- Joined
- Feb 22, 2005
- Messages
- 53,520
- Reaction score
- 31,706
Here is the second installment of the "Positioning Topic." As mentioned before I'm going to attempt to work this a little backwards. I wanted to first familiarize you with good positioning in Part 1. Now that you're aware of that, I'd like to look back at some recent fighters who would not have had bad things happen to them had they had some of their training time spent on how they are positioned. This is something I notice is starting to plague American Amateur boxing, which HEAVILY favors busy, aggressive fighters. So offensively they look the goods, but then it gets weird when the opponent doesn't go away. As I stated in apizur's thread on hips, you sacrifice a whole aspect of defense if you solely rely on legs and arms to protect you. Especially if you get to the point where you can't use those in a fight, you become a sitting duck. Check out this bout with highly-touted American prospect Mark Davis, and fairly unsung Michael Farenas. At times, Davis appears to have every significant advantage, and looks like an offensive dynamo, then things get very interesting when that proves to not be enough:
Davis also made the mistake of never establishing control of distance. In his methodology, he WANTS to get close enough to hit. Yet he doesn't appear to be concerned with being close enough to BE hit. In boxing, we need to find critical distance (where you can land punches, but it is difficult for your opponent to land) and remain there as much as possible. For Davis, the shorter-armed fighter, his critical distance would actually be middle-distance. Just inside the longer-armed fighter's reach where it would be awkward for him to throw, but comfortable for Davis. And yet Davis repeatedly attacks from too far, or gets too close to do his best work.
Establishing control of distance is often done with the jab. If you reach out and CAN touch the guy, there he is. If you can't, you're too far. If you can't even jab, you're a bit too close. But the same can be said for catching jabs. If you position your glove to catch, and when the opponent fired he touches that glove, there he is. But control of distance begins before that, it begins with beginning position. This photo of Joe Louis will demonstrate:
If Joe lowers that lead hand too far, the opponent sees it as a sign to walk in. Which is alright if that is the intention and Joe has set a trap. But (and this is for all the "hands up" folks), the OFFENSIVE THREAT is the reason to keep it at least chest level. The opponent needs to believe you WILL try to hurt them if they step forward. Not because you're mean-muggin' them, but because your hand is in position to and will do so easily. I like to say the lead hand is more like a gun or knife, if you point it at someone they'll feel threatened, tense, uncomfortable. If you point it away even slightly, they'll feel much better. Two guys with guns aimed AT each other:
If Art (left) lowers his right hand, I (right) go in knowing he has one weapon only at use, and if he misses with that, he's fucked. And out of the two of us, whomever is the most threatened and tries to fight AROUND the other's lead hand, that one is fucked. Now if you think back to the thread on center line I stressed the lead foot. If the hand isn't in place, the foot will help. But idealistically, it would be both, and with a stance solid enough in foundation that if a person touches you, they feel that solidity. This gives the first impression to a guy that they shouldn't want to fight you. It shouldn't need to be established just by flinging punches, by working hard. Something that is rewarded highly in the current U.S. Amateur system.
Here's another recent example of a young prospect, who is SUPPOSED to win his fight against a faded veteran. But due to not having any fall-back to being made to defend himself. things don't go as planned:
One thing about veteran fighters like Campillo, and Farenas above. They learn how to get out of the way of punches and be in SOMETHING of a position to hit you back.
But just to show this isn't ENTIRELY an American problem. Here's a Hungarian kid who was 14-0 with 13 KO's, and was supposed to win this fight:
Of course, the higher profile versions of this are the losses of Adrien Broner and recently J'Leon Love, who lost to far more rustic fighters. Broner of course trying to imitate Floyd, but not REALLY knowing the Crab style (same with Andre Berto). And side-note, Broner looked GREAT in that fight when he marched forward and threw punches, but many guys who come up like that simply can't maintain such a pace for an entire fight. Then there was Love getting systematically walked down by Medina and the second he planted his feet in a poor position, got his lights turned out. Medina did a lovely job of controlling both distance and utilizing better positioning despite being heralded as the inferior fighter technically:
Another fighter (not American) who has been historically plagued by lack of positioning and distance control is Billy Dib. But his lack of control is different. This is from the same show as the above fight of Mark Davis, but watch how Dib actually boxes fairly on the outside, yet cannot resist going to the inside, where everything doesn't go exactly as planned:
Every fight of Dib's I've seen recently has this same motif. He does decently outside, inevitably ends up on the inside and looks like a fighter who hasn't really trained to fight there. Sure Dib still won that bout, but did it need to be that difficult? He could have stayed outside and won that fight by a mile, maybe even stopped the guy, or he could have utilized better tactics on the inside and not taken so much damage there from a guy he was supposed to kick the shit out of.
Now, to reflect on all this just remember that cornering of Whitaker by Georgie Benton and him telling Whitaker to "stand there and let him swing." NONE of these guys appear as if they could handle that sort of thing.
Davis also made the mistake of never establishing control of distance. In his methodology, he WANTS to get close enough to hit. Yet he doesn't appear to be concerned with being close enough to BE hit. In boxing, we need to find critical distance (where you can land punches, but it is difficult for your opponent to land) and remain there as much as possible. For Davis, the shorter-armed fighter, his critical distance would actually be middle-distance. Just inside the longer-armed fighter's reach where it would be awkward for him to throw, but comfortable for Davis. And yet Davis repeatedly attacks from too far, or gets too close to do his best work.
Establishing control of distance is often done with the jab. If you reach out and CAN touch the guy, there he is. If you can't, you're too far. If you can't even jab, you're a bit too close. But the same can be said for catching jabs. If you position your glove to catch, and when the opponent fired he touches that glove, there he is. But control of distance begins before that, it begins with beginning position. This photo of Joe Louis will demonstrate:

If Joe lowers that lead hand too far, the opponent sees it as a sign to walk in. Which is alright if that is the intention and Joe has set a trap. But (and this is for all the "hands up" folks), the OFFENSIVE THREAT is the reason to keep it at least chest level. The opponent needs to believe you WILL try to hurt them if they step forward. Not because you're mean-muggin' them, but because your hand is in position to and will do so easily. I like to say the lead hand is more like a gun or knife, if you point it at someone they'll feel threatened, tense, uncomfortable. If you point it away even slightly, they'll feel much better. Two guys with guns aimed AT each other:

If Art (left) lowers his right hand, I (right) go in knowing he has one weapon only at use, and if he misses with that, he's fucked. And out of the two of us, whomever is the most threatened and tries to fight AROUND the other's lead hand, that one is fucked. Now if you think back to the thread on center line I stressed the lead foot. If the hand isn't in place, the foot will help. But idealistically, it would be both, and with a stance solid enough in foundation that if a person touches you, they feel that solidity. This gives the first impression to a guy that they shouldn't want to fight you. It shouldn't need to be established just by flinging punches, by working hard. Something that is rewarded highly in the current U.S. Amateur system.
Here's another recent example of a young prospect, who is SUPPOSED to win his fight against a faded veteran. But due to not having any fall-back to being made to defend himself. things don't go as planned:
One thing about veteran fighters like Campillo, and Farenas above. They learn how to get out of the way of punches and be in SOMETHING of a position to hit you back.
But just to show this isn't ENTIRELY an American problem. Here's a Hungarian kid who was 14-0 with 13 KO's, and was supposed to win this fight:
Of course, the higher profile versions of this are the losses of Adrien Broner and recently J'Leon Love, who lost to far more rustic fighters. Broner of course trying to imitate Floyd, but not REALLY knowing the Crab style (same with Andre Berto). And side-note, Broner looked GREAT in that fight when he marched forward and threw punches, but many guys who come up like that simply can't maintain such a pace for an entire fight. Then there was Love getting systematically walked down by Medina and the second he planted his feet in a poor position, got his lights turned out. Medina did a lovely job of controlling both distance and utilizing better positioning despite being heralded as the inferior fighter technically:
Another fighter (not American) who has been historically plagued by lack of positioning and distance control is Billy Dib. But his lack of control is different. This is from the same show as the above fight of Mark Davis, but watch how Dib actually boxes fairly on the outside, yet cannot resist going to the inside, where everything doesn't go exactly as planned:
Every fight of Dib's I've seen recently has this same motif. He does decently outside, inevitably ends up on the inside and looks like a fighter who hasn't really trained to fight there. Sure Dib still won that bout, but did it need to be that difficult? He could have stayed outside and won that fight by a mile, maybe even stopped the guy, or he could have utilized better tactics on the inside and not taken so much damage there from a guy he was supposed to kick the shit out of.
Now, to reflect on all this just remember that cornering of Whitaker by Georgie Benton and him telling Whitaker to "stand there and let him swing." NONE of these guys appear as if they could handle that sort of thing.
Last edited: