- Joined
- Jul 2, 2007
- Messages
- 28,570
- Reaction score
- 15,667
The fact the UFC had BW and flyweight champs who were age 34 until recently proves this as well. The lightest divisions are the least forgiving as you get older.People jump on the “[insert fighter] name is out of his prime after a loss”. Way to quickly, it’s outdated excuse from those PrideFC fan girls, that made it common place in today’s MMA landscape, When in reality Volkanovski clearly was still fighting at elite level in his losses to Makhachev and Topuria, he just loss to better fighters, lots of fighters of were discarded after a loss, Jose Aldo is a good example, he clearly still had it and was able to compete against elite comp in lower weight class, still was physically capable same as Volkanovski is at this current time. It’s just people are stuck with ways believing a fighter is shot after a few losses, instead accepting the better fighters won.
I always got flak for saying it (and probably will again), but there's no way Cro-Cop, Big Nog and Fedor should all get the "past prime" excuse at age 32-33 when that's not granted to non-Pride fighters.
It's not just Pride, either. I heard Gil Melendez was "too old" at age 31 when he came to the UFC from Strikeforce. But Islam was LW and then WW champ at age 34. Now they're saying the same for Patchy. It's more about personal bias and anti-UFC sentiment than logical thinking and consistency.