Opinion Something is off with the NJ & Denmark drones story

[jefferz]

Oh, my bad. You're the fucking retard that said these were spy drones. Eat shit you dickless fuck.

Holy fuck. Did you even read the OP?

 

[Long Dark Blues]

Holy fuck. Did you even read the OP?

I did, one man's wild speculation. Which you indulged while asking a question about lights.

And I answered your question about those lights because my own speculation has nothing to do with spying but instead plain ol' government testing.

 

[jefferz]

I did, one man's wild speculation. Which you indulged while asking a question about lights.

And I answered your question about those lights because my own speculation has nothing to do with spying but instead plain ol' government testing.

If these were some sort of secret spy drone, why do they have lights on them?

Because they have to over United States air space, is my presumption.

 

[Long Dark Blues]

Exactly. I answered your question about lights.

 

[RemyR]

 

[Alpha_T83]

6-8 democratic governments conducting false flag operations some with Russian made drones is the much more likely than Russia currently conducting a hybrid warfare campaign against Europe.

Let me guess, you think Russia didn't invade Ukraine and believe NATO had biolabs?

 

[Cid]

The only ones Russian made were the ones over Poland, gerbera drones all silvertaped. The shinning ones over denmark "nobody" knows. The claim is that they would have been launched by ships since they were way outside the range from Russia borders. French just released the "suspicious" ship and there was no involvment with drones. In germany they got people and noone were russian.
And the stance of every country is "it could be russia, we dont know"

What russia has to gain in generating more anti russian sentiment in europe while at the same time trying to interfere in elections to put pro russian governments there? Wouldnt it backfire?

Btw i wouldnt even claim false flag since there's no strikes happening, just fearmongering. I dont trust russia, but I Wouldnt trust any of the eu goverments in this climate either. It's trump's world of politics, he gets away lying contantly.. if you think other politics wouldnt do the same I got a Bridge to sell you in Gaza

So politicians, leaders of some of the most highly developed, educated, highest press freedoms, best check and balances blah blah blah on earth are risking their careers possibly even incarceration to help a country they're already helping?

Because Americans elected a pathologically lying moron?

Fucking with the people they're paid to represent for.... altruistic reasons?


Can tell you've never lived in a highly developed country.

Really good countries have boring ass politicians bro. Because the people want boring ass politicians. They don't want politicians that are going make massive changes because that fucks with what they already have.

You acting like they're some Tom Clancy MF'ers causing panic amongst their constituents with this stupid shit says more about you and your politicians than it does theirs mate.

 

[Cid]

Let me guess, you think Russia didn't invade Ukraine and believe NATO had biolabs?

Uh... No.

My post is mocking that idea. I think you missed it.

The guy I was quoting might though.

 

[KBE6EKCTAH_CCP]

2
maybe that’s the case
officials didn’t want to admit they had no idea what the drones were, or risk creating panic.
But it also makes me wonder: why didn’t either the US or Denmark just shoot them down,
especially when they were over military bases and airports?
The only explanation I can think of is that shooting them could create dangerous debris falling onto civilians or critical infrastructure,
so maybe it felt ‘safer’ to let them fly than risk the fallout. what do you think ?
But letting unknown drones flying over restricted airspace just like that seems like a pretty big gamble ?

Here in Germany they have been restraining from doing anything, army says they don t have authority, police too, airport security too. But they have been accusing Russia though, like they did for North Stream 1 and the missiles fallen in Poland

 

[Losfer Words]

Coolest explanation is that’s it’s an underwater alien mothership that sends out drones to collect resources and data from the ocean and then they fly back in and they are like modular and deconstruct-able drones so it poops em out and then eats them back up

not really willing to accept any explanation that’s less cool but willing to hear equally or possibly more cool explanations

 

[SKYNET]

you're still talking about those drones? all the great things going on rn and you wanna talk about these creepy drones!

 

[Squarechoke]

2
maybe that’s the case
officials didn’t want to admit they had no idea what the drones were, or risk creating panic.
But it also makes me wonder: why didn’t either the US or Denmark just shoot them down,
especially when they were over military bases and airports?
The only explanation I can think of is that shooting them could create dangerous debris falling onto civilians or critical infrastructure,
so maybe it felt ‘safer’ to let them fly than risk the fallout. what do you think ?
But letting unknown drones flying over restricted airspace just like that seems like a pretty big gamble ?

The reason why they won't shoot down drones is generally that there is too much risk of collateral damage. Especially when there is no clear threat from the drones apart from being in the way in the airspace. If you suspected bomber drones then the risk would if course become more acceptable. That's why many drone defense systems aren't actually very useful in practice beyond spotting drones, at least in peace time.