News The NSAC had a conference on 10-8 rounds today: Grasso 10-9 was the correct score

[Phisher]

 

[milliniar]

Did anyone really think 10-8 was the right score?
While I think Grasso won 3 Rds there were no 10-8s.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Did anyone really think 10-8 was the right score?
While I think Grasso won 3 Rds there were no 10-8s.

I was okay with it, don't get all the controversy after the fact.

 

[SuperNerd]

"This doesn’t make Mike less of a judge, he's just as good of a judge as he was."

 

[milliniar]

"This doesn’t make Mike less of a judge, he's just as good of a judge as he was."

Sounds like a Goldberg or Tito Quote

 

[IDGETKTFO]

So, are they going to overturn the draw to a NC? Still has the same end result with Grasso retaining her belt.

 

[TomTomNT]

this 10-8 crying conversation is distracting everyone from the fact that Grasso clearly won 3 rounds with ease, she should have never needed a 10-8 to win the fight

 

[xhaydenx]

this 10-8 crying conversation is distracting everyone from the fac that Grasso clearly won 3 rounds with ease, she should have never needed a 10-8 to win the fight

She didn't win any clear rounds apart from the one where she got the knockdown. She got controlled on the ground for way too long in all the others apart from the 5th to win them.

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

Damage, dominance, and duration. If you are able to give your opponent "The Three D's" then you are awarded a 10-8. That is, if they can survive..

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

Sounds like a Goldberg or Tito Quote

Funny, cuz there was a Tito arguing earlier today that there's no such thing as a bad score, and judges should never be questioned or reviewed

 

[Crash-override]

this 10-8 crying conversation is distracting everyone from the fac that Grasso clearly won 3 rounds with ease, she should have never needed a 10-8 to win the fight

She should have lost 3-2 or 4-1

 

[sanguinius]

It was bias, not incompetence. Shev got robbed hard.

 

[Phisher]

So, are they going to overturn the draw to a NC? Still has the same end result with Grasso retaining her belt.

They never overturn bad decisions and very rarely overturn mistakes.

But still, admitting the judge fucked up is a lot better than we usually get from them.

 

[Laheys'Liquorland]

Grasso 2,4,5.

 

[Lavitz]

Annnnddd NEW!!! Sike

lol Mike Bell one of the best judges in world.

 

[Poatan Power]

I was okay with it, don't get all the controversy after the fact.

Wow, can't disagree more lol. I'm pretty pro 10-8 when it comes to the "CONSIDER" criteria but it has to be damage related. Wrestling someone and not achieving damage shouldn't be a 10-8, imo. But the slides from this meeting and content is very promising imho. This kind of continuing education is paramount to successful professions.

 

[DestinedAussie]

I don't really get the point of this exercise? If you aren't going to detail why instead of anon poll, I don't get how this helps anything except gives Val more bs to spew and how it helps judges in the future make the correct decision.

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

Annnnddd NEW!!! Sike

lol Mike Bell one of the best judges in world.

Just like Herb is 'the best ref in the business'

 

[Axe720]

Did anyone really think 10-8 was the right score?
While I think Grasso won 3 Rds there were no 10-8s.

Yeah, one guy on here said Grasso landed 300 strikes or something and it was a clear 10-8. I wonder if he can catch this seminar on repeat.

 

[markg171]

10-9 is the correct score, but “telling” judges what the correct score is completely ruins the entire concept of judges.

The whole point of judges, in all situations, is that you’re entrusting them to render a decision. They can be right and/or wrong, but you picked them to decide things. Not yourself or democratically.

If you’re going to suddenly turn around and disregard judges then there’s no point in having them. Just decide fights on some other criteria.