- Joined
- Jun 27, 2013
- Messages
- 19,934
- Reaction score
- 18,577
What is the technical reasoning behind a Majority Decision?

What is the technical reasoning behind a Majority Decision?
![]()
That means two judges saw it in way of one fighter and the third judge saw it as a draw
Majority 2-1 versus UD 3-0
Whereas a split is two judges to one fighter. One judge to the other.
Nailed it. Thank you.Majority Draw - 29-28, 29-29, 29-29
Majority Decision - 29-28, 29-28, 29-29
Split Draw - 29-28, 28-29, 29-29
Split decision - 29-28, 29-28, 28-29
Unanimous decision - 29-28, 29-28, 29-28
Unanimous draw - 29-29, 29-29, 29-29
but im pretty sure that fight wasnt a majority decision.
Yeah the graphic is wrong.Anderson/Maia wasn't a majority decision, though, deceptive gif...
![]()
jeez, conor is deep rooted in this poor guy's brainIts the correct answer when Conor fans say he dominated Nate in their 2nd fight.
What's the last time you've seen a majority decision, again?jeez, conor is deep rooted in this poor guy's brain
jeez, conor is deep rooted in this poor guy's brain
It's a decision that's made by the majority.
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/how-to-score-a-decision.4000321/What is the technical reasoning behind a Majority Decision?
![]()
Majority Draw - 29-28, 29-29, 29-29
Majority Decision - 29-28, 29-28, 29-29
Split Draw - 29-28, 28-29, 29-29
Split decision - 29-28, 29-28, 28-29
Unanimous decision - 29-28, 29-28, 29-28
Unanimous draw - 29-29, 29-29, 29-29
but im pretty sure that fight wasnt a majority decision.