• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Media Verdict MMA gave Blachowics the first 3 rounds

the outrage because of that fight being scored a draw is seriously one of the most perplexing things i have seen in combat sports.

Jan has a pretty easy argument for winning the first 3. Ankalaev the last two with 5 maybe being a 10-8. Has an argument for the first.

Pretty easily can be scored a draw yet everyone was acting like it was some insane result
 
I thought the biggest issue was the co-main.
Dog shit judging was at least consistent. Hopefully ankalaev is hungrier his next time out, when he showed offense, it looked good to me. You can’t always be the counter striker or waiting for someone to initiate. He looked initiating and I hope he tweaks his style a little bit, because he has potential to be exciting. His boring style will put judges to sleep and they’re the ones judging the fight. Meanwhile Jan landed monster leg kicks that visibly hurt Ankalaev.
 
Jan obviously took 2 and 3, with Mago taking 4 and 5. 1 was close, though I think I was leaning toward Jan. I can also see 5 being a 10-8, though, so that'd be a draw.

What I can't fathom is the judge that gave 3 to Mago. He looked like he was on the verge of being finished and he wins the round?
 
I don't think Jan won. But there's an argument for it for sure. Blatant robbery it was not.
 
The only reason the decision is controversial at all is because Ank won the last two rounds so people think that means he won the fight. The issue with that is the first round was 50/50 and 2 and 3 were clearly Jan.
 
The only reason the decision is controversial at all is because Ank won the last two rounds so people think that means he won the fight. The issue with that is the first round was 50/50 and 2 and 3 were clearly Jan.

Yea probably just recency bias
 
Why are people calling it a robbery???


Because you agree with 1 out of the 2 outlets, out of 30 credentialed media scores, it somehow validates your view and not the other views?

28/30 is what people would use to call this a robbery. Not 2/30 to dissuade others of that opinion.

This is some low brow shit for a POTY prete...contender. Come with something better than 7% of media outlets supporting your view. I'm not even going to mention the other obvious bit which is the site you are citing actually gave Ankalaev the edge in the fight overall.

Why even bother with this? You trying to make sure you aren't POTY in '23 also?
 
People who try and claim Jan has an argument for the first round do not know how fights are scored, he lost that one period. Ank won 1, 4 and 5 clearly IMO, hell even 3 was arguable as striking was even but Jan did damage the legs visibly. Ankalev should have been given the nod end of story, but I will agree the decision was no where near as bad as the co main.
 
Back
Top