- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 249
- Reaction score
- 411
60 fighters are projected to be cut from the UFC in the coming months. The firing of Yoel, and Dana's subsequent comments regarding other "name" fighters, indicates that many of these will be high profile guys.
This coincides with unprecedented signings off the Contender Series. It seems that the UFC's strategy is to flood the company with hungry young fighters working for the minimum while dumping what they see to be inflated veteran contracts. This could be a sound financial strategy.
Could it also backfire? A guy like Yoel still has a lot of cache in my eyes. If the UFC cuts many more Romero level guys all at once (the Cowboys and Aldos of the world for example) could this provide enough juice for competitors to finally gain widespread attention? Does a Bellator or ONE even have the capital to take advantage of a huge influx of name value fighters onto the market? Because these fighters will all be entering free agency at once, I could see many of them being lost in the shuffle unfortunately.
The team element of MMA should also be considered. Those 60 fighters will have close ties to innumerable other fighters and camps. Will that further damage fighter perception of UFC? Could we see a Masvidal type guy follow his best friend to another company when his contract is up?
Like Vince McMahon, Dana White believes in brand over performer. Ultimately, the UFC itself is his biggest star. Dana's goal, it seems, would be to churn out future stars from scratch at performance institutes across the globe. He would have a star for each geographical region, they would all be homegrown in the UFC, loyal, and replaceable.
If this is the strategy, is it viable? Will the upcoming cuts prove a good move or a blunder for the UFC?
This coincides with unprecedented signings off the Contender Series. It seems that the UFC's strategy is to flood the company with hungry young fighters working for the minimum while dumping what they see to be inflated veteran contracts. This could be a sound financial strategy.
Could it also backfire? A guy like Yoel still has a lot of cache in my eyes. If the UFC cuts many more Romero level guys all at once (the Cowboys and Aldos of the world for example) could this provide enough juice for competitors to finally gain widespread attention? Does a Bellator or ONE even have the capital to take advantage of a huge influx of name value fighters onto the market? Because these fighters will all be entering free agency at once, I could see many of them being lost in the shuffle unfortunately.
The team element of MMA should also be considered. Those 60 fighters will have close ties to innumerable other fighters and camps. Will that further damage fighter perception of UFC? Could we see a Masvidal type guy follow his best friend to another company when his contract is up?
Like Vince McMahon, Dana White believes in brand over performer. Ultimately, the UFC itself is his biggest star. Dana's goal, it seems, would be to churn out future stars from scratch at performance institutes across the globe. He would have a star for each geographical region, they would all be homegrown in the UFC, loyal, and replaceable.
If this is the strategy, is it viable? Will the upcoming cuts prove a good move or a blunder for the UFC?