New scientific paper on Coronavirus origins: Well adapted to infect humans, rather than bats

MicroBrew

Plutonium Belt
@plutonium
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
52,978
Reaction score
25,404
New scientific paper uploaded to the pre-print server Biorxiv

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.01.073262v1

- Here's the main points:

Sars-Cov-2 (aka Wuhan coronavirus) samples resembles the LATE STAGE of Sars-cov-1 virus from 2002 , i.e. early Sars-cov-2 samples show it had already developed adaptation advantages for human transmission, whereas Sars-cov-1's innitial phase does not show such adaptations.

Sars-cov-2 is a sudden emergence of a highly infectious virus.

In a side-by-side comparison of evolutionary dynamics between the 2019/2020 SARS-CoV-2 and the 2003 SARS-CoV, we were surprised to find that SARS-CoV-2 resembles SARS-CoV in the late phase of the 2003 epidemic after SARS-CoV had developed several advantageous adaptations for human transmission.

--

Wuhan seafood market samples show they are similar to Sars-cov-2 isolates, so the virus entered the market in a human. If as popular opinion suggests the virus jumped from an animal - possibly a pangolin- to a human in the market the virus samples from the market would not be identical to Sars-cov-2 found in human isolates.

To look for clues regarding intermediate hosts, we analyze recent key findings relating to how SARS-CoV-2 could have evolved and adapted for human transmission, and examine the environmental samples from the Wuhan Huanan seafood market. Importantly, the market samples are genetically identical to human SARS-CoV-2 isolates and were therefore most likely from human sources.



----

The highly-infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus is most ideally adapted to infect human cells—rather than bat or pangolin cells, according to new computer modeling.


In a quest to find a vaccine or drug treatment for COVID-19, high-performance computer modeling has been used by Australian scientists to study the virus's ability to target a variety of 12 exotic and domestic animals in the hope of identifying the original source of the virus.

"The results clearly show that the COVID-19 virus is exquisitely adapted to infect humans," says Flinders University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, lead author of a new paper just published online in arXiv, a leading US preprint server for researchers.


The study, led by Flinders University scientists, compared the modeling to the virus's ability to bind to human cells and found the SARS-CoV-2 virus targets humans more potently than any of the tested animal species.

"The virus's ability to bind protein on human cells was far greater than its ability to bind the same protein in bats, which argues against bats being a direct source of the human virus."


The team's computer modeling shows the SARS-CoV-2 virus also bound strongly to cells of pangolins, an exotic ant-eater illegally imported into China.

"While it has been suggested by some Chinese scientists that the COVID-19 virus might have been transmitted to humans from pangolins, currently available data does not support this idea," Professor Petrovsky says


https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-05-covid-mystery.html


-------


The odds that this virus was an accidental release from a Chinese lab carrying out gain-of-function research on bat and pangolin coronaviruses just went up
 
Last edited:
One wonders why China is soo against allowing access to their labs in Wuhan.....
 
Too bad the Mongol invasions all those years ago never actually succeeded.
 
Fuck China
giphy.gif
 
One wonders why China is soo against allowing access to their labs in Wuhan.....


"Their" labs that we also funded by the USA. Didn't the US give them 200 million to help build that lab? And they shared Corona virus research with Fort Detrick.
 
At the end of the day, what does it matter? We have to open the shop.
 
Has anyone found out if Honey Badgers are vulnerable to Covid 19?
 
"Their" labs that we also funded by the USA. Didn't the US give them 200 million to help build that lab? And they shared Corona virus research with Fort Detrick.
No we didn't give them $200 millin. Trump admin claimed the Wuhan lab got a 5 year US grant to the tune of $7.5 million under the previous admin, but provided no evidence to back this up. Obama admin gave an American non-profit called Ecoalliance $3.7, who gave $600K to the Wuhan lab.
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/05/trump-spreads-distorted-claim-on-wuhan-lab-funding/

Fort Detrick has nothing to do with any of this. Chinese government propaghandists have been spreading the rumor that Fort Detrick created the virus and spread it in China.
https://www.fredericknewspost.com/n...cle_fdf4e5a6-82b8-5773-a8cd-a498e00fb5ef.html

The US funds research around the world, in a bid to find solutions to medical threats and issues facing humanity. US scientists worked with the director of the lab. Nothing nefarious about this.

China built the lab with French technical help, and modelled it on a Bio level 4 lab in France.
 
No we didn't give them $200 millin. Trump admin claimed the Wuhan lab got a 5 year US grant to the tune of $7.5 million under the previous admin, but provided no evidence to back this up. Obama admin gave an American non-profit called Ecoalliance $3.7, who gave $600K to the Wuhan lab.
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/05/trump-spreads-distorted-claim-on-wuhan-lab-funding/

Fort Detrick has nothing to do with any of this. Chinese government propaghandists have been spreading the rumor that Fort Detrick created the virus and spread it in China.
https://www.fredericknewspost.com/n...cle_fdf4e5a6-82b8-5773-a8cd-a498e00fb5ef.html

The US funds research around the world, in a bid to find solutions to medical threats and issues facing humanity. US scientists worked with the director of the lab. Nothing nefarious about this.

China built the lab with French technical help, and modelled it on a Bio level 4 lab in France.


Medical threats. Like China.
 
New scientific paper uploaded to the pre-print server Biorxiv

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.01.073262v1

- Here's the main points:

Sars-Cov-2 (aka Wuhan coronavirus) samples resembles the LATE STAGE of Sars-cov-1 virus from 2002 , i.e. early Sars-cov-2 samples show it had already developed adaptation advantages for human transmission, whereas Sars-cov-1's innitial phase does not show such adaptations.

Sars-cov-2 is a sudden emergence of a highly infectious virus.

In a side-by-side comparison of evolutionary dynamics between the 2019/2020 SARS-CoV-2 and the 2003 SARS-CoV, we were surprised to find that SARS-CoV-2 resembles SARS-CoV in the late phase of the 2003 epidemic after SARS-CoV had developed several advantageous adaptations for human transmission.

--

Wuhan seafood market samples show they are similar to Sars-cov-2 isolates, so the virus entered the market in a human. If as popular opinion suggests the virus jumped from an animal - possibly a pangolin- to a human in the market the virus samples from the market would not be identical to Sars-cov-2 found in human isolates.

To look for clues regarding intermediate hosts, we analyze recent key findings relating to how SARS-CoV-2 could have evolved and adapted for human transmission, and examine the environmental samples from the Wuhan Huanan seafood market. Importantly, the market samples are genetically identical to human SARS-CoV-2 isolates and were therefore most likely from human sources.



----

The highly-infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus is most ideally adapted to infect human cells—rather than bat or pangolin cells, according to new computer modeling.


In a quest to find a vaccine or drug treatment for COVID-19, high-performance computer modeling has been used by Australian scientists to study the virus's ability to target a variety of 12 exotic and domestic animals in the hope of identifying the original source of the virus.

"The results clearly show that the COVID-19 virus is exquisitely adapted to infect humans," says Flinders University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, lead author of a new paper just published online in arXiv, a leading US preprint server for researchers.


The study, led by Flinders University scientists, compared the modeling to the virus's ability to bind to human cells and found the SARS-CoV-2 virus targets humans more potently than any of the tested animal species.

"The virus's ability to bind protein on human cells was far greater than its ability to bind the same protein in bats, which argues against bats being a direct source of the human virus."


The team's computer modeling shows the SARS-CoV-2 virus also bound strongly to cells of pangolins, an exotic ant-eater illegally imported into China.

"While it has been suggested by some Chinese scientists that the COVID-19 virus might have been transmitted to humans from pangolins, currently available data does not support this idea," Professor Petrovsky says


https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-05-covid-mystery.html


-------


The odds that this virus was an accidental release from a Chinese lab carrying out gain-of-function research on bat and pangolin coronaviruses just went up
But in the first 30 minutes of this ordeal when all the scientific experts were wrong about everything a (likely political) group told us that it only could have come from a bat and that anything else was a "conspiracy theory," even though obviously it was just people looking at obvious factors and keeping an open mind. We have to pretend those knee-jerk initial findings are 100% accurate because leftists want China to be good guys now because they like union busting and the fall of the American worker. KEEP UP TO SPEED TS
 
New scientific paper uploaded to the pre-print server Biorxiv

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.01.073262v1

- Here's the main points:

Sars-Cov-2 (aka Wuhan coronavirus) samples resembles the LATE STAGE of Sars-cov-1 virus from 2002 , i.e. early Sars-cov-2 samples show it had already developed adaptation advantages for human transmission, whereas Sars-cov-1's innitial phase does not show such adaptations.

Sars-cov-2 is a sudden emergence of a highly infectious virus.

In a side-by-side comparison of evolutionary dynamics between the 2019/2020 SARS-CoV-2 and the 2003 SARS-CoV, we were surprised to find that SARS-CoV-2 resembles SARS-CoV in the late phase of the 2003 epidemic after SARS-CoV had developed several advantageous adaptations for human transmission.

--

Wuhan seafood market samples show they are similar to Sars-cov-2 isolates, so the virus entered the market in a human. If as popular opinion suggests the virus jumped from an animal - possibly a pangolin- to a human in the market the virus samples from the market would not be identical to Sars-cov-2 found in human isolates.

To look for clues regarding intermediate hosts, we analyze recent key findings relating to how SARS-CoV-2 could have evolved and adapted for human transmission, and examine the environmental samples from the Wuhan Huanan seafood market. Importantly, the market samples are genetically identical to human SARS-CoV-2 isolates and were therefore most likely from human sources.



----

The highly-infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus is most ideally adapted to infect human cells—rather than bat or pangolin cells, according to new computer modeling.


In a quest to find a vaccine or drug treatment for COVID-19, high-performance computer modeling has been used by Australian scientists to study the virus's ability to target a variety of 12 exotic and domestic animals in the hope of identifying the original source of the virus.

"The results clearly show that the COVID-19 virus is exquisitely adapted to infect humans," says Flinders University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, lead author of a new paper just published online in arXiv, a leading US preprint server for researchers.


The study, led by Flinders University scientists, compared the modeling to the virus's ability to bind to human cells and found the SARS-CoV-2 virus targets humans more potently than any of the tested animal species.

"The virus's ability to bind protein on human cells was far greater than its ability to bind the same protein in bats, which argues against bats being a direct source of the human virus."


The team's computer modeling shows the SARS-CoV-2 virus also bound strongly to cells of pangolins, an exotic ant-eater illegally imported into China.

"While it has been suggested by some Chinese scientists that the COVID-19 virus might have been transmitted to humans from pangolins, currently available data does not support this idea," Professor Petrovsky says


https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-05-covid-mystery.html


-------


The odds that this virus was an accidental release from a Chinese lab carrying out gain-of-function research on bat and pangolin coronaviruses just went up

<WellThere>

I would say it's almost certain at this point. What is unassailable is that the CCP tried to use this virus to their advantage. Even the most charitable interpretation still doesn't get them off the hook for suppressing information about the virus, pressuring other countries to keep international travel open, and attempting to corner the market on PPE. Whether it was just criminal negligence and incompetence with research and lab controls or an active attempt to create a bio weapon they are responsible for all the death, misery, and crashing of the global economy.
 
One wonders why China is soo against allowing access to their labs in Wuhan.....
Honestly, after it was said it wasn't made in a lab, I believed the scientific community. Now the Chinese have eroded that and made me only suspicious about this all
 
New scientific paper uploaded to the pre-print server Biorxiv

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.01.073262v1

- Here's the main points:

Sars-Cov-2 (aka Wuhan coronavirus) samples resembles the LATE STAGE of Sars-cov-1 virus from 2002 , i.e. early Sars-cov-2 samples show it had already developed adaptation advantages for human transmission, whereas Sars-cov-1's innitial phase does not show such adaptations.

Sars-cov-2 is a sudden emergence of a highly infectious virus.

In a side-by-side comparison of evolutionary dynamics between the 2019/2020 SARS-CoV-2 and the 2003 SARS-CoV, we were surprised to find that SARS-CoV-2 resembles SARS-CoV in the late phase of the 2003 epidemic after SARS-CoV had developed several advantageous adaptations for human transmission.

--

Wuhan seafood market samples show they are similar to Sars-cov-2 isolates, so the virus entered the market in a human. If as popular opinion suggests the virus jumped from an animal - possibly a pangolin- to a human in the market the virus samples from the market would not be identical to Sars-cov-2 found in human isolates.

To look for clues regarding intermediate hosts, we analyze recent key findings relating to how SARS-CoV-2 could have evolved and adapted for human transmission, and examine the environmental samples from the Wuhan Huanan seafood market. Importantly, the market samples are genetically identical to human SARS-CoV-2 isolates and were therefore most likely from human sources.



----

The highly-infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus is most ideally adapted to infect human cells—rather than bat or pangolin cells, according to new computer modeling.


In a quest to find a vaccine or drug treatment for COVID-19, high-performance computer modeling has been used by Australian scientists to study the virus's ability to target a variety of 12 exotic and domestic animals in the hope of identifying the original source of the virus.

"The results clearly show that the COVID-19 virus is exquisitely adapted to infect humans," says Flinders University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, lead author of a new paper just published online in arXiv, a leading US preprint server for researchers.


The study, led by Flinders University scientists, compared the modeling to the virus's ability to bind to human cells and found the SARS-CoV-2 virus targets humans more potently than any of the tested animal species.

"The virus's ability to bind protein on human cells was far greater than its ability to bind the same protein in bats, which argues against bats being a direct source of the human virus."


The team's computer modeling shows the SARS-CoV-2 virus also bound strongly to cells of pangolins, an exotic ant-eater illegally imported into China.

"While it has been suggested by some Chinese scientists that the COVID-19 virus might have been transmitted to humans from pangolins, currently available data does not support this idea," Professor Petrovsky says


https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-05-covid-mystery.html


-------


The odds that this virus was an accidental release from a Chinese lab carrying out gain-of-function research on bat and pangolin coronaviruses just went up

Good news for the Chinese as they can go back to eating bats and other exotic animals.
 
Back
Top