- Joined
- Nov 14, 2019
- Messages
- 23,672
- Reaction score
- 52,610
Dog shit judging was at least consistent. Hopefully ankalaev is hungrier his next time out, when he showed offense, it looked good to me. You can’t always be the counter striker or waiting for someone to initiate. He looked initiating and I hope he tweaks his style a little bit, because he has potential to be exciting. His boring style will put judges to sleep and they’re the ones judging the fight. Meanwhile Jan landed monster leg kicks that visibly hurt Ankalaev.I thought the biggest issue was the co-main.
Paddy Gordon was far far worse. Surely no one gave Paddy the win.http://www.mmadecisions.com/decision/13678/Magomed-Ankalaev-vs-Jan-Blachowicz
like 2 out 30 known media outlets gave it to Jan
The only reason the decision is controversial at all is because Ank won the last two rounds so people think that means he won the fight. The issue with that is the first round was 50/50 and 2 and 3 were clearly Jan.
You can probably add in the awful commentary too. The biggest reactions they gave for Ankalaev were missed or blocked shots, and then obviously Rogan completely bungled the post fight interviews.Yea probably just recency bias
Why are people calling it a robbery???