Crime Probe-target hits Mueller with criminal complaint, says special counsel sought false testimony

glenwo2

Adamantium Belt
@Gold
Joined
Mar 2, 2014
Messages
15,458
Reaction score
768
Probe-target hits Mueller with criminal complaint, says special counsel sought false testimony

Conservative author Jerome Corsi on Monday filed a “criminal and ethics complaint” against Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, accusing investigators of trying to bully him into giving “false testimony” against President Trump.

The complaint, which Corsi had threatened for days, is the latest escalation between Mueller’s team and its investigation targets.

The 78-page document, asserting the existence of a “slow-motion coup against the president,” was filed to a range of top law enforcement officials including Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, D.C.’s U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu and the Bar Disciplinary Counsel.

“Dr. Corsi has been criminally threatened and coerced to tell a lie and call it the truth,” the complaint states.

Corsi, who wrote the anti-President Obama book "The Obama Nation" and is connected with political operative Roger Stone, has claimed for the past week that he was being improperly pressured by Mueller’s team to strike a plea deal which he now says he won’t sign.

According to Corsi’s complaint, they wanted him to demonstrate that he acted as a liaison between Stone and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on one side and the Trump campaign on the other, regarding the release of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee.

The complaint states that Mueller’s office is now “knowingly and deceitfully threatening to charge Dr. Corsi with an alleged false statement,” unless he gives them “false testimony” against Trump and others.

The purported threat of a false statement charge, according to the complaint, pertains to a July 2016 email from Stone asking him to “get to” Assange and get the pending emails.

Corsi’s complaint says he was unable to initially give “accurate” testimony on that point, until he could reload emails on his laptop. The complaint says he later amended his answers. In an interview last week with Fox News’ "Tucker Carlson Tonight," Corsi said Mueller’s team “was happy” with his answers until he couldn’t “give them what they wanted.”

Asked about Monday's complaint, Mueller spokesman Peter Carr said they would decline to comment, as did a Justice Department spokesman.

As part of complaint, Corsi’s legal team included a draft court filing from Mueller’s team to be used for Corsi to plead guilty to making false statements.

That document includes an Aug. 2, 2016 email between Corsi and Stone, where Corsi references Assange and the forthcoming release of hacked emails.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps,” Corsi wrote to Stone, about 10 weeks before Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails were released.

In the complaint on Monday, Corsi’s lawyers denied that Corsi had inside knowledge and was colluding with Assange. Instead, they make the argument Corsi “logically colluded” more emails would be released.

“Employing his professional skills and considerable experience as an analyst and investigative journalist, Dr. Corsi logically concluded that WikiLeaks would release Podesta’s emails soon in a second round ‘data dump’ from the same group of DNC emails stolen on July 5, 2016,” the complaint reads.

Corsi, the onetime Washington bureau chief of the right-wing website Infowars, told host Tucker Carlson last week that he has had "no contact with Julian Assange whatsoever."



>>> Of course they'd decline to comment. They didn't expect their "Victims" to fight back like this. <Lmaoo>

BTW, “slow-motion coup against the president" is a perfect description of the Mueller Probe.
 
Gotta wonder why the ones who hate Trump the most are long time bureaucrats and the corporate media...

How anybody can side with those people just boggles the mind.
 
Gotta wonder why the ones who hate Trump the most are long time bureaucrats and the corporate media...

How anybody can side with those people just boggles the mind.

Most are brainwashed sheeple n believe everything they hear on msm
 
Just curious, what do you think the result of this totally legit complaint will be?

Do you expect the Deep State to defeat such a well-toothed and gnarly challenge?
 
Probe-target hits Mueller with criminal complaint, says special counsel sought false testimony

Conservative author Jerome Corsi on Monday filed a “criminal and ethics complaint” against Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, accusing investigators of trying to bully him into giving “false testimony” against President Trump.

The complaint, which Corsi had threatened for days, is the latest escalation between Mueller’s team and its investigation targets.

The 78-page document, asserting the existence of a “slow-motion coup against the president,” was filed to a range of top law enforcement officials including Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, D.C.’s U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu and the Bar Disciplinary Counsel.

“Dr. Corsi has been criminally threatened and coerced to tell a lie and call it the truth,” the complaint states.

Corsi, who wrote the anti-President Obama book "The Obama Nation" and is connected with political operative Roger Stone, has claimed for the past week that he was being improperly pressured by Mueller’s team to strike a plea deal which he now says he won’t sign.

According to Corsi’s complaint, they wanted him to demonstrate that he acted as a liaison between Stone and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on one side and the Trump campaign on the other, regarding the release of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee.

The complaint states that Mueller’s office is now “knowingly and deceitfully threatening to charge Dr. Corsi with an alleged false statement,” unless he gives them “false testimony” against Trump and others.

The purported threat of a false statement charge, according to the complaint, pertains to a July 2016 email from Stone asking him to “get to” Assange and get the pending emails.

Corsi’s complaint says he was unable to initially give “accurate” testimony on that point, until he could reload emails on his laptop. The complaint says he later amended his answers. In an interview last week with Fox News’ "Tucker Carlson Tonight," Corsi said Mueller’s team “was happy” with his answers until he couldn’t “give them what they wanted.”

Asked about Monday's complaint, Mueller spokesman Peter Carr said they would decline to comment, as did a Justice Department spokesman.

As part of complaint, Corsi’s legal team included a draft court filing from Mueller’s team to be used for Corsi to plead guilty to making false statements.

That document includes an Aug. 2, 2016 email between Corsi and Stone, where Corsi references Assange and the forthcoming release of hacked emails.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps,” Corsi wrote to Stone, about 10 weeks before Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails were released.

In the complaint on Monday, Corsi’s lawyers denied that Corsi had inside knowledge and was colluding with Assange. Instead, they make the argument Corsi “logically colluded” more emails would be released.

“Employing his professional skills and considerable experience as an analyst and investigative journalist, Dr. Corsi logically concluded that WikiLeaks would release Podesta’s emails soon in a second round ‘data dump’ from the same group of DNC emails stolen on July 5, 2016,” the complaint reads.

Corsi, the onetime Washington bureau chief of the right-wing website Infowars, told host Tucker Carlson last week that he has had "no contact with Julian Assange whatsoever."



>>> Of course they'd decline to comment. They didn't expect their "Victims" to fight back like this. <Lmaoo>

BTW, “slow-motion coup against the president" is a perfect description of the Mueller Probe.

Uhm...this is it? This is the thing that will end the Mueller probe?
 
Gotta wonder why the ones who hate Trump the most are long time bureaucrats and the corporate media...

How anybody can side with those people just boggles the mind.

Yes, the corporate media hate Trump for....lowering their taxes, lessening their responsibility to shareholders, driving up their ratings, and giving them more power over their employees.

Also, people side with them because they have some semblance of honesty and remote good intention.
 
Gotta wonder why the ones who hate Trump the most are long time bureaucrats and the corporate media...

How anybody can side with those people just boggles the mind.
I'm still waiting to hear what Trump has done to make anyone in this country's life worse. So far it's "he cut taxes for people that I wish had less money". Economy is good, employment is good, taxes are lower and I'm supposed to be pissed about tweets.
 
Yes, the corporate media hate Trump for....lowering their taxes, lessening their responsibility to shareholders, driving up their ratings, and giving them more power over their employees.

Also, people side with them because they have some semblance of honesty and remote good intention.

Long time bureaucrats have honesty and good intentions? Up your trolling game, bro. It's getting weak.
 
Long time bureaucrats have honesty and good intentions? Up your trolling game, bro. It's getting weak.

On average and compared to Trump? Yeah, it's not close.

Sorry that you have to make up shadowy monoliths to make your worldview coherent. Frankly, I'd be shocked if you even were able to explain what a "bureaucrat" is.
 
On average and compared to Trump? Yeah, it's not close.

Sorry that you have to make up shadowy monoliths to make your worldview coherent. Frankly, I'd be shocked if you even were able to explain what a "bureaucrat" is.

I cant even take you seriously enough to care. You're a well disguised troll, but a troll nonetheless. Guaranteed you don't even believe most of this shit you post anyway.
 
Probe-target hits Mueller with criminal complaint, says special counsel sought false testimony

Conservative author Jerome Corsi on Monday filed a “criminal and ethics complaint” against Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, accusing investigators of trying to bully him into giving “false testimony” against President Trump.

The complaint, which Corsi had threatened for days, is the latest escalation between Mueller’s team and its investigation targets.

The 78-page document, asserting the existence of a “slow-motion coup against the president,” was filed to a range of top law enforcement officials including Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, D.C.’s U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu and the Bar Disciplinary Counsel.

“Dr. Corsi has been criminally threatened and coerced to tell a lie and call it the truth,” the complaint states.

Corsi, who wrote the anti-President Obama book "The Obama Nation" and is connected with political operative Roger Stone, has claimed for the past week that he was being improperly pressured by Mueller’s team to strike a plea deal which he now says he won’t sign.

According to Corsi’s complaint, they wanted him to demonstrate that he acted as a liaison between Stone and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on one side and the Trump campaign on the other, regarding the release of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee.

The complaint states that Mueller’s office is now “knowingly and deceitfully threatening to charge Dr. Corsi with an alleged false statement,” unless he gives them “false testimony” against Trump and others.

The purported threat of a false statement charge, according to the complaint, pertains to a July 2016 email from Stone asking him to “get to” Assange and get the pending emails.

Corsi’s complaint says he was unable to initially give “accurate” testimony on that point, until he could reload emails on his laptop. The complaint says he later amended his answers. In an interview last week with Fox News’ "Tucker Carlson Tonight," Corsi said Mueller’s team “was happy” with his answers until he couldn’t “give them what they wanted.”

Asked about Monday's complaint, Mueller spokesman Peter Carr said they would decline to comment, as did a Justice Department spokesman.

As part of complaint, Corsi’s legal team included a draft court filing from Mueller’s team to be used for Corsi to plead guilty to making false statements.

That document includes an Aug. 2, 2016 email between Corsi and Stone, where Corsi references Assange and the forthcoming release of hacked emails.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps,” Corsi wrote to Stone, about 10 weeks before Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails were released.

In the complaint on Monday, Corsi’s lawyers denied that Corsi had inside knowledge and was colluding with Assange. Instead, they make the argument Corsi “logically colluded” more emails would be released.

“Employing his professional skills and considerable experience as an analyst and investigative journalist, Dr. Corsi logically concluded that WikiLeaks would release Podesta’s emails soon in a second round ‘data dump’ from the same group of DNC emails stolen on July 5, 2016,” the complaint reads.

Corsi, the onetime Washington bureau chief of the right-wing website Infowars, told host Tucker Carlson last week that he has had "no contact with Julian Assange whatsoever."



>>> Of course they'd decline to comment. They didn't expect their "Victims" to fight back like this. <Lmaoo>

BTW, “slow-motion coup against the president" is a perfect description of the Mueller Probe.
This wall of text gave you the conclusion that "this is it" for Muller and your biggest gotcha was that they declined to comment on this bs from Corsi?
Wow. You've really got your finger on the pulse of the truth. Very insightful.
 
I'm still waiting to hear what Trump has done to make anyone in this country's life worse. So far it's "he cut taxes for people that I wish had less money". Economy is good, employment is good, taxes are lower and I'm supposed to be pissed about tweets.

You should care that "he cut taxes for people that I wish had less money" because he exploded our deficit - and that resulting debt will have to be repaid through future taxes (which will be spread across wage earners) and spending reductions, despite a projected and inevitable need to increase spending across the world economy in future decades. He's sacrificed our economic future and the prospects of future generations to not be saddled by needless debt, just to give a giveaway to the ultra-rich against the advice of basically all economists.

Also, "the economy is good" is a non sequitur. It is absolutely no better than would have been expected prior to his election, and it could have been achieved without slashing environmental protections, busting unions, cutting consumer protections and the ability for citizens scammed or injured by corporations to seek redress, selling off public lands and wealth to private profiteers, shifting investment away from future technologies and toward dying ones, or gutting financial oversight bodies that were instated to prevent Trump-types from looting the economy like in 2008.

I would like to pretend that there's a chance that you'll heed this obvious information and not just make a "there's nothing Trump has done bad, lower taxes are gooooood" post next week. But I've been burned before.

I cant even take you seriously enough to care. You're a well disguised troll, but a troll nonetheless. Guaranteed you don't even believe most of this shit you post anyway.

Yeah, you still haven't made anything even close to a point that makes sense. So, I'll ask you again: why would corporate media hate Trump for lowering their taxes, lessening their responsibility to shareholders, driving up their ratings, and giving them more power over their employees?

And, in addition to that, please qualify (or explain in any way) your statement about longtime government servants being less honest and good-intentioned than the most dishonest politician in American history who has endless conflicts of interest.

We're all waiting. It's your time to shine.
 
If true, then the Mueller team needs to be investigated.
 
You should care that "he cut taxes for people that I wish had less money" because he exploded our deficit - and that resulting debt will have to be repaid through future taxes (which will be spread across wage earners) and spending reductions, despite a projected and inevitable need to increase spending across the world economy in future decades. He's sacrificed our economic future and the prospects of future generations to not be saddled by needless debt, just to give a giveaway to the ultra-rich against the advice of basically all economists.

Also, "the economy is good" is a non sequitur. It is absolutely no better than would have been expected prior to his election, and it could have been achieved without slashing environmental protections, busting unions, cutting consumer protections and the ability for citizens scammed or injured by corporations to seek redress, selling off public lands and wealth to private profiteers, shifting investment away from future technologies and toward dying ones, or gutting financial oversight bodies that were instated to prevent Trump-types from looting the economy like in 2008.

I would like to pretend that there's a chance that you'll heed this obvious information and not just make a "there's nothing Trump has done bad, lower taxes are gooooood" post next week. But I've been burned before.



Yeah, you still haven't made anything even close to a point that makes sense. So, I'll ask you again: why would corporate media hate Trump for lowering their taxes, lessening their responsibility to shareholders, driving up their ratings, and giving them more power over their employees?

And, in addition to that, please qualify (or explain in any way) your statement about longtime government servants being less honest and good-intentioned than the most dishonest politician in American history who has endless conflicts of interest.

We're all waiting. It's your time to shine.
Tax revenue is up, my friend.


 
Tax revenue is up, my friend.

With all due respect, derp.

RevenueFallen_FY_2.PNG

chart-tax-revenues-Goldwein-08132018.png

http://www.crfb.org/blogs/has-revenue-risen-2018
 
Yeah, you still haven't made anything even close to a point that makes sense. So, I'll ask you again: why would corporate media hate Trump for lowering their taxes, lessening their responsibility to shareholders, driving up their ratings, and giving them more power over their employees?

And, in addition to that, please qualify (or explain in any way) your statement about longtime government servants being less honest and good-intentioned than the most dishonest politician in American history who has endless conflicts of interest.

We're all waiting. It's your time to shine.

You tell me why the media hates him. Because it's pretty obvious they do. Like I said, you're a troll and you take Sherdog way too seriously. I bet you keep a spreadsheet with profiles on different posters here. Let me guess, you're going to launch into an argument about how the media actually likes Trump, right? Aren't you the guy who said a while back that "the left just doesn't have the appetite for outrage"? Lol.

c8kFJLNM53URrxXRyvmFf8.jpg
 
You tell me why the media hates him. Because it's pretty obvious they do. Like I said, you're a troll and you take Sherdog way too seriously. I bet you keep a spreadsheet with profiles on different posters here. Let me guess, you're going to launch into an argument about how the media actually likes Trump, right? Aren't you the guy who said a while back that "the left just doesn't have the appetite for outrage"? Lol.

c8kFJLNM53URrxXRyvmFf8.jpg

So you can't actually explain your bald assertion? And you admit it makes no sense?

Shit post on, then. But don't act like you're rustling anybody, when merely asking you to give some sort of explanation for your claims makes you spin out into a hissy fit because you're angry that you're too stupid to understand just how stupid you are.
 
So you can't actually explain your bald assertion? And you admit it makes no sense?

Shit post on, then. But don't act like you're rustling anybody, when merely asking you to give some sort of explanation for your claims makes you spin out into a hissy fit because you're angry that you're too stupid to understand just how stupid you are.

What explanation is needed? You'd have to be blind and deaf to not see that the majority of the media leans left, and hates Trump.

Is this where you try to claim that giving Trump so much coverage proves that they love him, regardless of the content of the coverage? That's the Jackie go to, so I assume that's yours too.
 
So.........the Feds have evidence they believe rises to the level where they believe they could convict Corsi on a false statements charge. They offer him a plea deal in return for cooperation. He rejects it. This isn't coercion or unethical. Certainly not criminal.

I must be missing something.
 
Back
Top