International Sudan now one of the 'worst humanitarian nightmares in recent history'

By that you just mean people.

People don't care.

Western people are not remotely interested, or it would get more coverage.
Chicken and the egg conversation.

Does the public care about something because the media tells them to care about it?

Or

Does the media cover something because the public signals to the media they want to know more about a subject?
 
Why the Lego renditions in all your posting?
5.6 million people have been displaced both within and outside national borders.

By Emma Ogao

75cb45d8bd20c6a24c914802141f91f4.jpg

LONDON -- United Nations Humanitarian and Emergency Relief Chief Martin Griffiths has said half-a-year of war has plunged Sudan into “one of the worst humanitarian nightmares in recent history."

As battles continue between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary group, up to 9,000 people have been killed and over 5.6 million people have been displaced both within and outside national borders.

“For six months, civilians – particularly in Khartoum, Darfur and Kordofan – have known no respite from bloodshed and terror,” Griffiths said. “Horrific reports of rape and sexual violence continue to emerge, and clashes are increasingly taking place along ethnic lines, particularly in Darfur. This cannot go on.”

sudan-conflict-destruction-gty-jt-230914_1694704603756_hpMain_2.jpg

The U.S. State Department this week said it is “deeply concerned by credible reports” that the Rapid Support Forces have “intensified” shelling around Nyala, South Darfur and Karari Omdurman -- a move the State Department says has “deepened” the suffering of the Sudanese people.

Six months on, Sudan’s paramilitary RSF has advanced to Khartoum, seeking to consolidate their reach in the capital with exception of some SAF strongholds. The SAF is reported to have secured bases in Eastern Sudan “headquartered at port Sudan along the Red Sea coast,” according to the United States Institute for Peace.

Meanwhile, the U.S. has called on shelling of civilian neighborhoods to be immediately ceased, saying “There is no acceptable military solution to this conflict – 'victory' by either side would exact an intolerable toll on the Sudanese people and their nation.”
maxresdefault.jpg

Fighting erupted in Sudan on April 15, a culmination of weeks of tensions linked to a planned transition to civilian rule. General Abdel-Fattah Burhan, commander of the Sudanese Armed Forces and General Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo head of the Rapid Support Forces -- once allies who jointly orchestrated a military coup in 2021 -- are now engaged in a vicious power struggle.

But millions have since been caught in the middle as Sudan has now become the “largest internal displacement crisis in the world,” according to the U.N.

sudan-conflict-fighters-gty-jt-230914_1694704428369_hpMain.jpg

Fighters ride in a vehicle moving in a military convoy accompanying the governor of Sudan's Darfur State during a stopover in the eastern city of Gedaref while on the way to Port Sudan, on Aug. 30, 2023.
AFP via Getty Images


"The situation now is the worst-case scenario," Jon Temin, vice president of policy and programs at the Truman Center for National Policy in Washington, D.C.,
told ABC News in May. "The two generals seem pretty set on fighting it out and seeing who wins, and an incredible number of people are going to suffer along the way."

But as war rages on in the country, Sudan’s health system is struggling and has been pushed to its breaking point.

“Emergency rooms are congested, and many hospitals have closed completely. In the capital, Khartoum, MSF medical teams are witnessing one of the most intense urban conflicts currently taking place worldwide,” says the MSF.
“Large numbers of injured people are arriving at the hospitals with life threatening wounds, often leaving medical staff with no choice but to amputate.”

The MSF announced this week that it has had “no choice” but to suspend surgery in Khartoum’s Bashair Teaching Hospital as military authorities suspend the transport of surgical materials from Wad Madani to south Khartoum.

“Despite repeated engagements with the health authorities since, these critical supplies remain blocked and stocks in the hospital are now depleted,” said Michiel Hofman, MSF’s operations coordinator for Sudan.

In a joint statement, the Federal Ministry of Health and state ministries of health in Sudan, UNICEF and the World Health Organization (WHO) warn further disruptions on health services could cost over 10,000 young lives by the end of the year, saying “About 70% of hospitals in conflict-affected states are not functional. WHO has verified 58 attacks on health care to date, with 31 deaths and 38 injuries of health workers and patients.”

362-Modern-Army-RM-Action-Shot-1200__49046.1607108648.jpg

Elsewhere, the U.S. has called on warring parties to oblige by their commitments under the Jeddah Declaration of Principles to Protect Civilians, “including by allowing unhindered humanitarian access, protecting civilians and their humanitarian rights, and upholding international humanitarian law,” said Matthew Miller. “It is time for this conflict and the suffering of the Sudanese people to end.”

https://abcnews.go.com/Internationa...-nightmares-recent-history/story?id=104173197

 
And now you see how the world really sees black Africans. Can black lives really matter when the world turns a blind eye to the deaths and displacement of millions of Sudanese? I pray for them, but they have proven they need to be governed by external parties.
 
And now you see how the world really sees black Africans. Can black lives really matter when the world turns a blind eye to the deaths and displacement of millions of Sudanese? I pray for them, but they have proven they need to be governed by external parties.

Not all that new. If not for Hollywood, the majority of Americans (I'd assume westerners in general but I can't speak for other nations) wouldn't have much of a clue what happens in Africa. When I was a kid there were commercials about starving kids in Africa, there was the Live Aid concert to help...but outside that not much news. You had the Rwandan genocide in the early 90's where the UN peacekeepers basically were overrun and took off but most in the west probably knew little about it until they made the movie Hotel Rwanda. The situation in Somalia was bleak for a long time, but who here heard much about it until Black Hawk Down? And even then, the movie was about our troops and what they faced (which was bad, don't get me wrong) vs how the warlords had taken over, were grabbing all the humanitarian aid, etc. Then the movie Blood Diamond delved into at least a little bit how us westerners have essentially pillaged parts of Africa for our own gain while leaving them still beyond poor where conditions devolve into these hellish landscapes with warlords fighting it out. Tears of the Sun described a little bit the brutality of what goes on. Machine Gun Preacher delved pretty well into the world of child soldiers and how they are forced to commit the atrocities that left them orphans in the first place. Think a lot of westerners knew the brutality of Idi Amin prior to the movie The Last King of Scotland?

Maybe now the world has shrunk enough that people won't have any choice but to pay a bit more attention. But up until now, it's Hollywood that's been the ones mostly getting the info out there and only because people think they'll get some sort of entertainment value from it have they bothered to watch. But relying on an entertainment industry to deliver this type of information seems like a good way to get plenty wrong in the name of artistic license.
 
I'm damn tired of trying to stabilize the world. Let the chips fall where they may. Whether it's Africa, Palestine, Ukraine, etc .... We, the US, need to worry about America and only America. To hell with the rest of the world.
 
By that you just mean people.

People don't care.

Western people are not remotely interested, or it would get more coverage.
You give too much credit to "people".
They are programmed by the media to care about things that they, the people, are supposed to care about.
Pfft... "People".
 
Not all that new. If not for Hollywood, the majority of Americans (I'd assume westerners in general but I can't speak for other nations) wouldn't have much of a clue what happens in Africa. When I was a kid there were commercials about starving kids in Africa, there was the Live Aid concert to help...but outside that not much news. You had the Rwandan genocide in the early 90's where the UN peacekeepers basically were overrun and took off but most in the west probably knew little about it until they made the movie Hotel Rwanda. The situation in Somalia was bleak for a long time, but who here heard much about it until Black Hawk Down? And even then, the movie was about our troops and what they faced (which was bad, don't get me wrong) vs how the warlords had taken over, were grabbing all the humanitarian aid, etc. Then the movie Blood Diamond delved into at least a little bit how us westerners have essentially pillaged parts of Africa for our own gain while leaving them still beyond poor where conditions devolve into these hellish landscapes with warlords fighting it out. Tears of the Sun described a little bit the brutality of what goes on. Machine Gun Preacher delved pretty well into the world of child soldiers and how they are forced to commit the atrocities that left them orphans in the first place. Think a lot of westerners knew the brutality of Idi Amin prior to the movie The Last King of Scotland?

Maybe now the world has shrunk enough that people won't have any choice but to pay a bit more attention. But up until now, it's Hollywood that's been the ones mostly getting the info out there and only because people think they'll get some sort of entertainment value from it have they bothered to watch. But relying on an entertainment industry to deliver this type of information seems like a good way to get plenty wrong in the name of artistic license.

- We got news with a delay of months back in the superior decade; The 90's.
 
Sudan does have gold mines and oil deposits etc stuff.
Looks that 2(?) generals are fighting for some control like stuff in Sudan and yes....:(a lot of refugees...:(.
At least in one case they allowed some hours of ceasefire in order to allow refugees relocate from Hartum if they wanted.:(
 
‘Corpses on streets’: Sudan’s RSF kills 1,300 in Darfur, monitors say

The mass killing might be the largest in the civil war that erupted in April, based on reports from monitors.

By Mat Nashed
Published On 10 Nov 202310 Nov 2023

Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) besieged a camp for displaced people on November 2 after attacking a nearby army base in West Darfur. Over the next three days, the paramilitary group committed what may amount to the single largest mass killing since the civil war erupted in April.

Local monitors told Al Jazeera that about 1,300 people were killed, 2,000 injured and 310 remain missing.

“They went house to house to search for men and killed each one they found,” said Montesser Saddam*, who barely escaped the killing and arrived in Chad on Sunday. “There were so many corpses in the streets.”

The latest atrocities are part of a wider campaign by the RSF and its allied militias to eradicate the non-Arab Masalit tribe from West Darfur, according to activists and survivors.

Since the start of Sudan’s civil war, the United Nations and Western governments have condemned the systematic killing and displacement of the Masalit from their land. But the criticism and concern have not deterred the RSF from carrying out more atrocities.

A history of ethnic cleansing

For decades, Sudan’s central government neglected non-Arab farmers and Arab pastoralists in Darfur, pushing them to compete for fertile land and dwindling water resources.

Former President Omar al-Bashir exacerbated these tensions by pitting tribes against each other as part of a divide-and-rule strategy. In 2003, he armed Arab tribal militias and tasked them with crushing a mostly non-Arab rebellion, which started with protests against Darfur’s economic and political marginalisation.

About 300,000 people died in combat as well as from famine and disease brought on by the conflict. Rights groups and the UN accused these government-backed militias – known to victims as the janjaweed, or “devils on horseback” – of carrying out ethnic cleansing.

These same militias are now fighting alongside or under the banner of the RSF.

“They want to ethnically cleanse us,” said Nahid Hamid, a Masalit human rights lawyer who spoke to Al Jazeera from Cairo, Egypt where she now lives.

Hamid shared a video with Al Jazeera that she found over social media weeks ago that shows an RSF fighter holding a machine gun and speaking to the camera.

In the background, another fighter can be heard saying in Arabic, “Land of the Masalit? There is no more land for the Masalit.”

Tribal leaders targeted

According to a local human rights organisation, six tribal leaders and their families were killed during last week’s attack on the camp in Ardamata, a town in West Darfur.

Mohamad Arbab, 85, was one of them. RSF fighters stormed his home and killed him, his son and eight grandchildren, the group said. The Darfur Bar Association also reported that the Masalit tribal leader Abdelbasit Dina was killed with his wife, son and 50 other residents from their community.

“They want to kill [our leaders] so they can replace us with their own as well as Arabs from countries like Chad and Niger,” Hamid said, referring to the Arab mercenaries who have joined the RSF from across the region.

The RSF had previously executed the governor of West Darfur, Khamis Abubbakr, on June 16. He was abducted and killed just hours after he described the killings in his region as a “genocide” to the Saudi-television network Al-Hadath.

The United States eventually sanctioned Abdel Raheem Dagalo, the RSF’s second-in-command behind his younger brother Mohamad Hamdan “Hemedti” Dagalo, accusing him of overseeing atrocities in West Darfur. Local RSF commander Abdul Rahman Juma was also sanctioned for his alleged role in killing the governor.

On Wednesday, the US embassy in Sudan tweeted that it was concerned about reports that the RSF appointed Juma as commander of an army garrison it captured last week.

The statement also said it heard credible reports about “serious human rights abuses” committed recently in West Darfur.

Yousif Ezat, an RSF spokesperson who has previously denied allegations that the RSF cooperates with Arab militias to commit atrocities in the region, told Al Jazeera that he cannot deny or confirm whether the group committed atrocities in Ardamata. “I saw these reports in the media, but I don’t have information,” he said. “There is no [phone network] in West Darfur, so I wasn’t able to ask the commanders what happened.”

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023...-sudans-rsf-kills-1300-in-darfur-monitors-say



 
It ain't israel or ukraine, so the media doesn't care.

Mentioned it in the Hamas mega thread, but Arab Muslims are ethnically cleansing black Africans, even black Muslims, because not Arab.

Would love the progressive left that is screaming river to the sea right now, tackle this one.

Right now, the establishment is losing the narrative battle regarding Israel. Immediately, they should start reporting on this to regain some control, as the progressive left would implode
 
Mentioned it in the Hamas mega thread, but Arab Muslims are ethnically cleansing black Africans, even black Muslims, because not Arab.

Would love the progressive left that is screaming river to the sea right now, tackle this one.

Right now, the establishment is losing the narrative battle regarding Israel. Immediately, they should start reporting on this to regain some control, as the progressive left would implode
Arabs and jews are same. Their religions are same. Their mentality are same. They even openly call each other "genetic cousins".

That's why they will never be at peace with each other.

P.s. quran has several ayats directly discriminating blacks.

P.p.s.s. white ashkenazi jews are ethnically cleansing black ethiopean jews. In israel they intentionally gave infertility shots to ethiopean jewish women to decrease their numbers.
 
By that you just mean people.

People don't care.

Western people are not remotely interested, or it would get more coverage.
Because the entire continent has been a wood chipper for a very long time and there’s absolutely no clear path to peace in any of the regions
Congo is a mess
Libya is a mess
There has been so many coups in the last year I lost track

Nigeria is next and that’s going to be a real mess
 
Arabs and jews are same. Their religions are same. Their mentality are same. They even openly call each other "genetic cousins".

That's why they will never be at peace with each other.

P.s. quran has several ayats directly discriminating blacks.

P.p.s.s. white ashkenazi jews are ethnically cleansing black ethiopean jews. In israel they intentionally gave infertility shots to ethiopean jewish women to decrease their numbers.

I've never once heard arabs calls jews "genetic cousins". I've heard some jews say it, but never arabs. Whenever arabs talk about jews in israel, the comment is always 'they're European, they should go back there, they're nothing but colonizers in this land'.
 
I've never once heard arabs calls jews "genetic cousins". I've heard some jews say it, but never arabs. Whenever arabs talk about jews in israel, the comment is always 'they're European, they should go back there, they're nothing but colonizers in this land'.
It's in their holy book.
They know it, errybody know it.
They never admit it to a non-muslim though.
Amongt themselves they do.

P.s. as for arabs and jews in israel...

That shithole, no, whole middle bloody east should be walled off the rest of the world. HARD STEEL IRON MFING CURTAIN.
No one in, no one out.

Let them duke it out between themselves.

Maybe then we'll have some peace on this rock.
 
No white people involved = nobody cares a single fuck. If white people are involved a certain section of society can easily choose a side and post flags on social media for clout and praise. Myanmar is another example of this. Zero attention from the media because whites aren't involved.
 
No white people involved = nobody cares a single fuck. If white people are involved a certain section of society can easily choose a side and post flags on social media for clout and praise. Myanmar is another example of this. Zero attention from the media because whites aren't involved.

Indonesia waging genocidal war against indigenous Papuans in West Papua is another.

Ongoing extermination campaign against pygmies in central Africa by Bantus, too.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top