Worse decision ever?!

HuskySamoan

Gold Belt
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
16,807
Reaction score
34,413
Zubaira clearly won that...did more damage, landed more, clearly won the first 2 rounds. I guess if you get cut you lose now? MMA is a clown show with the moronic emphasis of "damage". I thought we were supposed to improve judging criteria? Morons.
 
Live odds had Him -715. One tweet said he was up 20-18. Ufc judges as usual.
 
Live odds had Him -715. One tweet said he was up 20-18. Ufc judges as usual.

He landed at a 2 to 1 clip in rounds 1 and 2 and clearly was landing more significant shots, applying pressure and whatnot. Whatever this emphasis on damage is, if anyone's cut or swells I guess they lose rounds automatically? This is horrifying. They're ruining the sport, the criteria somehow got worse.
 
I thought he clearly won all 3 rounds, but not the worst decision ever. 30-27 Brener is an awful score though, there is no case for Zub losing round 2.

Round 1 he got bloodied up, so it fooled the judges. And round 3 he didn't really do anything outside of control time.
 
I thought he clearly won all 3 rounds, but not the worst decision ever. 30-27 Brener is an awful score though, there is no case for Zub losing round 2.

Round 1 he got bloodied up, so it fooled the judges. And round 3 he didn't really do anything outside of control time.

Bleeding "fooling judges" when Zubaira outlanded Brenner and even seemed to rattle him multiple times with punches and land the majority of significant strikes is really concerning. I also thought Zubaira won all 3 rounds. This one was really bad, one of the worst. -800 nearly with 2 minutes left was the betting line for Zubaira.
 
2-1 I think it was, either way a small cut on the ridge of the nose can't be considered the only criteria for winning the fight.
 
Zubaira clearly won that...did more damage, landed more, clearly won the first 2 rounds. I guess if you get cut you lose now? MMA is a clown show with the moronic emphasis of "damage". I thought we were supposed to improve judging criteria? Morons.
I would say Chris Weidman's failed terrible spinning heel kick against Luke Rockhold and getting subsequently mauled on the ground as a worse decision

AcidicMeekHogget-size_restricted.gif
 
2-1 I think it was, either way a small cut on the ridge of the nose can't be considered the only criteria for winning the fight.

He was bleeding, must have been practically dead. What fucking idiots get hired to be judges?
 
It must be very difficult to find people without a negative opinion of Tukhugov to judge his fights.

He was suspended 2 years for testing positive for ostarine, then he was suspended 1 year for throwing sucker punches while working as a cornerman. On top of that, he has pulled out of 6 fights and missed weight in others, even after going up to the next division.

So it's not surprising that 5 of his last 7 fights have been split decisions.
 
Back
Top