• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Rick Santorum says Republicans offer nothing to blue collar workers

hahaha, alrighty. that's not how i see it.

now that huge generation is much older and pulls the country towards protecting the true landmark legislation that liberals passed, namely social security and medicare.

*cough*


- IGIT

This is hardly a shift. Meanwhile issues like taxes and guns and welfare have moved to the right.

And the govt makes people think those are benefits they paid for, not welfare. Hence people are pissed if after paying the "contributions" their whole lives they are cut off before its time to receive their money back.
 
hi James,

This is hardly a shift. Meanwhile issues like taxes and guns and welfare have moved to the right.

it actually is. as you get into your senior years, you don't really change...you're still looking out for "#1", and many seniors have their fortunes tied rather closely to the liberal legislation of FDR and LBJ.

on issues like taxes the country has moved to the right, if you mean that conservatives don't like to pay for things. you can quote GOP deficit hawks line and verse, but the fact is that conservatives lust for government spending - their record is pretty clear on that. most conservatives are conflicted liberals, when it comes to federal spending.

also, the majority of Americans favored the gun control measures proposed by Manchin Tommey. it just got squashed in congress. that doesn't mean that country is becoming more conservative, anymore than the SCOTUS sanctioning Mr. Obama's Affordable Care Act automatically means its becoming more liberal.

that's too simplistic.

And the govt makes people think those are benefits they paid for, not welfare. Hence people are pissed if after paying the "contributions" their whole lives they are cut off before its time to receive their money back.

the benefits are paid for, on one hand....and then again, they're not. old people are taking out more than they put in.

it's a tough spot, i think. if the GOP touch those entitlement programs, the Democrats not only eviscerate them, but they'll also be saying "bye bye" to Florida, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.

you can't blame the left, really. when Mr. Obama was reforming Medicare through the ACA and cutting spending on that program, the GOP howled to seniors that Mr. Obama was gutting their entitlement, scaremongering.

really for most modern era members of the GOP, someone like Santorum should be perfect. he loves, really loves, federal spending. he has a serious hard on for it, to be honest.
There’s no way to know for sure how many earmarks Santorum requested, since lawmakers weren’t required to attach their names to earmark requests until 2007. (Santorum served in the Senate from 1995 to 2007.)

The Club for Growth, in its presidential white-paper series, claims that Santorum “requested billions of dollars for pork projects,” while the Perry campaign is alleging that Santorum requested over $1 billion in earmarks.

Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, views the $1 billion–plus figure as a plausible estimate. “As a matter of fact, I would probably peg it probably a little higher,” he says.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/287371/santorums-earmark-record-katrina-trinko

- IGIT
 
Last edited:
hi James,

it actually is. as you get into your senior years, you don't really change...you're still looking out for "#1", and many seniors have their fortunes tied rather closely to the liberal legislation of FDR and LBJ.
When I say it's not a shift I mean it is a left wing position that same generation has held their entire lives. It is also a left wing position the republican party has accepted going back to the liberal consensus. So telling me how socialist it is says nothing about whether the country has moved to the right when we've had a consensus on this particular socialist program the whole time.

Now if you want to argue whether the US today is to the left or right of that of the 1920's, well, you might be able to make a good case there. But the point of this discussion is liberals being pulled to the right by society. And liberals per se didn't even exist back then, the left wingers were called the progressive movement. The left wing came out of the 60's basically.

on issues like taxes the country has moved to the right, if you mean that conservatives don't like to pay for things. you can quote GOP deficit hawks line and verse, but the fact is that conservatives lust for government spending - their record is pretty clear on that. most conservatives are conflicted liberals, when it comes to federal spending.

also, the majority of Americans favored the gun control measures proposed by Manchin Tommey. it just got squashed in congress. that doesn't mean that country is becoming more conservative, anymore than the SCOTUS sanctioning Mr. Obama's Affordable Care Act automatically means its becoming more liberal.

that's too simplistic.

the benefits are paid for, on one hand....and then again, they're not. old people are taking out more than they put in.

it's a tough spot, i think. if the GOP touch those entitlement programs, the Democrats not only eviscerate them, but they'll also be saying "bye bye" to Florida, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.

you can't blame the left, really. when Mr. Obama was reforming Medicare through the ACA and cutting spending on that program, the GOP howled to seniors that Mr. Obama was gutting their entitlement, scaremongering.

really for most modern era members of the GOP, someone like Santorum should be perfect. he loves, really loves, federal spending. he has a serious hard on for it, to be honest.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/287371/santorums-earmark-record-katrina-trinko

- IGIT

As for gun control, see poll results that look like so:

n9ggmdee1k60atawqdbprq.gif


As for your arguments about good economics versus fantasy-land, this is not relevant to the point, which is whether or not they are supporting a liberal viewpoint. For example, whether or not seniors are accurate in thinking they are participating in a contribution-based plan versus a welfare plan, the fact is they think it is a contribution-based plan. "Hands off my social security" is a different demand than "maintain the social safety net so I can live on the public dole".
 
Of course he's right. I think if they want to win elections, they are going to have to change. You can't fool everybody all the time!
 
I wish I had never discovered this back when he was running for pres. I swear to god I get nauseous every time I read anything about the guy because of this double meaning of his name. I hope he never makes his way back to the national sphere, my stomach can't handle it.

As much as I despise Santorum's ideology, this chosen vocabulary attack by a certain segment of the gay community really reveals the sort of pathology inherent in their orientation disorder.
 
LMAO. Right on cue, the GOP jumps into action:

You should be jumping for joy, the minimum wage increase mainly affects new people to the job market. Guess who those people mainly are? White teenagers or college students.

Minimum wage hardly ever helps the people that liberals like to think it will help because most working people who have had a job for more than a year make more than minimum wage.

The single mom working to help her kids and minorities are more than likely already makes more than minimum wage. Skateboarder 18 year old Nathan from a middleclass white home who is getting his first job will be getting an increase.


Why do you hate single moms and minorities so much??

Among those paid by the hour in 2013, 1.5 million were reported as earning exactly the prevailing federal minimum wage. About 1.8 million were reported as earning wages below the minimum. Together, these 3.3 million workers with wages at or below the minimum represent, respectively: 1.0% of the population, 1.6% of the labor force, 2.5% of all workers, and 4.3% of hourly workers.[3]



Raising it to $10.10 in the next 2 years is way to fast of an increase. $3 dollars in 2 years is faster than the last increase of $2.
 
Last edited:
You should be jumping for joy, the minimum wage increase mainly affects new people to the job market. Guess who those people mainly are? White teenagers or college students.

hi CableandThanos,

due to the nature of the current recovery, this isn't exactly true any longer.

...pushed older people who can't get re-hired down into the jobs that used to be the exclusive province of teens and young adults: Even fast food restaurants will often opt for a 55-year-old over a 17-year-old, if given the option.

Nationally, a higher percentage of people over the age of 55 had jobs in 2011 than were working in 2000. "You're more likely to see a grandmother at the McDonald's window than a teenager," says Chris Payne, director of the University of North Carolina-Greensboro's Center for Youth and Family Partnerships. "It's really striking."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...teenagers-are-being-left-out-of-the-recovery/

- IGIT
 
hi again James,

When I say it's not a shift I mean it is a left wing position that same generation has held their entire lives.

again, that is not exactly true. in fact, the formative years of the baby boomers occurred under the "greatest generation" - the Eisenhower era.

It is also a left wing position the republican party has accepted going back to the liberal consensus.

it doesn't have that much to do with liberal consensus, though. it's just a realpolitik sort of thing. the old and the vulnerable (and just being old makes you more vulnerable) grasped that they need social security, something that was borne of the depression era old people not having a pot to piss in as the economy collapsed.

likewise, LBJ's medicare and medicaid weren't programs that conservatives "accepted", lol, it was one they needed. it doesn't matter if you're some crazed liberal or Ayn Rand (the goddamned hypocrite), they all grabbed for their entitlements when they needed them.

as people age, they may become more conservative socially, its sort of part of getting old - you get left a bit behind, however, they sure as hell cling to liberal, big spending entitlement programs.

if you don't believe me, lets watch the GOP primaries and see what the candidates say about social security, medicare and medicaid when they land in Florida.

So telling me how socialist it is says nothing about whether the country has moved to the right when we've had a consensus on this particular socialist program the whole time.

not the whole time. go and read up on Social Security, in particular. there were cries of SOCIALISM, and fear mongering that it would destroy the job market, and on and on. it's the third rail of politics now, but it wasn't a half century ago.
Now if you want to argue whether the US today is to the left or right of that of the 1920's, well, you might be able to make a good case there. But the point of this discussion is liberals being pulled to the right by society. And liberals per se didn't even exist back then, the left wingers were called the progressive movement. The left wing came out of the 60's basically.

it doesn't matter how you label it, liberal, democratic, progressive, what have you - the country as a whole is drifting toward the left, socially. it's not occurring on a smooth arc, but it's undeniable.

fiscally, it's hard to say. under Mr. Reagan and Mr. W. Bush, government spending grew at a startling, never-before-seen rate. then again, under Mr. Clinton and Mr. Obama, the growth in government spending abated somewhat.

taxes seem very, very low - but then again the biggest tax cuts in my earning lifetime have happened under Mr. Obama. so maybe there is a drift to the right on that count.

in terms of foreign policy, the public at large seems positively dovish nowadays, so that i guess would be a drift to the left also.

as to your poll;

n9ggmdee1k60atawqdbprq.gif


your poll has nothing to do with Manchin Toomey, which had nothing to do with repealing the 2nd amendment. i don't grasp the significance of that poll. i cited Manchin Toomey as an example of how the country seems to be sliding to the left on the issue.

Manchin Toomey polled very high, across party lines.

- IGIT
 
in terms of foreign policy, the public at large seems positively dovish nowadays, so that i guess would be a drift to the left also.
Whoa there. We were just talking about history. The left loves war. FDR? Kennedy? LBJ? Even Bill Clinton.

Both the left and right have antiwar factions, pacifists and flat out enemy-sympathizers on the left, paleo's and isolationists on the right.

as to your poll;

n9ggmdee1k60atawqdbprq.gif


your poll has nothing to do with Manchin Toomey, which had nothing to do with repealing the 2nd amendment. i don't grasp the significance of that poll. i cited Manchin Toomey as an example of how the country seems to be sliding to the left on the issue.

Manchin Toomey polled very high, across party lines.

- IGIT
Come on. The most plainly-obvious trend is apparent there and you're gonna try to sidestep it altogether?

Your bill is about background checks right? You know we already have background checks everywhere else. A very narrow technical point to extrapolate to all of society "sliding to the left".
 
not the whole time. go and read up on Social Security, in particular. there were cries of SOCIALISM, and fear mongering that it would destroy the job market, and on and on. it's the third rail of politics now, but it wasn't a half century ago.
Thanks but I know the history just fine. Yes reagan called it socialism in the 60's then had to eat his words and swear he supported it when he ran in the 80's. "There you go again" was his famous counter to Carter when carter tried to claim Reagan was anti-entitlement.

Dole also opposed it in the 60's and had to swear his fealty to it in the 90's.

The is exactly what I referred to in the consensus on the entitlements that has existed in this country. It merely continues.
 
Back
Top