Social Trump cracks down on homelessness with executive order enabling local governments

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@Silver
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
12,595
Reaction score
15,533
Order removes restrictions from municipalities and redirects funds toward rehabilitation and treatment

Dani Anguiano and Sam Levin

The federal government is seeking to crack down on homelessness in the US, with Donald Trump issuing an executive order to push local governments to remove unhoused people from the streets.

The order the US president signed on Thursday will seek the “reversal of federal or state judicial precedents and the termination of consent decrees” that restrict local governments’ ability to force people into treatment for mental health, and redirect funds to support rehabilitation and treatment. The order aims to “restore public order”, saying “endemic vagrancy, disorderly behavior, sudden confrontations, and violent attacks have made our cities unsafe”, according to the order.

The action comes as the homelessness crisis in the US has significantly worsened in recent years driven by a widespread shortage of affordable housing. Last year, a single-day count, which is a rough estimate, recorded more than 770,000 people experiencing homelessness across the country, the highest figure ever documented.
Cities and states have adopted an increasingly punitive approach to homelessness, seeking to push people out of parks and city streets, even when there is no shelter available. The supreme court ruled last year that cities can impose fines and even jail time for unhoused people for sleeping outside after local governments argued some protections for unhoused people prevented them from taking action to reduce homelessness.

Trump’s action seeks to move unhoused people to “long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment”, according to the order.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, told USA Today, which first reported on the executive order, that the president was “delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again” and end homelessness.

“By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need,” she said.
images

The National Homelessness Law Center condemned the order, which it said “deprives people of their basic rights” and would ultimately worsen the problem.

“Today’s executive orders, combined with Maga’s budget cuts for housing and healthcare, will increase the number of people forced to live in tents, in their cars, and on the streets. This order does nothing to lower the cost of housing or help people make ends meet,” said Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center.

The president’s order comes after last year’s US supreme court ruling, which was one of the most consequential legal decisions on homelessness in decades in the US.

That ruling held that it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” to criminalize camping when there is no shelter available. The case originated in Grants Pass, Oregon, a city that was defending its efforts to prosecute people for sleeping in public.
01.jpg

Unhoused people in the US have long faced crackdowns and sweeps, with policies and police practices that result in law enforcement harassment, tickets or jail time. But the ruling supercharged those kinds of aggressive responses, emboldening cities and states to punish encampment residents who have no other options for shelter.

In a report last month, the American Civil Liberties Union found that cities across the US have introduced more than 320 bills criminalizing unhoused people, the majority of which have passed. The crackdowns have taken place in Democratic- and Republican-run states alike.

Advocates for unhoused people’s rights have long argued that criminalization only exacerbates the housing crisis, shuffling people in and out of jail or from one neighborhood to the next, as they lose their belongings and connections to providers, fall further into debt and wind up in increasingly unsafe conditions.

During his campaign last year, Trump used dark rhetoric to talk about the humanitarian crisis, threatening to force people into “tent cities”, raising fears that some of the poorest, most vulnerable Americans could end up in remote locations in settings that resemble concentration camps.
images

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/24/trump-homelessness-executive-order
 
Where are they redirecting those funds from?

How are these long term institutions being funded?
 
Where are they redirecting those funds from?

How are these long term institutions being funded?
He’s cut down environmental programs and got rid of dozens of programs that will see an increase in infectious diseases and long term increased death tolls. In natural disasters due to cutting funds like global weather tracking and all around disaster relief response we already seen that effect in Texas where many innocent lives could have been saved .

He’s worried about the homeless though ? The truth is this is just another way he can use authoritarian acts and he’ll probably use ICE to round them up and who knows what they’ll actually do ?

Environment, country safety , civilian rights in general, will all see more weakening under Trump but we’ll be safe from the rising homeless zombie apocalypse coming at least .
 
Where are they redirecting those funds from?

How are these long term institutions being funded?
That's your first thought? I can't think off too many things I would choose to fund over helping America's homeless people get off the streets. If you shrug at $50 million in condoms being sent to Palestinians but don't support this, then you have your head screwed on wrong. Maybe the cost of housing them will offset the amount of money spent to constantly clean top after them in public streets. Or the loss in real estate value for people and businesses surrounded by homeless encampments? I'd like to find more info on the specifics of how this will be done, but America's homeless should always be a priority.
 
Order removes restrictions from municipalities and redirects funds toward rehabilitation and treatment

Dani Anguiano and Sam Levin

The federal government is seeking to crack down on homelessness in the US, with Donald Trump issuing an executive order to push local governments to remove unhoused people from the streets.

The order the US president signed on Thursday will seek the “reversal of federal or state judicial precedents and the termination of consent decrees” that restrict local governments’ ability to force people into treatment for mental health, and redirect funds to support rehabilitation and treatment. The order aims to “restore public order”, saying “endemic vagrancy, disorderly behavior, sudden confrontations, and violent attacks have made our cities unsafe”, according to the order.

The action comes as the homelessness crisis in the US has significantly worsened in recent years driven by a widespread shortage of affordable housing. Last year, a single-day count, which is a rough estimate, recorded more than 770,000 people experiencing homelessness across the country, the highest figure ever documented.
Cities and states have adopted an increasingly punitive approach to homelessness, seeking to push people out of parks and city streets, even when there is no shelter available. The supreme court ruled last year that cities can impose fines and even jail time for unhoused people for sleeping outside after local governments argued some protections for unhoused people prevented them from taking action to reduce homelessness.

Trump’s action seeks to move unhoused people to “long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment”, according to the order.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, told USA Today, which first reported on the executive order, that the president was “delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again” and end homelessness.

“By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need,” she said.
images

The National Homelessness Law Center condemned the order, which it said “deprives people of their basic rights” and would ultimately worsen the problem.

“Today’s executive orders, combined with Maga’s budget cuts for housing and healthcare, will increase the number of people forced to live in tents, in their cars, and on the streets. This order does nothing to lower the cost of housing or help people make ends meet,” said Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center.

The president’s order comes after last year’s US supreme court ruling, which was one of the most consequential legal decisions on homelessness in decades in the US.

That ruling held that it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” to criminalize camping when there is no shelter available. The case originated in Grants Pass, Oregon, a city that was defending its efforts to prosecute people for sleeping in public.
01.jpg

Unhoused people in the US have long faced crackdowns and sweeps, with policies and police practices that result in law enforcement harassment, tickets or jail time. But the ruling supercharged those kinds of aggressive responses, emboldening cities and states to punish encampment residents who have no other options for shelter.

In a report last month, the American Civil Liberties Union found that cities across the US have introduced more than 320 bills criminalizing unhoused people, the majority of which have passed. The crackdowns have taken place in Democratic- and Republican-run states alike.

Advocates for unhoused people’s rights have long argued that criminalization only exacerbates the housing crisis, shuffling people in and out of jail or from one neighborhood to the next, as they lose their belongings and connections to providers, fall further into debt and wind up in increasingly unsafe conditions.

During his campaign last year, Trump used dark rhetoric to talk about the humanitarian crisis, threatening to force people into “tent cities”, raising fears that some of the poorest, most vulnerable Americans could end up in remote locations in settings that resemble concentration camps.
images

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/24/trump-homelessness-executive-order
I don't get it, where are these treatment centers going to come from? That shit will be hella expensive.
 
While I do want the government to step up and start doing some shit about the homeless problems I highly doubt Trump or his goons have any real strategy to safely do so. That said, homeless people here in LA are a fucking menace. I'm fortunate enough to not be around them where I live but anytime you go around downtown or Hollywood its pretty fucked up. A lot of people here will try and say its people that are just "down on their luck" or some BS. That may be true for some people, but there are thousands, probably tens of thousands that need to be institutionalized for medical or legal reasons. MacArthur Park and Skid Row look like the fucking zombie apocalypse.


Send them all to Barstow imo
 
Giving fines to homeless people for camping outside when there is no shelter available is odd. It just causes more issues down the line. Those homeless people aren't going to show up to court or pay those fines. We back to hiding the homeless in prisons now?
 
Order removes restrictions from municipalities and redirects funds toward rehabilitation and treatment

Dani Anguiano and Sam Levin

The federal government is seeking to crack down on homelessness in the US, with Donald Trump issuing an executive order to push local governments to remove unhoused people from the streets.

The order the US president signed on Thursday will seek the “reversal of federal or state judicial precedents and the termination of consent decrees” that restrict local governments’ ability to force people into treatment for mental health, and redirect funds to support rehabilitation and treatment. The order aims to “restore public order”, saying “endemic vagrancy, disorderly behavior, sudden confrontations, and violent attacks have made our cities unsafe”, according to the order.

The action comes as the homelessness crisis in the US has significantly worsened in recent years driven by a widespread shortage of affordable housing. Last year, a single-day count, which is a rough estimate, recorded more than 770,000 people experiencing homelessness across the country, the highest figure ever documented.
Cities and states have adopted an increasingly punitive approach to homelessness, seeking to push people out of parks and city streets, even when there is no shelter available. The supreme court ruled last year that cities can impose fines and even jail time for unhoused people for sleeping outside after local governments argued some protections for unhoused people prevented them from taking action to reduce homelessness.

Trump’s action seeks to move unhoused people to “long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment”, according to the order.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, told USA Today, which first reported on the executive order, that the president was “delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again” and end homelessness.

“By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need,” she said.
images

The National Homelessness Law Center condemned the order, which it said “deprives people of their basic rights” and would ultimately worsen the problem.

“Today’s executive orders, combined with Maga’s budget cuts for housing and healthcare, will increase the number of people forced to live in tents, in their cars, and on the streets. This order does nothing to lower the cost of housing or help people make ends meet,” said Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center.

The president’s order comes after last year’s US supreme court ruling, which was one of the most consequential legal decisions on homelessness in decades in the US.

That ruling held that it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” to criminalize camping when there is no shelter available. The case originated in Grants Pass, Oregon, a city that was defending its efforts to prosecute people for sleeping in public.
01.jpg

Unhoused people in the US have long faced crackdowns and sweeps, with policies and police practices that result in law enforcement harassment, tickets or jail time. But the ruling supercharged those kinds of aggressive responses, emboldening cities and states to punish encampment residents who have no other options for shelter.

In a report last month, the American Civil Liberties Union found that cities across the US have introduced more than 320 bills criminalizing unhoused people, the majority of which have passed. The crackdowns have taken place in Democratic- and Republican-run states alike.

Advocates for unhoused people’s rights have long argued that criminalization only exacerbates the housing crisis, shuffling people in and out of jail or from one neighborhood to the next, as they lose their belongings and connections to providers, fall further into debt and wind up in increasingly unsafe conditions.

During his campaign last year, Trump used dark rhetoric to talk about the humanitarian crisis, threatening to force people into “tent cities”, raising fears that some of the poorest, most vulnerable Americans could end up in remote locations in settings that resemble concentration camps.
images

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/24/trump-homelessness-executive-order
I dont have time to read right now.

Scanning it said make it criminal.

So where does it place the homeless ? I cant imagine its to provide aid or housing?
 
It's a boondoggle, that's for sure. The tent cities are definitely out of control, but fines and jackboots kicking their shit down won't do much, and people don't want to pay for for their needs.

No easy answers here.
 
Giving fines to homeless people for camping outside when there is no shelter available is odd. It just causes more issues down the line. Those homeless people aren't going to show up to court or pay those fines. We back to hiding the homeless in prisons now?


Hopefully someday back to mental institutions. One of Reagan’s biggest mistakes. There isn’t the infrastructure for that though and moving them to rehab isn’t effective and is temporary. They aren’t suited to deal with most homeless people but rehabs have been the stand in for loony bins since 80’s budget cuts.

That’s not just to stow them away. This is where so many of these people need to be.

The reality has really dated that Phil Collins song

I was just thinking the other day how rare it has become to see the classic homeless person with a coherent sob story and redemption arch.

Where I live and work they’re all over the place and it’s 8 of 10 zombies. They don’t ask for money mostly because they can no longer form a sentence, but they’re spitters, they are usually bleeding all over themselves, and they’re confrontational for nothing. Must be the Fentanyl and meth, but whatever they are doing i dont see any coming back from.

They’re a nuisance and many are just flat out dangerous people. Eventually there will need to be a way to shelter them by recognizing you just can’t give them a place that won’t turn into another burning pile of garbage and dangerous diseased paraphernalia in a week.

California has spent billions trying to house them in modular homes, etc. and it’s as if they haven’t tried anything at all because there are no successes to point to…because these people can’t be helped

Anyway, I see this helping some rural communities with small tent cities in the hills and forests that will take up Trump on it but the vast majority of homeless will be unaffected since they mostly reside in urban areas that won’t join this. Though Sacramento has been quicker on breaking up tent cities. Credit where it’s due.
 
What a disgusting administration. Clear the streets for photo ops!
I don't know the answer to this problem, but didn't Newsome clear the San Francisco streets of the homeless and filth prior to Xi's visit. Afterwards, it went back to "normal."
 
Here's the order:

So we're going back to doing what we did decades ago. We're going to permanently institutionalize the crazy ones. Thank God.

We're going to redistribute funding for things like substance abuse programs and housing to the States and County/Municipal governments that have a much better idea of how to address their specific homeless issues than let the Fed make decisions from hundreds or thousands of miles away. Because HUD has spent shitload of money and it's achieved nothing to alleviate housing prices, or to mitigate homelessness (the last provision states they will bear the funding burden by this order, so I'm assuming that means all this money to smaller governments will come from their budget).

It's placing a condition on this that those smaller governments first prioritize prohibition of drug use (hopefully with a focus on repeat offenders), illegal encampments, and squatting. So if you want that federal money faucet to come your way...no more kid gloves. First clean out the homeless camps. There are more provisions focused on ensuring any sex offenders or p***philes, in particular, are incarcerated rather than merely treated or released, so we don't waste our resources on trying to "rehabilitate" people who never rehabilitate.

Beautiful. It's a thing of beauty. And I really don't understand why the libs are bitching. Still plenty of government spending, they always seem to like that, and a commitment to the mental health and "get them off the streets" ethos. I'm sure they want far more in the way of government subsidies to try to bring down housing costs, but they're not in power, so don't expect to get everything you want.
 
I think they threw them in the bay. They came back cleaner.
What can be done to help these people? The reasons for homelessness varies. It's not a good place to be and once you are there, it's very hard to escape.
 
Here's the order:

So we're going back to doing what we did decades ago. We're going to permanently institutionalize the crazy ones. Thank God.

And we're going to redistribute funding for things like substance abuse programs and housing to the States and County/Municipal governments that have a much better idea of how to address their specific homeless issues than have the Fed make decisions from hundreds or thousands of miles away. Because the HUD has spent shitload of money and it's done fuck all to alleviate housing prices, or mitigate homelessness (the last provision states the brunt of the funding burden here will be borne by them, so I'm assuming that means all this money to smaller governments will come from their budget).

It's placing a condition on this that those smaller governments first prioritize prohibition of drug use (hopefully with a focus on repeat offenders), illegal encampments, and squatting. So if you want that federal money faucet to come your way...no more kid gloves. And they are more provisions focused on ensuring any sex offenders or :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes, in particular, are incarcerated instead, so we don't waste our resources on trying to "rehabilitate" people who never rehabilitate.

Beautiful. It's a thing of beauty. And I really don't understand why the libs are bitching. Still plenty of government spending, they always seem to like that, and a commitment to the mental health and "get them off the streets" ethos. I'm sure they want in the way of government subsidies to try to bring down housing costs, but they're not in power, so don't expect to get everything you want.
It’s a good executive order
 
Back
Top