- Joined
- Apr 25, 2016
- Messages
- 29,643
- Reaction score
- 29,281
Keep in mind that your post has zero likes & mine 15. The OP also has less likes & my post is on the 2nd page. At the least, this indicates that your opinion is not generally agreed upon.How does this have likes lmao
I've been a UFC fan since the beginning, & this is an average PPV card with a compelling main & co-main with a couple of interesting fights & a couple of potential sleepers that could explode. Sure, it's not a barn burner imo, but it's certainly not dog shit if you take a closer look.
This is where your pov is coming from. Your hatred for O'Malley blinds you to the fact that this is one of the most interesting fights in the division that Merab's already cleared out. You're also being blinded from appreciating the other interesting tidbits throughout this card. I gave a breakdown of the fight below.O’Malley getting the TS is a complete disgrace, that alone is enough to be upset with this card, is it semi interesting? Sure, Merab vs anyone in the top ten is semi interesting, that’s an unbelievably low bar.
Sean did absolutely nothing to deserve a rematch, the fight was not close the first time
Did OMalley really get two rounds?
You have to appreciate damage as the highest of scoring criteria. Position scores zero. Who's pressing a fight, pushing the other against the fence, or who is on top or bottom on the mat is not a judging criteria.I'd have to rewatch it, but i remember thinking he got dominated for nearly every second of that fight.
I watched it 3 more times with scoring in mind, while discussing it on teh dog the day after.
I agree wit teh 3-2 judging... (which I also agreed too after teh fight)... but the R4 Willy won, was very close due to O'Malley making significant lacerations early. Willy was bleeding all over him while he rode & I'd agree, did make up for the lacerations with his barage of strikes, but it's not some washout though, like many seem to elude to... just because Merab was on top. Context matters... & Merab had a lot of catching up to do after being lacerated.
R1 - Willy Won, got some TD's that won him the round, but couldn't keep O'Malley down. this round wasn't much, but for sure Willy won.
R2 - Willy won by holding him down & doing very well & attacking, but not putting him in any real danger. Willy's best round.
R3 - O'Malley won. It stayed standing mostly, perhaps because Merab's own pace slowed him down a bit and didn't allow him to spam TD's.
R4 - Willy Won arguably - O'Malley winning the early exchanges, Merab got him down, which is a scoring criteria, but O'Malley busted him up with a Helbow which is way more significant. Merab came back with lots of shots, & though he didn't lacerate O'Malley in turn, his volume arguably makes this Merab's round. Lacerations are of the highest of judging criteria.
R5 - O'Malley won - Merab took some hard shots to the body that hurt him, I'd expect this will be where O'Malley aims for in a follow up fight.
3-2 - Merab, but that winning r4 round where merab got lacerated, is a huge scoring criteria against him. Had O'Malley gotten loose &/or not taken a few of those shots from the bottom, the outcome could've been switched, because teh Helbow that bloodied Merab in that round was the most significant of the fight.
Lets get real... this waz close! Merab won rounds with inconsequential striking after the TDs. O'Malley had teh R4 laceration, & teh R5 belly strikes which were teh 2 strongest opportunities for this fight to end... which is the highest of scoring criteria.
So I'd love to see this again.
Last edited: