- Joined
- May 26, 2008
- Messages
- 2,603
- Reaction score
- 571
USADA DID NOT give Jon Jones 15 months, an independent arbitrator did...let me explain how this works.
USADA is responsible for the drug testing. In the event of a positive test, they notify the athlete, who then can have the B sample tested. If the B sample is also positive, USADA will adjudicate and offer up punishment. The athlete can accept this, or in Jon Jones' case, they can deny it and have a hearing with an independent arbitrator. These arbitrators ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH USADA, and as part of the UFC & USADA's agreement, the decision of the arbitrator is final.
Don't believe me?
https://ufc.usada.org/resources/frequently-asked-questions/
https://ufc.usada.org/testing/results/adjudication-process/
Stop accusing a legit organization of corruption...If your favorite athlete didn't appeal for arbitration, that is their fault for not using all the outlets available to them. If you want to blame anyone for a soft punishment, blame the folks at McLaren Global Sport Solutions Inc, and not USADA...USADA did their job.
USADA is responsible for the drug testing. In the event of a positive test, they notify the athlete, who then can have the B sample tested. If the B sample is also positive, USADA will adjudicate and offer up punishment. The athlete can accept this, or in Jon Jones' case, they can deny it and have a hearing with an independent arbitrator. These arbitrators ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH USADA, and as part of the UFC & USADA's agreement, the decision of the arbitrator is final.
Don't believe me?
https://ufc.usada.org/resources/frequently-asked-questions/
https://ufc.usada.org/testing/results/adjudication-process/
Stop accusing a legit organization of corruption...If your favorite athlete didn't appeal for arbitration, that is their fault for not using all the outlets available to them. If you want to blame anyone for a soft punishment, blame the folks at McLaren Global Sport Solutions Inc, and not USADA...USADA did their job.