Thats a K.O slam

It was. You're an idiot.

that was DEF a clash of heads.. anyone who doesn't see that is literally Retarded


His head smashed the mat first from.the slam.

As Cruz said how do we know that didnt K.O him the mat... A head bouncing into another head after bouncing offf the mat isn't a head clash ...

Bull shit...K.O slam
 
I don't think you can KOSlam someone if the side of the head hits the canvas first, it's clearly the clash of heads that did it, a couple of official took the time to analyze the sequence and decided accordingly.


The legal technique caused the heads to impact over momentum... it's incidental but its still a K.O...

Its like what if your opponent is running at you and u punch him and his head clashes with yours on the way down...is it not a K.O then? ... sometimes shit is uncontrollable but you gotta look at how they got there and it was from a real legal technique...heads are gunna connect on takedowns cuz ur grappling and throwing...

With this decision they've just effectively called into question many previous slam K.Os...stupid move
 
Are you completely disregarding the headclash?? didn't you see it? do you think the officials reviewing the film didn't consider all the eventualities?? They arrived to that conclusion after carefully rewatching the sequence and i happen to think it was the right one, and no the decision doesn't call into question any past or future clean Slam KOs.
 
Back
Top