What does Jack Slack look like?

[BangBang]

Came across this thread in mixed martial arts.com and since he seems to be a current hot topic on these forums thought I'd ask the same question here. Jack. - thank me later!

Is this him?

 

[BangBang]

 

[Cool RoboCop Gun]

Jack Slack loses a lot of credibility to me just because he is anonymous.

If you want your opinions to be taken seriously, you should stand by them.

 

[BangBang]

 

[BangBang]

Jack Slack loses a lot of credibility to me just because he is anonymous.

If you want your opinions to be taken seriously, you should stand by them.

Same goes for the Weasle! Keep on topic please.

 

[Ares Black]

 

[luckystarr]

Its pretty strange that he is anonymous in the world where people try hard to boost their popularity.

 

[Martialbeef]

 

[BangBang]

 

[GiTGuD]

I think Jack Slack is saying BS sometimes....reminds me of MMA body language "experts"



He thinks he knows fighters intentions.......but sometimes I feel some fighting sequences were not 100% intentional like Jack Slack makes it seem.


For Example, if a fighter were were jabbing and if for some reason his opponent decided to duck down, and the jabber got em with a nice uppercut.....Jack Slack will find meaning in that and say it was a perfect setup and create a storyline on how it was all "planned", when in reality, it was random occurrence of fight sequences

 

[Karelinator]

Its pretty strange that he is anonymous in the world where people try hard to boost their popularity.

Probably just doesn't like idea of being recognizable public figure, plenty of people are not cut out for that.


Then again, writing nerdish analyzes of D-level human cockfighting/karate matches wouldn't exactly make him widely recognizable.

 

[bref]

I'm assuming he looks like this:

 

[HunterAcosta]

Bout tree fiddy,

 

[BangBang]

Maybe his son? Too old for Slacky

I think Jack Slack is saying BS sometimes....reminds me of body language "experts"



He thinks he knows fighters intentions.......but sometimes I feel some fighting sequences were not 100% intentional like Jack Slack makes it seem.


For Example, if a fighter were were jabbing and if for some reason his opponent decided to duck down, and the jabber got em with a nice uppercut.....Jack Slack will find meaning in that and say it was a perfect setup and create a storyline on how it was all "planned", when in reality, it was random occurrence of fight sequences

I wrote a letter to the government the other day.. it said we were suckers


Forgot who sung that....fecking amazing song

 

[Martialbeef]

I think Jack Slack is saying BS sometimes....reminds me of body language "experts"



He thinks he knows fighters intentions.......but sometimes I feel some fighting sequences were not 100% intentional like Jack Slack makes it seem.


For Example, if a fighter were were jabbing and if for some reason his opponent decided to duck down, and the jabber got em with a nice uppercut.....Jack Slack will find meaning in that and say it was a perfect setup and create a storyline on how it was all "planned", when in reality, it was random occurrence of fight sequences

Bit like Luke Thomas, although he does know what he’s on about for the most part.

 

[Iron Nick]

He probably hides his appearance because his hairline and physique can't keep up with us sherdoggers!

Spoiler

 

[BRASIL WAND]

Jack Slack is some out of shape geek who’s read too many 1950’s boxing books and never grappled a day in his life. All he does is spam gifs and old boxing book references in his articles.

He cashes in on casuals and simps.


If you want GOOD fight analysis go to Matt Serra, Dom, Dan Hardy(when not making picks), Bisping, etc. Those guys are solid.

 

[BangBang]

I'm assuming he looks like this:

Not posh enough I don't think....

 

[SandaKicker]

I think Jack Slack is saying BS sometimes....reminds me of body language "experts"



He thinks he knows fighters intentions.......but sometimes I feel some fighting sequences were not 100% intentional like Jack Slack makes it seem.


For Example, if a fighter were were jabbing and if for some reason his opponent decided to duck down, and the jabber got em with a nice uppercut.....Jack Slack will find meaning in that and say it was a perfect setup and create a storyline on how it was all "planned", when in reality, it was random occurrence of fight sequences

Not too sure about Jack Slack as I’ve not seen that much of his stuff but I definitely get that vibe with Lawrence Kenshin.

Edit: Does anyone know what Lawrence Kenshin looks like?

 

[BangBang]

Jack Slack is some out of shape geek who’s read too many 1950’s boxing books and never grappled a day in his life. All he does is spam gifs and old boxing book references in his articles.

He cashes in on casuals and simps.


If you want GOOD fight analysis go to Matt Serra, Dom, Dan Hardy(when not making picks), Bisping, etc. Those guys are solid.

He seems so studied, if that's a word.

I mean he references shit and everything!