many levels the mere idea of comparison is absurd
It's already been established that lizard is overrated af by everybody not in the know who only values chucking and ppg. He is basically the anti Lowry who only true scientists of the game like Zach Lowe, @RR and myself realize impacts the game on so many levels the mere idea of comparison is absurd
First off, I said I'd take Lowry over Lillard when that discussion came up a week or two ago, even though the stats (basic and 'advanced') pretty much point to a pick 'em. In fact, as I said then, my only hesitation was that you Crap fans shit on Lowry every time the team loses (and he's never performed well in the 'yoffs). Secondly, no one is comparing him to Lowry now. Thirdly, he's the best player on a playoff team in the West, so being an All-Star isn't out of the realm of reasonable.
Dillard is far >>> than Lowry and anyone worth their salt will tell you that.
Lowrys is a lifetime loser with 0 RINGS and Dillard is in this same boat essentially. An "anti-lowry" would be any player who has known anything other than losing for their entire career.
As much as I see the case for under selling Lillard... it's just not true.
The Blazers should suck... I mean there's seriously nothing on that team that qualifies as a "proven winner". And before Lillard showed up they did suck.
Ever since Lillard arrived they've been a playoff team, Aldridge left, didn't matter... they still make yoffs.
Look at that roster man... you have Lillard and McCollum and then... Aminu? Evan Turner? Nurkic?
Add a mix of cast offs and filler... Napier, Ed Davis, Harkless.
This is a fucking playoff team in the West? This is a team that's less than two games behind the Russ / PG13 / Adams, Thunder? (Yes I left Melo off, he sucks)
He's the best player on a perennial playoff team that has little in the way of help... if they didn't make yoffs I'd say "Ok, he's not an All Star."
But similar to Dipo out East... you carry a small market team with little help into playoff contention... you're getting an All Star nod.
Well, I'm not going to argue their attitudes as I don't pretend to know or pay a ton of attention to either guy. But as for shooting 3's, Lowry takes 7.7/gm and Lillard 8.1/gm. Lowry is a better 3pt shooter, but Lillard still has the higher FG% and FT%. Lillard is also younger than Lowry who is starting to show his age and has far worse injury history. Lillard gets to the rim more effectively boosting his FTA and they are about dead even in assists, even though Lillard is accused of being 'shoot first' and Lowry isn't.Lowry wins. He never cries either. Plays hurt which is why players respect him. That's why Toronto is the best team in the East.
Then you take Lillard who jacks up 3s from the parking lot and couldn't care less about winning. He'll spend the vast majority of his time talking himsrlf up. Lol at crying yourself into an All-Star spot
Well, I'm not going to argue their attitudes as I don't pretend to know or pay a ton of attention to either guy. But as for shooting 3's, Lowry takes 7.7/gm and Lillard 8.1/gm. Lowry is a better 3pt shooter, but Lillard still has the higher FG% and FT%. Lillard is also younger than Lowry who is starting to show his age and has far worse injury history. Lillard gets to the rim more effectively boosting his FTA and they are about dead even in assists, even though Lillard is accused of being 'shoot first' and Lowry isn't.
Going by numbers up to the age of 27, or through 6 NBA seasons, there is no question Lillard has been better.
Lowry's only argument is the work he has put in in his recent prime (the last 3 or 4 seasons), which were at ages and experience levels beyond what Lillard has gotten to yet.
I took Lowry in that discussion because I do see the defense and intangibles you guys love to laud him for. But Lillard still has his prime to look forward to and it's a close discussion between Lillard's early career and Lowry's prime.