Law ***PAYBACK: Barr Assigns Top Prosecutor to Russia BS / UPDATE REPORT LEAKS START***

Is this IT?

  • Total voters
    94
Status
Not open for further replies.
Darkballs said:
Well I often forget that I have to use really specific language with you dipshits. I figured, since you guys were saying that we'd see criminal convictions related to spying on trump, or a coup, or whatever other stupid language you've switched between, that this would be the standard for our bet.
But silly me, holding you guys to your useless boasts.

So now you want to move it to any convictions, for anyone, and cry about how people aren't taking your bet? You couldn't walk the goalposts back any further and still cry about it.

Let me know when you want to actually stand behind some tangible predictions.
Click to expand...

But we'd just be using the same goalposts as u have with the Mueller investigation.

It's ok. You shot off your mouth then dick tucked. No biggie and nothing new
 
hillelslovak87 said:
By all means, then, post it. I'd like to see the pic you think is me.

Btw, here is the real me
#GrandpaJackD
49F5BE8500000578-5473753-image-a-9_1520442465319.jpg
Click to expand...
That would explain the dementia.
 
georges snipierre said:
This thread is ruining the rest of the war room and should be sent to the great beyond or deleted altogether.
Click to expand...

The derailing is strong in this thread

Maybe it's time to shit up the Mueller safe space thread V.35 the same way a few of the DNC drones have done here
 
SBJJ said:
The derailing is strong in this thread

Maybe it's time to shit up the Mueller safe space thread V.35 the same way a few of the DNC drones have done here
Click to expand...
Tbh I thought this was that thread.
 
SBJJ said:
This didn't age well, seeing that you were outed as yourself not reading the report.

Also, as I've said many times. Provide 3 posts where you attack the DNC and/or support Trump. You know, because u keep saying you are not a Schill even though your posts 100% show you to be one.
Click to expand...

On the first sentence: Are you fucking stupid?

On you wanting me to provide 3 posts of me attacking the DNC: You claimed I was a DNC shill. It's up to you to prove your claim. Show me being a tireless DNC shill, I'm still waiting. You spoke of how my post history is open to everyone, so have at it.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
It's odd how you think it's backpedaling when I ask you to read for yourself.
Click to expand...

oh, you're not backpedaling?

cool. you have 0 citations/examples to support your claim. you have a mere 22+ left (depending on if you were including the actual 2 [my citations] or not). it should be easy since i posted half of the relevant table of contents for you...

lolz @ backpedaling all the way back to pretending that you have no burden of proof and i should read that which does not exist. while denying backpedaling.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
On the first sentence: Are you fucking stupid?

On you wanting me to provide 3 posts of me attacking the DNC: You claimed I was a DNC shill. It's up to you to prove your claim. Show me being a tireless DNC shill, I'm still waiting. You spoke of how my post history is open to everyone, so have at it.
Click to expand...

Wait. You want me to quote your entire posting history. Damn, how long we have.

If you are not a drone, why cant you find 3 instances of you disagreeing with the DNC? Or agreeing with Trump. I mean Prison reform was a good thing. So were some of the pardons. Attempted peace with NK was a pretty liberal stance.

How bout just 1 fucking instance. Just 1

Let's be serious. You do not think for yourself and your post history shows this. Everyone knows it.

No worries, a great many people are led by the DNC and corporate media.
 
SBJJ said:
But we'd just be using the same goalposts as u have with the Mueller investigation.
Click to expand...

Well no. That would mean dozen of criminal convictions for scores of people for the express reasons that the investigation was launched. I'm was letting you off with just one, but that wasn't good enough.

You sure do talk a small game.
 
rob mafia said:
holy. fucking. hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

It's not really my claim, but the documented instances in the report itself which are laid out in the table of contents, then in great detail within the report itself, which you have not read.
 
SBJJ said:
Wait. You want me to quote your entire posting history. Damn, how long we have.

If you are not a drone, why cant you find 3 instances of you disagreeing with the DNC? Or agreeing with Trump. I mean Prison reform was a good thing. So were some of the pardons. Attempted peace with NK was a pretty liberal stance.

How bout just 1 fucking instance. Just 1

Let's be serious. You do not think for yourself and your post history shows this. Everyone knows it.

No worries, a great many people are led by the DNC and corporate media.
Click to expand...

Again, I don't see how having not even voted for democrats in the only 3 presidential elections I have been old enough to vote in while not supporting any democratic candidate with funds or my time makes me a shill for the party.

Yet again, you made a claim, now you have to back it up. It's up to you and nobody else to do so.
 
Darkballs said:
Well no. That would mean dozen of criminal convictions for scores of people for the express reasons that the investigation was launched. I'm was letting you off with just one, but that wasn't good enough.

You sure do talk a small game.
Click to expand...

Not sure if being serious. There were 0 convictions in the Mueller investigation for collusion/conspiracy with Russia

Just stop already. You yelled there would be no convictions then when called out you curled up in a corner.
 
Last edited:
Darkballs said:
Well no. That would mean dozen of criminal convictions for scores of people for the express reasons that the investigation was launched. I'm was letting you off with just one, but that wasn't good enough.

You sure do talk a small game.
Click to expand...
I haven't followed this conversation very well, but your claims here seem odd. Scores of people? For the express reasons for which the investigation was launched? The Mueller investigation was started to examine the Russian government's attempts to interfere with the US election of 2016. Not only were no convictions made related to that express reason, but Mueller unequivocally claims that the evidence his investigation uncovered does not support the claim that any Americans coordinated with Russia in their attempts to interfere with the US election.

Am I missing sarcasm? That can happen in written conversations sometimes.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
It's not really my claim,
Click to expand...

dat backpedaling. (hint: this is a link proving that it is your claim. there are many other posts of yours making this claim, as well.)


hillelslovak87 said:
but the documented instances in the report itself which are laid out in the table of contents, then in great detail within the report itself, which you have not read.
Click to expand...

it's weird how i can't read things that don't exist, i guess.

weird how i posted the ToC, but there just wasn't anything there to support your claim. at all. let alone "dozens."

perhaps you should... you know, prove your claim and cite them? should be easy, no?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,021
Messages
57,962,857
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top